Topic: Roadmap VS Quality - page 3. (Read 457 times)
For me it's better for the team to make reasonable delay and they deliver the perfect form of the project.They must let the the investor know what is the development progress of the project step by step though.By delivering the perfect form of the project,it will make a new investor to join and make that project very popular.But,if they release it with many defect,investor will run away and abandoning that project one by one.
What do you think is more important for a project: to deliver everything in time, even though the quality will be lower; or make reasonable delays but deliver a really nice project that the team is confident in?
That is a tough question. Quality is of course the most important thing in my opinion, but there is no such thing as perfection. So if you keep searching for it, there are chances that you will never end up delivering anything, and the ideas get lost. You need a commitment between those two things and see what your public needs. Keep delivering things that are stable, even though they are not perfect yet, and keep that perfection as a goal for future development.
Still, I think it's impossible to make such distinctions, because both factors are very important. It is important that the project team act within the framework of the roadmap and that all this is done qualitatively
I think that most important to work on the project and if delays with implementation of roadmap points have the uderstandable reason it is ok. But if we have not any updates from the team and answer on investors question - just silence - it is looks like scam. So my answer quality is more important, but devs should be in connection with community.
yes communication is important too. I joined x project, although it is good project with good team, but sometimes it's poor in communication. silent telegram in more than 3 weeks without explanation can reduce my trust in that good project
Wow 3 weeks .. that is not just poor communication, that is no communication at all
What do you think is more important for a project: to deliver everything in time, even though the quality will be lower; or make reasonable delays but deliver a really nice project that the team is confident in?
Roadmap use to created by every ICO comes to market but quality cannot assure that everyone will give us for sure. Please make sure that project have the good development team in the market and their companies focus about the blockchain technology.
At last they will using the best promotion team and use signature campaign here in the forum. You will get the best quality after that.
I think that most important to work on the project and if delays with implementation of roadmap points have the uderstandable reason it is ok. But if we have not any updates from the team and answer on investors question - just silence - it is looks like scam. So my answer quality is more important, but devs should be in connection with community.
yes communication is important too. I joined x project, although it is good project with good team, but sometimes it's poor in communication. silent telegram in more than 3 weeks without explanation can reduce my trust in that good project
What do you think is more important for a project: to deliver everything in time, even though the quality will be lower; or make reasonable delays but deliver a really nice project that the team is confident in?
I would prefer the delay rather than a deliver in time but has low quality specially if it is a security issue. It is easier to tell the community that we will have a delay to make sure that the security will not be compromised than to have a crap work and later own the community will find out that your work is a piece of shit. What do you think is more important for a project: to deliver everything in time, even though the quality will be lower;
I'll go with the quality, I don't care if they will deliver their road map late as long as quality is at its finest.Yeah. However, have just thought that on the other hand, road map is one of the first documents that potential investors rely on, while making a decision on investing. So road map should be solid, but as I ve stated many times before, at the final stages of development road map is no more the most important think.
What do you think is more important for a project: to deliver everything in time, even though the quality will be lower; or make reasonable delays but deliver a really nice project that the team is confident in?
I think that most important to work on the project and if delays with implementation of roadmap points have the uderstandable reason it is ok. But if we have not any updates from the team and answer on investors question - just silence - it is looks like scam. So my answer quality is more important, but devs should be in connection with community.
What do you think is more important for a project: to deliver everything in time, even though the quality will be lower; or make reasonable delays but deliver a really nice project that the team is confident in?
It should be balance,quality over quantity will be the best,we do not want to rush any projects and then will only fail use at the very end.We are investing only to those who has potentials to grow so that we can have a lot of gains with the help of the project.Probability of success and failure should be exact,project managers and developers on each project should be synchronized or else they wont achieve success. What do you think is more important for a project: to deliver everything in time, even though the quality will be lower; or make reasonable delays but deliver a really nice project that the team is confident in?
First of all professinal developer won't provide low quality product. He'll better delay release date, but no low quality. Low quality = unsafe.About roadmaps. I think roadmap have to be simple and realizable. Simple because it's made for investors, always they are not well expirienced in IT (I mean technical detailes).
Roadmaps may contain a lot of useless (for investors understanding) detailes which may overload you. And you may draw a false conclusion.
For your question I'd like to say that first of all it have to be clear for your understanding. Why does delay happend. Trusted projects always inform about delays and reason. Ofcourse many delays are bad for project reputation.
Absolutely quality is the essential datum that should be attentively fixed because it's the major issue that controls any project success .
Even if it takes more time , but the results will be much better than the other option ( you cited ) because a low quality project will never last & it will be progressively abandoned ( PS : it may get some viral interests at the beginning but as I said it can't last )
Even if it takes more time , but the results will be much better than the other option ( you cited ) because a low quality project will never last & it will be progressively abandoned ( PS : it may get some viral interests at the beginning but as I said it can't last )
What do you think is more important for a project: to deliver everything in time, even though the quality will be lower;
I'll go with the quality, I don't care if they will deliver their road map late as long as quality is at its finest.or make reasonable delays but deliver a really nice project that the team is confident in?
I'll choose this one as long it is reasonable and they are doing actually with their reasons there's no problem with me. Others might consider the delivery date and followed the road map but in the end that project will suffer because of its lack of quality. The quality is better. Even if a project has a great roadmap which they always delivery on time, I do believe that the quality will affect the project more. The better the quality is, the better the project is. Try to invest your money in a project which has a great team which has a lot of experience
Exactly. That is what im trying to say.
The quality is better. Even if a project has a great roadmap which they always delivery on time, I do believe that the quality will affect the project more. The better the quality is, the better the project is. Try to invest your money in a project which has a great team which has a lot of experience
ROAD MAP = DREAMS
Unless the difficult parts of the road map have been completed or there is HARD evidence the dev team can complete these parts it is just a bunch of promises and dreams.
there are perhaps 20-30 real proven dev teams on this entire board that are capable of producing something of real interest and not just something btc can do
Unless the difficult parts of the road map have been completed or there is HARD evidence the dev team can complete these parts it is just a bunch of promises and dreams.
there are perhaps 20-30 real proven dev teams on this entire board that are capable of producing something of real interest and not just something btc can do
Haha. That definetely depends on a team. For some teams deadlines are dreams indeed, for some I would rather call them goals
Obviously the most important thing is the quality. The project will never succeed if it is not working or it is much worse then its competitors. The other thing is that if you need to take more time the whole project should be transparent. Lack of communications between devs and community will bring the token to the ground before team will show any results while some good articles and updates about it may rise it better then an actual result. Unfortunately not every project care about the price of its coin after they raised money on ICO.
Agree. Transperancy and good communication is a key to success. But sometimes it is difficult to tell about wvery single change team undertakes during the working process, may be that is why many investors consider that they are being scammed because of that. But still quality cannot be sacrificed for time.
ROAD MAP = DREAMS
Unless the difficult parts of the road map have been completed or there is HARD evidence the dev team can complete these parts it is just a bunch of promises and dreams.
there are perhaps 20-30 real proven dev teams on this entire board that are capable of producing something of real interest and not just something btc can do
Unless the difficult parts of the road map have been completed or there is HARD evidence the dev team can complete these parts it is just a bunch of promises and dreams.
there are perhaps 20-30 real proven dev teams on this entire board that are capable of producing something of real interest and not just something btc can do
Obviously the most important thing is the quality. The project will never succeed if it is not working or it is much worse then its competitors. The other thing is that if you need to take more time the whole project should be transparent. Lack of communications between devs and community will bring the token to the ground before team will show any results while some good articles and updates about it may rise it better then an actual result. Unfortunately not every project care about the price of its coin after they raised money on ICO.
I guess that is theproblem if many icos now. They try to meet public interests and fulfill their stated deadlines usually without any significant content. And it's a pitty for me that most investors also go for time rather than quality
Jump to: