Pages:
Author

Topic: *Restarted* Post history review offer - page 5. (Read 3659 times)

legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
January 19, 2023, 02:21:07 PM
#72
Btw when this thread was unlocked I thought it was closed few weeks back?
Yeah, I opened it back up to make that big bold and red announcement and figured I might as well keep it open so it'd stay visible (which helps me out).  So far the shitposts haven't been too bad, though it does seem like people either aren't reading things fully, at all, don't understand what they're reading, or don't give a shit about words in general.

You know, business as usual on bitcointalk.

I can lock it up if you or anyone else thinks it's becoming a spectacle, but I have a feeling that if and when I do that I'll just have to bump it again with another message that....fucking mongoloids....are just going to ignore.  But you know, I just keep rollin' that ball up the hill over and over.
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 2124
January 19, 2023, 11:30:07 AM
#71
It's just a nickname, doesn't mean it only applies to post creators right? Grin
In the forum context the term @OP is used for the original poster not nicknames so that's why he was saying that.As you can see the OP patch was also added recently by @theymos to recognise the @OP which means who has started the topic with his each post in that thread.


Btw when this thread was unlocked I thought it was closed few weeks back?
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 560
January 19, 2023, 10:14:55 AM
#70
Snipped

This thing you're doing is nothing but more invocation of provocation, this thread was already created to clear the air that he has ended the post review, yet you're asking him to do so, dont you think you're already on his ignored list if am not mistaken, i will employ that you stop sending unsolicited pm in other nit to get yourself reported to the moderators and possibly got a temporary ban, it's not a force you must received Merits from a user, if you're truly a quality poster you shouldn't have challenges with receiving Merits from other members.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 547
January 19, 2023, 07:41:11 AM
#69
Eh, I've visited the thread (usually when I'm reviewing posts) but it just seems like a lot of masturbation, and there's a unique community there that's seemingly apart from the rest of the forum and I never felt like making myself a part of it. 

Well, there are a lot of other users as well who do not feel interested in some specific part of the forum. Yeah, some users always post on WO just to catch some merits. That's why sometimes the WO thread seems like you described.

Also, I saw a lot of WO guys do not post in other sections except WO. What about legendary don't hunters who have made thousands of posts in bounty and never feel like they should explore the forum? They are still on newbie rank.

Quote
Grrrr.  I never heard words like that until after my name change got approved, and I had no idea anyone even gave a millisecond of brain space to my username before.  I'm happy, but I can see it from your perspective as well.  I don't know about having a famous name, but given how many posts I've made and how long I've been active I don't doubt the ol' moniker was recognizable at least.

Thanks for the nice words.

Of course, your satisfaction and your happiness should be your main priority. Yeah, Your old name was famous enough. If someone does not notice that you changed your name, they may think "Where was this guy?" Newbie Legendary? 😂
Just kidding.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
January 19, 2023, 07:20:58 AM
#68

I used to be active on the WO thread, and I don't see you there. Maybe you don't like WO?
Eh, I've visited the thread (usually when I'm reviewing posts) but it just seems like a lot of masturbation, and there's definitely a unique community there that's seemingly apart from the rest of the forum and I never felt like making myself a part of it.  But hey, if you like it more power to you.  If we were all the same, the world would be fucked in every hole and stale as dollar store bagel.


I remember I saw your name change request thread and trying to get the attention of theymos. Congratulations on your name change. I am sorry, but your old name was also famous and cool. BTW, Sorry for the off-topic.
Grrrr.  I never heard words like that until after my name change got approved, and I'd no idea anyone even gave a millisecond of brainspace to my username before.  I'm definitely happy, but I can see it from your perspective as well.  I don't know about having a famous name, but given how many posts I've made and how long I've been active I don't doubt the ol' moniker was recognizable at least.

Thanks for the nice wordz.
hero member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 802
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
January 19, 2023, 07:12:56 AM
#67
I don't think he is OP  Roll Eyes
It's just a nickname, doesn't mean it only applies to post creators right? Grin

~Snip~ I haven't been getting many PMs from members who meet my criteria, so I'm going to ask that if I've done a review for you for at least two months (doesn't matter which months), send me a PM and I'll see what I can do. ~Snip~
Does this apply to people who don't meet your review criteria, I'm starting to err on the side of asking for a second review and not reading the rules you set. I'm wondering if there's any chance you'd review people who have had reviews before, even if they only got one review in November for example.

This is important for me to ask, so that in the future we don't make a second mistake, both for me personally and for other people. Because to be honest, we still really need you in the process of increasing the next account ranking.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 547
January 19, 2023, 05:00:27 AM
#66
Yep!

I am not active all over the forum. But I have to now because of my signature campaign (LOL).
I used to be active on the WO thread, and I don't see you there. Maybe you don't like WO? I remember I saw your name change request thread and trying to get the attention of theymos. Congratulations on your name change. I am sorry, but your old name was also famous and cool. BTW, Sorry for the off-topic.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
January 19, 2023, 04:17:58 AM
#65
Good day sir,I wrote to you on the month of September for a review of my posts,which you did and merited them,the next day,you wrote to me that my post are not quality enough for your merits,I have posted some quality post which I wanted to PM you and it writes that you have blocked me from sending message to you.
I probably was trying to be extremely generous when I gave you those merits, but the fact is that your posts are extremely generic and their quality is such that if I just came across them in a thread I was reading I would skip right over them.  And if I'm being really honest, you're not the kind of member I want to help rank up, because I know damn well why you're a member of the forum.

And you obviously don't read anything, else you would have seen what I wrote in big bold red letters, which MarjorieZimmermanGinger was kind enough to quote.  I mean, c'mon man.

I keep getting PMs like this from members who obviously heard about my offer but mysteriously haven't come across this thread.  Blows my mind.  

BTW, Is it The Pharmacist who has tried to change his username for a long time?
Yep!
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 547
January 09, 2023, 02:30:03 PM
#64
OP...!!!

I don't think he is OP  Roll Eyes
BTW, Is it The Pharmacist who has tried to change his username for a long time?
hero member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 802
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
January 09, 2023, 01:55:28 PM
#63
>Snip
OP...!!!
It doesn't look like this will help those of you and I who have been blocked by The Skeptical Chymist, despite requesting a review in this thread, as he has already explained the criteria for people falling into that category who have a chance for review.

That's not how I'm saying this works.  If a member has requested reviews from me in September, October, and November then I will continue to accept reminders on a monthly basis.  

Meaning if we send messages sequentially in September, October and November then we fall into that category, but in December he no longer receives messages for review history and in this post he has explained. At this time we have to get used to earning Merit independently, by increasing the quality of posts, because I'm sure there will be others who are also willing to help.

As long as the red text below has not been edited and there have been no new notifications, the possibility for review is very small.

I am not taking any new requests for post history reviews and until further notice I'm only doing reviews for members who've been consistently PMing me--specifically for the last 3 months (since September).  Any member who doesn't fit into that category and sends me a PM is just going to have it deleted without reply.

From now on we must also get used to respecting his privacy.
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 586
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
January 08, 2023, 08:53:06 AM
#62
Good day sir,I wrote to you on the month of September for a review of my posts,which you did and merited them,the next day,you wrote to me that my post are not quality enough for your merits,I have posted some quality post which I wanted to PM you and it writes that you have blocked me from sending message to you. That's is why am posting here to let you know if you can review my new posts or grant access for application,since my first review was on September.

Thank you Sir
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
January 03, 2023, 10:17:01 AM
#61
Is there a chance for members that PMed in the month of November to get a post reviewed after been skipped or does that simply tells the member he didn’t meets the new requirements for review.
I don't know if there's a language barrier issue going on with this or what, but I thought I made it crystal clear what my plans are.

As to your question, if you've only started PMing me in November, then you are not eligible for a review until further notice.  You have to have been requesting reviews every month since September.  In case you missed it, I said it the last time here:

That's not how I'm saying this works.  If a member has requested reviews from me in September, October, and November then I will continue to accept reminders on a monthly basis. 

And this is that last PM I mentioned, which had me slapping my head:

Quote
Gratitude sir 🙏🙌 for letting me slide in your DM, happy new year. 

Please accept my early apology, sir. Pardon my ignorance for still requesting a review after reading your last topic. 

I discovered your thread in November 2022, but then my account had just a few posts. It is so unlucky for me that you are not accepting applications anymore. But can I still request a review or advice even if merit won't be coming soon? I will gladly appreciate any advice you have to give me concerning my posting style. Your advice is profitable to direct too. Thank

"Pardon my ignorance for still requesting a review".  Amazing.  Guys, I'm not kidding.  I might be generous with merits and some of you might think I'm a swell guy, but I don't suffer fools gladly.  And if you take a look at some of my posts from 2017 and earlier, you'll see that I'm actually a complete bastard.  I've mellowed out at bit, but it doesn't take much to awaken the beast if you know what I mean.
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
January 02, 2023, 11:56:33 PM
#60
I think it’s the whole lots of PMs that actually made you forgot some. Now where I seem confused is, Is there a chance for members that PMed in the month of November to get a post reviewed after been skipped or does that simply tells the member he didn’t meets the new requirements for review.
Is this on behalf of yourself who has contacted the OP requesting a review?
If yes, then you will get the answer later because the OP has his own decision in seeing and reading every incoming message.



If you've looked at Zaguru12's merit stats before, you can see that the OP gave him a decent amount of merit in November. I don't think Zaguru12 wrote about himself. But at the same time, when I accidentally stumbled upon this thread, I realized that the OP is literally being abused here, as his goodwill for giving merit seems to be turning into a requirement to rate every post he was given a link to.
Do you understand the concept of "modesty," PM writers? Why not play fair and earn merit in front of everyone?
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 791
Bitcoin To The Moon 📈📈📈
January 02, 2023, 02:45:27 PM
#59
-skip-.

I think it’s the whole lots of PMs that actually made you forgot some. Now where I seem confused is, Is there a chance for members that PMed in the month of November to get a post reviewed after been skipped or does that simply tells the member he didn’t meets the new requirements for review.
It was the OP's decision, so I also did the same PM to TSC in August but but I didn't show the post that he wanted to review for that reason why my message was ignored or my post was not appropriate then of course I respect the OP's decision because he himself decide who knows better.

So don't be confused even if you get sMerit from TSC then it's worth it if not then it has to be upgraded again, (this is just my opinion)

Don't worry that the OP is always willing to give benefits to every post that is worthy.
You can read for yourself the OP's answer to one of the offers that came above your post.
That's right, OP never gets tired of giving sMerit to those who deserve it, even today there were 3 people getting sMerit, so if it hasn't, maybe there's no proper order.

But back again all the decisions of the OP are entitled to it.
hero member
Activity: 1540
Merit: 772
January 02, 2023, 02:16:33 PM
#58
I think it’s the whole lots of PMs that actually made you forgot some. Now where I seem confused is, Is there a chance for members that PMed in the month of November to get a post reviewed after been skipped or does that simply tells the member he didn’t meets the new requirements for review.
Is this on behalf of yourself who has contacted the OP requesting a review?
If yes, then you will get the answer later because the OP has his own decision in seeing and reading every incoming message.

Don't worry that the OP is always willing to give benefits to every post that is worthy.
You can read for yourself the OP's answer to one of the offers that came above your post.

Maybe he is currently resting, especially since it is still in the atmosphere of the New Year holidays.

I think you understand what I mean and I also don't want to interfere further because more or less we already understand how the OP takes a stand.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 952
January 02, 2023, 12:54:02 AM
#57
I believe you (and still haven't checked my PMs since I posted earlier today, and as far as you go I made it clear I'll continue to do monthly reviews if you keep PMing me.

And speaking of reviews, I'm off to un-ignore a whole bunch of sections and pick up wherever the hell it was that I left off when I took the longer-than-expected break from doing them.  I've presently got over 500 source sMerits, so that should be plenty for a while.

Edit:

After reviewing another member's posts, I went back and saw that you had indeed sent me a PM this month--I must have been doing all the requests after yours (doh!!!).  I sincerely apologize for that.  Doing your review now.

I think it’s the whole lots of PMs that actually made you forgot some. Now where I seem confused is, Is there a chance for members that PMed in the month of November to get a post reviewed after been skipped or does that simply tells the member he didn’t meets the new requirements for review.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
January 01, 2023, 03:37:05 AM
#56
I can you some next month.
No, don't worry about it--but I appreciate the offer.  I'd prefer to earn my merits because of my posting and not as a means to redistribute sMerits among sources.

And wouldn't you know I just got a PM from a member who specifically said they were following this thread but apparently missed the big red, large-font qualifications for continuing to get reviews from me, because they hadn't been getting reviews from me since September and yet asked if I would do one for them. 

That member's PMs are now blocked, by the way.  I hope anyone who reads this post will keep that in mind when contemplating sending me a message asking for a review yet not meeting the criteria I laid out.
legendary
Activity: 4256
Merit: 8551
'The right to privacy matters'
December 31, 2022, 06:56:40 PM
#55
Although not implicitly asking for a review in December, because in the end all decisions are yours and that means we have to respect whatever decision you have made.
I believe you (and still haven't checked my PMs since I posted earlier today, and as far as you go I made it clear I'll continue to do monthly reviews if you keep PMing me.

And speaking of reviews, I'm off to un-ignore a whole bunch of sections and pick up wherever the hell it was that I left off when I took the longer-than-expected break from doing them.  I've presently got over 500 source sMerits, so that should be plenty for a while.

Edit:

After reviewing another member's posts, I went back and saw that you had indeed sent me a PM this month--I must have been doing all the requests after yours (doh!!!).  I sincerely apologize for that.  Doing your review now.

I can you some next month.

I am at 1000 plus merits. I am looking to get numbers lower.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
December 30, 2022, 01:43:33 PM
#54
Although not implicitly asking for a review in December, because in the end all decisions are yours and that means we have to respect whatever decision you have made.
I believe you (and still haven't checked my PMs since I posted earlier today, and as far as you go I made it clear I'll continue to do monthly reviews if you keep PMing me.

And speaking of reviews, I'm off to un-ignore a whole bunch of sections and pick up wherever the hell it was that I left off when I took the longer-than-expected break from doing them.  I've presently got over 500 source sMerits, so that should be plenty for a while.

Edit:

After reviewing another member's posts, I went back and saw that you had indeed sent me a PM this month--I must have been doing all the requests after yours (doh!!!).  I sincerely apologize for that.  Doing your review now.
hero member
Activity: 1722
Merit: 895
December 30, 2022, 01:33:14 PM
#53
Because the last time you got a review was in October, of course you are still in the category presented in the post above. This means you can still PM him and ask him to do a review, but I totally understand why The Skeptical Chymist doesn't want to accept new requests at this time. After all, he did this for free to the bitcointalk community, and I can only agree that no one has the right to force him. Give him a time, and actually anyone can rank up and earn merit even if The Skeptical Chymist doesn't review their posts.

You know, here's one of the reasons: Lack of post quality as expected.
It can be said that everyone who has benefited from the results of the review conducted by The Skeptical Chymist will continue to improve the quality of their posts, because most people think they will continue to get the opportunity to be reviewed again, even though sometimes the quality drops slightly or is not included in the desired category, and I also don't know if I fall into the category that will be reviewed again.

That's right...!!!!
Nothing can force him to continue reviewing the user who sent him a PM. But in my opinion, what he did was enough to help many people to increase Rank.

Like what I said before
>snip
>snip
That's not how I'm saying this works.  If a member has requested reviews from me in September, October, and November then I will continue to accept reminders on a monthly basis.  Lizarder had posts merited by me in September and October, but I don't know if he sent me a PM in November or December or if I was already severely backed up at that point and something got lost in the chaos.  I'd have to go back and look at my PMs--but in any case, for him he's close enough to having fulfilled my criteria so assuming there's still a PM in my inbox I'll get to him eventually.

Ugh.  I meant to start reviewing posts today, but time kind of slipped away from me.  Tomorrow, I swear!
Actually, I regularly sent PMs to you, starting in September and October but both have been reviewed, whereas in December I sent PMs again but not implicitly asking for a review, but congratulating you on changing your new name to (The Skeptical Chymist). As someone who has provided assistance to me, it is only fitting that I send these congratulations.

Although not implicitly asking for a review in December, because in the end all decisions are yours and that means we have to respect whatever decision you have made.
Pages:
Jump to: