This is much needed:
I will avoid replying to JollyGood, airfinex, Poker Player, decodx and GazetaBitcoin . Let's work on solving the problems Icopress have against me.
So instead of the other thread (where this post will be off topic), I have this topic to answer you.
I'll leave this here as a reminder for myself.
Three of my clients (I have not yet received a response from the rest) informed me that they received a letter from Royce in which he intrusively offers his services under the pretext of banning mixers on Bitcointak. Making it sound like I'm nothing, Lol.. maybe he thinks I can't take care of marketing to my clients outside of the forum.
What’s especially funny is that not long ago I was chatting about sponsorship deals with MegaPari, but when it came to launching a campaign, I refused and wrote to Royce to contact these guys.
For me this is extremely unethical behavior.
Edited: Four of my clients.
Come down man, it sounds like only your clients received those offers. I was sending the same PMs to some projects (active and none active both, so which ones were managed by which manager or even if any of them already had a marketing on the forum, was not in the mind). If you have doubt then ask julerz12, one of his client also received the same message and we both had a chat earlier about some other topic.
Don't consider yourself the center of the business. You and
GazetaBitcoin really needs a break. Don't force me to go bad and expose what you two do behind the scene (the template, scripts - guess what I mean). Have in mind that I am also a campaign manager and I have connections with a lot of projects which I managed and not managed (I also have very very close connections with many forum members too). Time to time they tell me things too which I never thought to post like you did in public because it will not look good on you two.
A bold statement is when someone brags about how much they earn and how much clients' money they keep.
A bold claim is when someone pays several participants a very high rate, and claims that it is the “highest paying campaign.”
This was your last message and it clearly means you have problems with me. If you indeed have problems then let's talk and solve it here or let's stay away from each others. Don't write something that could trigger me to response you. I never did any so far unless other day I saw the following conversation between you and another user.
[banned mixer] raised their payrate to 10 USD until end of campaign. Finally beating the payrate of CM.
Any news from MixTum? Asking for a friend.
Did you mean Tumbler?
This is just a trick...
and it is unlikely that they could compete with MixTum if there had not been a ban since January 1 (in every sense of the word).
As for the campaign... the campaign is still ongoing, as I have not yet received a response from MixTum.
This week I even took on two new members to the campaign.
Isn't it a very bold statement to tell something like this for one over another one?
I was asked to make the pay rate $14 per post which I could do very easily since the money is not going out of my pocket but imagine would that benefit the project? No.
As a campaign manager I think our job is to balance the marketing budget and the ROI. Sinbad was a prime example of a successful brand until ...