Topic: Requesting DT1 member to remove positive rep from abuser (Read 933 times)

Or he probably had nothing and they were just empty threats. A lot of scammers feeling indignant will resort to such childish methods, which never improve their situation. If they—for once—logically thought it through, they would realize that it was pointless to even send such a threat.
Especially one that would not affect the intended parties.

He probably remembered doing that would expose his entire alt ring and decided to just keep them to shitpost and scam

I wanna know where the 200 negatives are coming..

Donos is in trouble once again. Now why am I not surprised...?  

please remember who was the first one to discover and actually tag this lowlife scammer 

Yeah, I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that following him around the forum posting off topic replies isn't going to help you get your negative trust removed.

That so funny!

Dear actmyname! I need you help, and I want to talk with you!!!! On pm please!!!

Yeah, it would be a good idea to get a ciggie and burn your sperm up. We don't want to risk the chance of having more Danos's running around now, do we? There are enough inane 15 year-olds online already.

---

EDIT: two days later, still waiting for the bot to be activated.

To keep up with the spirit of this thread I will make a video of you begging for beer.

New negative trust feedback:

---

P.S., suchmoon, someday somehow if you meet me, you can buy me a beer.

I prefer to use your mother for my sperm needs fag
Don't forget this account, it will bring you a lot of hassle.
And don't forget the world is really small.
Someday somehow if you meet me, i promise to make video for the community how you begging

That would also imply that suchmoon is worried about getting negged or even kicked out of DT, which to the best of my knowledge is not the case. The OP is pissing into the wind regardless of the credibility of those threats.


I hope you haven't scammed anyone yet, not for the lack of trying though. Please use your Legendary account to tag me red or to call me an...

Ok


That's not how being sick of something works


hmm


hmmmmmmmmmmm

---

tl;dr contradictory statements, followed by more contradictory statements mixed with a heavy dose of irony and hypocrisy.

Dude why you think i have scammed pennies ? Why the fuck you even think i scammed anyone ?
Im just sick of this cancer community. I will just go ahead and use my Legendary account once again because catching scammers from this one was hard job.
People love scammers, and i will support them from now on.
P.S: My offer still stands to see this kid with red trust.

You claim to have over 100 bitcoins.

We know you had at least 20 bitcoins you stole.

You beg for tips in your signature.   

I can see why you get the bitches so wet buddy! I so want to buy you a pint!

---

Actually I feel like I should have clarified, I meant he would required negatives from DTs which is substantially more difficult than regular negatives and from what little I have seen there's very obvious "factions" (without delving too deep into that since I guess it's pretty who's usually supporting who) and any DT negatively rating another generally causes a crap ton of unnecessary drama and hence it's pretty unlikely any DT would act to support some inconsequential nobody.


Or you're Danos' alt 


I'm currently yet to edit my trust list since I'm still figuring out who's reliable and worthy of being trusted. I particularly don't bother reading the numbers at times and feel the actual details are more relevant. Quite a few times the unstrusted feedback can prove to be useful (there's quite a few "trusted" but not DT members who leave ratings) and reading the references attached which usually gives you a clearer picture than arbitrary ratings which may or may not be accurate. Obviously I ignore all the retaliatory and downright idiotic feedback like the ones left on everyone's profile "Wants Gay child porn".

Side Note: You're trying too hard to be a troll and failing OP 


I've skimmed it a couple of times but I kinda slackened and get lazy reading long articles 


I have kinda dug up some of the dirt that was being flung and read up a bit. I have a rough idea of what the general accusations every one is usually associated with (QS and Self Escrows/Alting, OG and his business, a bunch of people and some extortion, TF's inputs.io etc) but not the exact details so I haven't made any specific comments.

You can say that again.


And that.


Actually, no.  (This is the point of my hereby post.)

It would require negative ratings from trusted people to affect suchmoon in any way whatsoever.  Check my trust page.  With a relatively new account and moderate anti-abuse activity, I already have 5 negatives—all retaliatory red from morons.  Do I like like I’m in the negative to you?  Now, look at suchmoon’s trust page.  I count about seven dozen red marks.  Like mine, they show under “Untrusted feedback” unless you’re stupid enough to add people like Danos to your trust list.

Or if you really want an eye-popping sight, look at Lauda’s trust page.  There, in addition to about a zillion untrusted red marks from whining spammers and scammers, you may see a few allegedly “trusted” negatives from OgNasty and shorena.  It is for this reason that I recommend setting exclusions, such as ~OgNasty.  Or better still, dump DefaultTrust and set up your own trust list from scratch.  I currently have the following at my Depth 0, and the world of the Bitcoin Forum looks quite different to me than it will to you:


That is my “trust list quick fix”.  Lauda has more detailed recommendations; but I want to develop my trust list independently, and the foregoing suffices for me for now.

There is much more to learn about the trust system.  I suggest you start with theymos’ announcement thereof, although n.b. that some things have changed in the five years since his OP in that thread.  Also, it’s ironic that the first reply was from TradeFortress, who subsequently pulled one of the worst long-con scams in Bitcoin Forum history.  By the way (I know you replied there; though that thread may be difficult for you to understand if you don’t dig around and figure out the history of the characters involved).

Well he doesn't seem to be very smart either  But for real though what's even the point of this thread, the "threats" clearly aren't working. The rating has now been seen by quite a few people and any countering of trust ratings would be pretty useless (AFAIK it would require like 3-4 negative ratings to bring suchmoon to Negative and I doubt that would happen as then given the "hype" that would create that would start petty rating wars)


From what I've read in his accusation threads he pretty much sets off on a high horse and attacks anyone criticizing him non stop till people stop. He's pretty much gaslighting people IMO

That doesn't really make very much sense considering the amount of attention he has now brought upon himself.

I'm also not quite sure why he would be going around scamming for pennies when he claims to have <$1 million in bitcoin. He is honestly probably just a troll.

I never spoke against emotion.  Rather, against empathy.  The discussion started after a DT (whom I otherwise respect) said he felt sad over the plea of an allegedly impoverished spammer who allegedly really, really needed to spam.  Even if the sob story be true, I have no empathy, compassion, or pity whatsoever for such a cretin.

(N.b. that if poverty were adequate cause for criminal behaviour, then I myself would have become a criminal at certain points in my life.  I did not; and I have nothing but cold contempt for those who do.)


I just set my profile birthday to my account’s creation date.  Since my account is now only 11 months old, my profile now shows my age as 0.  Beat that.