Gambling an activity for fun also has the chance to turn someone's fortune. Calculated risk when taken in gambling can be the way to big wins from gambling. Who do you think should take more risk in gambling? The rich gambler or the gambler who is not yet rich. If a rich gambler takes risks in gambling, they are risking losing money and becoming poor from gambling, or getting richer, when a gambler who is not yet rich gambles, they can also get poorer or richer, so the gambler who should take the risk should be the gambler who can handle the dangers of the risk like losing too. When a rich gambler loses from taking a risk, there is a better chance of them being in a position to manage with the losses, than someone struggling financially who a big loss will really affect. So, I am confused after asking myself this question and answering it, does this mean a poor gambler should continue to play it safe in gambling? With no risk, how can a poor gambler change their fortune in gambling?
Rich gamblers have enough capital to be able to last longer while in the game, but it all depends on their individual character, if they gamble just for fun of course they will not expect to get back the money they have spent when experiencing consecutive defeats and can limit them because the goal is to seek pleasure
In contrast to the poor gambler, if he gambles to get income to change his life, he will never get it because he gambles with ambition and will continue to chase big wins, This will result in continuing to do it and feeling addicted which will have an even worse impact on him.
Luck in gambling will come automatically depending on the purpose of gambling and the characteristics of the person playing it