Pages:
Author

Topic: Resolved: Account Closure and ~8.38 ETH Confiscated (Read 461 times)

sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
This is the first time I am seen Scam Accusation CG. And this is one thing that I don't like KYC. Look at the things they are asking from him to have access back to the account. Those documents are 100% private and if they are given to someone they can use it to do something against you. But that your funds is a big amount of money and I don't think taking them to legal action can solve the problem and if does the law will also ask those documents for identification though they reduced the KYC. But if you know that they will pay the cash then you can provide the details for them to activate your account back to you. CG is reputable company and they will not leak your information to anyone.


The issue with sharing my personal and private information is not with whether or not CG is a reputable company or not.

Reputable companies get hacked all the time and leak user's information even "reputable" security companies:

https://blog.lastpass.com/2023/03/security-incident-update-recommended-actions/

The information that i'm asked to provide to CG has the potential to be leaked.

Once leaked it can potentially destroy not only my personal life and my personal financials but also potentially affect any of the business we own and operate, as well as our current relationship with our clients and business partners. (eg. If scammer uses our info to phish or clients)

I am not going to allow that to happen.

I don't understand why majority of people don't care about their privacy!

Since you're so concerned about your privacy, you're a fool to use websites that even mention KYC - mandatory on not mandatory, you would get fu***d sooner or later. I stopped using most of the websites when they came up with KYC crap.
hero member
Activity: 2954
Merit: 796
Is not the first time I have seen a casino confiscate the user money with the KYC argument,  casinos are in their right to do it, but on the users' side doesn't feel fair at all.

Agree on this. I still feel sometimes requiring KYC just to withdraw my balance is unfair even though I already verify my account on different casino. This is why user should understand the danger of Casino with license if they don't want to undergo KYC because ignorance on the ToS will result to terrible loss.

What I don't understand on the KYC part is why the casino still needs to KYC user account if they are just refunding the customer deposit amount and confiscate the profit. This case might be off-topic to the OP but it's good discussion for KYC issues.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 507

I firmly believe that providing such personal and private information goes against my rights and violates my privacy.Therefore, I have no intentions of giving in to these demands. Unfortunately, CG has made it clear that failure to provide the requested documents will result in the closure of my account and the confiscation of my funds (Current Balance: ~8.38 ETH).


It does violate your right to reveal your identity or unveil your privacy but playing or registering in CEX you should have known it may be required.  In a case where you didn't go through such KYC in the beginning, you should expect that if your account is flagged for any activity, for you to regain access, you may be required to go through KYC. Well I hope you get through to this. It is a minor issue that you could resolve if you follow the KYC rule.
The basic thing to note while playing in centralized casino is that, your identity must at some point ve reviewed, this could come at any time, While some players are requested to do the verification at the point of account creation, others may come later on along the line so the is what every player must know and have to settle with before their decide to create account on any casino.


The issue of KYC is now becoming a prevailing issue in the gambling industry lately and with the involvement of regulators in the industry a lot of things and regulations are coming up, and the gambler must have to keep up with those demands and avoid those you can avoid.
hero member
Activity: 3178
Merit: 977
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
In fact, that's a huge amount—8 more than Ethereum. What's not good about what they did is that they took the information they needed from you, and then nothing will benefit from what you want to happen. It's even better that from the beginning they rejected your account without asking for any important documents that you have, just like what happened before, your data privacy was stolen via your personal IDs, for what they did is very unfair. I hope they won't use it for bad purposes.
What the heck are you going on about here? Op hasn't even submitted his KYC and it looks like has no plans to do so at any point in the future which is why whatever you are saying doesn't make much sense.

He wouldn't need to open this thread and go through this ordeal if he would have just submitted his KYC in the first place.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 3125
But I understand now that we have common opinion about the case of OP that he can’t claim his fund without undergoing KYC.

Each casino has its own rules and we must read them before playing in the casino and follow the rules because from the moment we make a deposit the money is now casino money and they can find a way to lock it if they want.

Is not the first time I have seen a casino confiscate the user money with the KYC argument,  casinos are in their right to do it, but on the users' side doesn't feel fair at all.
legendary
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1341
This is the first time I am seen Scam Accusation CG. And this is one thing that I don't like KYC. Look at the things they are asking from him to have access back to the account. Those documents are 100% private and if they are given to someone they can use it to do something against you. But that your funds is a big amount of money and I don't think taking them to legal action can solve the problem and if does the law will also ask those documents for identification though they reduced the KYC. But if you know that they will pay the cash then you can provide the details for them to activate your account back to you. CG is reputable company and they will not leak your information to anyone.
copper member
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1179
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Sorry for my directness, but after your words you can forget about your ETH. Even if you haven’t broken any rules, an unscrupulous gambling site can simply take them away from you, despite risking its reputation.

When it comes to amounts like 8.38 ETH, almost any gambling platform can go to great lengths to prevent you from withdrawing them from there. And even if you are a long-time user for them with a large number of attracted friends. This does not matter for the gambling platform. In any case, by creating such topics, you show that gambling sites cannot be trusted, especially when you have such a large amount. It is better to scatter (diversify) across other gambling platforms so that they are smaller and the site is not tempted to not return them to you under various pretexts (be it KYC or something else).

This is not true. Reputable casino can payout instantly more than that amount as long as you can provide necessary documents for KYC which ToS stated. They are not using the ToS just to hold the withdrawal but rather it’s requirements by their license since it’s already huge amount that coincides the AML rules. Crypto.games  is one of long time running casino here in the forum and he has a choice to claim the balance.

For me, if he has nothing to hide then he should just do KYC to claim his funds or forget about his funds if he is not willing to comply. This user is using the forum to get sympathy about his case while the answer to his problem is already given on his narration.
I mean that the OP said that he won't go through the KYC and won't provide his data under any circumstances, then he won't be given an ETH. Of course, with such a quantity of ETH, the OP falls under AML. After all, if it didn’t exist, money would be laundered through Crypto.games. They don't want this, so everything is logical. Therefore, I think that it is 99% that the funds will not be returned to him, I have nothing more to add, but the principles for the OP are worth more than that.

Your whole statement claim that any casino will hold that kind amount and use KYC as delaying tactics to avoid paying out user while ToS is already given before user create an account or in OP case, He doesn’t check the casino ToS for a long time and only rely to the old rules when he started to use crypto.games.

I will not react in your statement if you will contruct it the way you constructed now because it’s interpreted by that since you suggest to diversify assets which is useless since casino can ask KYC anytime no matter what is the amount involved if you can read the ToS under AML policy. Guy like OP should stay away completely on centralized casino that has a tendency to apply KYC to all its customer.

But I understand now that we have common opinion about the case of OP that he can’t claim his fund without undergoing KYC.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1104
Quote
I firmly believe that providing such personal and private information goes against my rights and violates my privacy.Therefore, I have no intentions of giving in to these demands. Unfortunately, CG has made it clear that failure to provide the requested documents will result in the closure of my account and the confiscation of my funds (Current Balance: ~8.38 ETH).

     -   I'm sad that I read this for you, mate. I'm not sure if I understood correctly what you mean, despite the fact that you gave them so many documents with your billing statement. In the end, it's also disappointing whether they closed your account on their platform with your remaining account balances there.

In fact, that's a huge amount—8 more than Ethereum. What's not good about what they did is that they took the information they needed from you, and then nothing will benefit from what you want to happen. It's even better that from the beginning they rejected your account without asking for any important documents that you have, just like what happened before, your data privacy was stolen via your personal IDs, for what they did is very unfair. I hope they won't use it for bad purposes.
Read it again, especially the part that is highlighted. the OP completely did the opposite of what you are saying. he hasn't given and has refused to give any documents to crypto.games and has no plan of doing so. sadly it looks like this will be a dead end, OP has no plans of doing the KYC and crypto.games has no plan of releasing the fund without the OP doing the KYC.
sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 303
Quote
I firmly believe that providing such personal and private information goes against my rights and violates my privacy.Therefore, I have no intentions of giving in to these demands. Unfortunately, CG has made it clear that failure to provide the requested documents will result in the closure of my account and the confiscation of my funds (Current Balance: ~8.38 ETH).

     -   I'm sad that I read this for you, mate. I'm not sure if I understood correctly what you mean, despite the fact that you gave them so many documents with your billing statement. In the end, it's also disappointing whether they closed your account on their platform with your remaining account balances there.

In fact, that's a huge amount—8 more than Ethereum. What's not good about what they did is that they took the information they needed from you, and then nothing will benefit from what you want to happen. It's even better that from the beginning they rejected your account without asking for any important documents that you have, just like what happened before, your data privacy was stolen via your personal IDs, for what they did is very unfair. I hope they won't use it for bad purposes.
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1312
The only solution in this case is that OP should follow what is asked by crypto.games if he want his money. Otherwise, I doubt there will be another win-win solution for this case. Lesson learned which is actually started since few years ago is that KYC will be something normal in crypto industry although privacy was one of the main advantage in this crypto industry. But it has changed, most crypto industry started to be regulated and licensed for several years already and customers should be ready for it. Unwilling to follow the terms means the customer will not be able to access the funds.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1183
Sorry for my directness, but after your words you can forget about your ETH. Even if you haven’t broken any rules, an unscrupulous gambling site can simply take them away from you, despite risking its reputation.

When it comes to amounts like 8.38 ETH, almost any gambling platform can go to great lengths to prevent you from withdrawing them from there. And even if you are a long-time user for them with a large number of attracted friends. This does not matter for the gambling platform. In any case, by creating such topics, you show that gambling sites cannot be trusted, especially when you have such a large amount. It is better to scatter (diversify) across other gambling platforms so that they are smaller and the site is not tempted to not return them to you under various pretexts (be it KYC or something else).

This is not true. Reputable casino can payout instantly more than that amount as long as you can provide necessary documents for KYC which ToS stated. They are not using the ToS just to hold the withdrawal but rather it’s requirements by their license since it’s already huge amount that coincides the AML rules. Crypto.games  is one of long time running casino here in the forum and he has a choice to claim the balance.

For me, if he has nothing to hide then he should just do KYC to claim his funds or forget about his funds if he is not willing to comply. This user is using the forum to get sympathy about his case while the answer to his problem is already given on his narration.
I mean that the OP said that he won't go through the KYC and won't provide his data under any circumstances, then he won't be given an ETH. Of course, with such a quantity of ETH, the OP falls under AML. After all, if it didn’t exist, money would be laundered through Crypto.games. They don't want this, so everything is logical. Therefore, I think that it is 99% that the funds will not be returned to him, I have nothing more to add, but the principles for the OP are worth more than that.
copper member
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1179
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Sorry for my directness, but after your words you can forget about your ETH. Even if you haven’t broken any rules, an unscrupulous gambling site can simply take them away from you, despite risking its reputation.

When it comes to amounts like 8.38 ETH, almost any gambling platform can go to great lengths to prevent you from withdrawing them from there. And even if you are a long-time user for them with a large number of attracted friends. This does not matter for the gambling platform. In any case, by creating such topics, you show that gambling sites cannot be trusted, especially when you have such a large amount. It is better to scatter (diversify) across other gambling platforms so that they are smaller and the site is not tempted to not return them to you under various pretexts (be it KYC or something else).

This is not true. Reputable casino can payout instantly more than that amount as long as you can provide necessary documents for KYC which ToS stated. They are not using the ToS just to hold the withdrawal but rather it’s requirements by their license since it’s already huge amount that coincides the AML rules. Crypto.games  is one of long time running casino here in the forum and he has a choice to claim the balance.

For me, if he has nothing to hide then he should just do KYC to claim his funds or forget about his funds if he is not willing to comply. This user is using the forum to get sympathy about his case while the answer to his problem is already given on his narration.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1183
I included screenshots of my conversations with CG as evidence for my decision. This was necessary because I have developers and business partners to answer to, and I cannot and will not compromise my principles and privacy for any price.

One of the main reasons I have remained with CG for so long is because my privacy was respected.
It is disheartening to now see CG blatantly trading my ~8.38 ETH Balance in exchange for my personal and private information.
I firmly believe that privacy is a fundamental right that should be respected, and no amount of money or potential gains should compromise that.

Sorry for my directness, but after your words you can forget about your ETH. Even if you haven’t broken any rules, an unscrupulous gambling site can simply take them away from you, despite risking its reputation.

When it comes to amounts like 8.38 ETH, almost any gambling platform can go to great lengths to prevent you from withdrawing them from there. And even if you are a long-time user for them with a large number of attracted friends. This does not matter for the gambling platform. In any case, by creating such topics, you show that gambling sites cannot be trusted, especially when you have such a large amount. It is better to scatter (diversify) across other gambling platforms so that they are smaller and the site is not tempted to not return them to you under various pretexts (be it KYC or something else).
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 421
I will advise you do the KYC and take your assets and forget about to he casino. Do no it trust any third party to keep your assets with them. Remember that " Not your keys not your coin" is still very much important. I believe you have learnt your lessons from this experience now.

And what we learned from this situation? We can all find ourselves in a situation where the casino tells us that we have to go through the KYC procedure if we want to continue playing and depositing/withdrawing money. It's a "new normal", and we have to be ready for something like that, especially if some bigger money is at stake.

Well, I would probably take your advice... At least for this amount I would finish KYC and move the big part of that balance to my wallet, but I am not sure I would just forget about the casino. If it's going good maybe I would continue playing, and I would feel pretty safe about my future deposits & withdrawals.

Absolutely, one must do his or her check and balance to know  what they stand to benefit most against all odds. If OP feels after finishing his or her KYC and the casino is still okay, up and doing then so be it if otherwise OP should do the needful and  go on with his or her life.
Come to talk of it, the value of the asset is not worth losing. If it is in my country here, it is a huge amount of money for that matter. Although the amount is still very big in dollars and is not worth leaving there but one thing OP should know is that laws are not static as well. They can change policies at any time and one would have no option than to play along for their own interest. OP should know this and do the needful.
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1179
I will advise you do the KYC and take your assets and forget about to he casino. Do no it trust any third party to keep your assets with them. Remember that " Not your keys not your coin" is still very much important. I believe you have learnt your lessons from this experience now.

And what we learned from this situation? We can all find ourselves in a situation where the casino tells us that we have to go through the KYC procedure if we want to continue playing and depositing/withdrawing money. It's a "new normal", and we have to be ready for something like that, especially if some bigger money is at stake.

Well, I would probably take your advice... At least for this amount I would finish KYC and move the big part of that balance to my wallet, but I am not sure I would just forget about the casino. If it's going good maybe I would continue playing, and I would feel pretty safe about my future deposits & withdrawals.
legendary
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1261
-snip-
Based on my experience, and some statements like ToS.

They have the right to ask you (KYC) sometimes without needing to explain the reason or detail, why? it's gambling even you should prepared to provide this data in case you are being asked. IMO, there always have some NDA things example like cheating in Sportbook (If player getting caught) most of the time they will get asked for KYC & block their account & tell them will break some of their term & conditions.

Player will ask, how they are checking the activity ? and somethings like that. Most of the time casino will be refused to answer these question, because potential for NDA things stuff (they don't want the method being leaked) and the player will find a new loophole.

I believe CG are the site who required you to register using a simple register like (Email & Password), we all know these typical site is centralized-site while in the future some change might be happend and you required to follow these.

Unless, you are betting with decentralzied-platform everything is using a chain.
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 421

When it comes to fund and assets, It is well known that one needs to protect it with utmost care and caution. I believe you have heard this word here and it is very popular for members conversant with the crypto community and it says "not your keys, not your coin".This words speaks of volume because they say exactly what really happens in the crypto world when it comes to third party holding custody of your assets. Third party holding your assets does not guarantee you the ownership because they are not decentralized so therefore what ever they ask you to do, you must obey otherwise your assets are gone. This is the situation in which you are now OP.

When it comes to business, you should know that every organisation looks for a way to maximize profit which casinos are not left out and I believe this is the situation in which you are facing now as the amount of asset discussed here is not a small amount if we are to look into it. You should have withdrawn your assets long enough  to protect and save yourself this stress. It is better for you to do the kyc and get your funds as they will tell you they are acting in accordance with government policies to safeguard themselves even though there is nothing for them to hold unto. This should be a lesson to you so in the future you do not entrust your funds to any third party what so ever the situation is.



I refuse to compromise my principles and privacy by complying with these demands. I am being coerced into providing my personal and private information in exchange for a refund. How can this be considered an acceptable business practice?

Until I receive the full balance i'm owed, I plan to keep this post visible indefinitely and dedicate time on weekends to leave comprehensive reviews on multiple casino review sites in order to increase awareness about this situation.

This behavior is completely unacceptable!

I have reached my limit and will no longer allow myself to be taken advantage of! 6 YEARS!!



In as much as you said you would not compromise your principles and privacy that's great but you should know that third parties are mostly centralised now and most of them are acting based on the laws governing their jurisdiction where they find themselves. If in the past they had no KYC policy  that was then and not the present. As a result of government actions and sanctions,they decided to implement the KYC policies which everyone member would  have to undergo before they make any withdrawal.  So you would not blame them for the sudden change of policy as they too are protecting their name and image from being booted. You should know that things changes as time passes by.  For instance, I believe there are some things you do then and as you grow old you changed and you stopped because you feel you bigger than those things. So it is with the casino and to cut it short the government policy warrants that they conduct KYC on their clients so they are doing and do not forget that they are centralised.

I will advise you do the KYC and take your assets and forget about to the casino. Do not trust any third party to keep your assets with them. Remember that " Not your keys not your coin" is still very much important. I believe you have learnt your lessons from this experience now.
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1083
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
This is very disheartening and disappointing, and I perfectly understand your frustrations, 8.38 eth is over $13,000 today and could even worth way more than this in the near future when the much anticipated bull run comes on ...

I will advice you to think carefully about your decision to abadon this money with the casino on the ground of being asked to submit your personal documents for account verification, you are the one losing a very big amount of money here and not the casino, the casino is only following rules laid out for them by their license issuer and regulatory laws, they probably don't have anything to do with your documents, requesting for them from you is them fulfilling all righteousness and obey laws which helps them stay in business to even serve you better ..

If you are going to be on the internet and carry out activities that will require you transacting in money, then be ready to compromise what ever believe you had about privacy, else , just stay away and only focus on social media platforms like facebook and X(formerly Twitter).

Any online platform that are into money services will one day request for your identity verification no matter how long it takes , so rethink your decision my friend, you are the one losing here and not the casino, the casino will be very happy to take your 8.38 eth and keep it until each one of those is worth $7000 each , do the calculation.. again , I say rethink your decision .

Think of this, if you own an account in the bank which I am sure you do, then be sure you have compromise your privacy which you think you are fighting to protect, what difference does it make with the casino now ?.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1039
Bitcoin Trader
I completely understand your frustrations op since I detest KYC myself and only provide it when absolutely necessary, but it has become mandatory for most crypto gambling sites these days regardless of whether they stated the same or not.

You need to submit your KYC if you wish to access your funds. If you don't, you won't be able to claim your funds. Very, very few sites don't request any form of KYC at any point and those are usually relatively new or unpopular.

Think carefully!
Yes it is an easy thing to end this problem, rules are still rules respect casino rules if we want to be truly respected, I think that is a fair way to solve problems that might take a long time if it continues, if the OP really wants the money do what the casino asks but if the OP doesn't want the money and doesn't want to comply with the casino's requirements then just leave and close this thread.

I don't think everyone can help in this case unless the OP really wants the problem to be resolved in a good way, namely by complying with the rules and requirements that are part of crypto.games, I'm sure there is no one on this forum who intends to defend anyone from the problem to let alone find the right one, but I think the problem seems to be solved in a good way either by complying with the crypto.games casino.
hero member
Activity: 3178
Merit: 977
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
I completely understand your frustrations op since I detest KYC myself and only provide it when absolutely necessary, but it has become mandatory for most crypto gambling sites these days regardless of whether they stated the same or not.

You need to submit your KYC if you wish to access your funds. If you don't, you won't be able to claim your funds. Very, very few sites don't request any form of KYC at any point and those are usually relatively new or unpopular.

Think carefully!
Pages:
Jump to: