Pages:
Author

Topic: Rollbit.com | Crypto's Most Rewarding Casino 👑 - page 77. (Read 62272 times)

legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1494
Pie Baking Contest: https://tinyurl.com/2s3z6dee
I bet the only reason that you didnt go for the usual anytime goalscorer would be because the odds for Haaland to score is pretty low? lol. Normally you would have gone for something unusal like De Bruyne or Foden to score instead of Haaland though.

P.S : you should PM me that uncensored screenshot as I am curious with your stake  Roll Eyes

Well arall, let me tell you something. YES. The answer is yes lmao. The odds of him to score 1 goal is extremely low, it's not worth it comparing to the risk. And the other fact, honestly I bet Grealish to score and create an assist lol. Luckily while I lost the scorer bet, his assist saved my ass Grin Well, you would be disappointed if I reveal the stake, because I don't bet big on a speculation bets such as goalscorer and assist. On tonight game, I bet Kvaratskhelia and Valverde to score, along with Osimhen and Vinicius lol. Wish me luck bud!
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1403
I had a good winning last night where I picked Haaland to score 2 goals. Due to his not so good performance in domestic tournaments and in the 1st leg before this game, I believed it could be his turning point to score at least 2 goals. Damn, he made 5!



I bet the only reason that you didnt go for the usual anytime goalscorer would be because the odds for Haaland to score is pretty low? lol. Normally you would have gone for something unusal like De Bruyne or Foden to score instead of Haaland though.

P.S : you should PM me that uncensored screenshot as I am curious with your stake  Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 577
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
I've seen weirder requests from other companies like asking the customer to take a selfie or a photo from the street were you live.
Requesting a video call is becoming one of the mandatory requirements to complete identity verification. I believe it's needed to confirm that the submitted documents actually belong to the one accessing the account.
Besides, if someone is OK with submitting his documents and revealing his identity, why would he refuse to make the video call?! Anyway, it looks like the accuser doesn't mind doing it.
such a method crosses the line actually if you have to be asked to provide a photo of where we live, in my opinion submitting documents is far more sufficient than having to do things that have crossed the line like that especially selfies and videos are also strong enough, but if there is a casino who asked to submit a photo of where we live obviously that was crossing the line, of course I will never play in that casino again.
Actually, for KYC problems, I don't mind if it's really needed for something that is needed, such as large withdrawals, as some cases have happened.
But for KYC asking for a video call or sending a photo of a residence, I'm a little bit disapproving, but if that's really the condition for solving the problem and being able to withdraw all the big funds or big winning funds from the gambling platform, I'll be happy to do it for the sake of being able to withdraw my funds.
But even though there are some people who are willing to do KYC by video calling or sending photos of their residence, it would be better if they didn't need KYC like that.
Because for some people who do not agree with the KYC request they feel disturbed or find it troublesome.
If Selfie is asked to upload then it can be at anywhere depending on the location and the place you are at the moment, so if it is on the road, in the car, or in the room they would see it and accept it. My brother, if the amount to withdraw is big and they need the KYC to clarify everything before allowing you to withdraw the money, it is better you do it to withdraw the money before they changed their mind because this casino owners are always looking for one thing to the other to decline and cancel large withdrawal.

But I don't really like casinos stressing someone at the time of withdrawing his win with KYC. KYC would done before the withdrawal so things will be easy for the gambler to do.
legendary
Activity: 1960
Merit: 2124
The reason why Rollbit was able to maintained a good reputation here because they're fast to resolved the issue if the accusation is legit.
The issues can always be there but the legit casino is the one who resolved it and allow players to withdraw the amount which Rollbit has done always so this is why they came under legit casino list.There are false accusations against most casino which Rollbit has also faced in past but they should be ignored like trolls.
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1494
Pie Baking Contest: https://tinyurl.com/2s3z6dee
I had a good winning last night where I picked Haaland to score 2 goals. Due to his not so good performance in domestic tournaments and in the 1st leg before this game, I believed it could be his turning point to score at least 2 goals. Damn, he made 5!

[img width=600]https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/17/blob98240cbae68260ce.png[/img]
hero member
Activity: 2884
Merit: 629
Rollbit take good care of their business and they will solve if there's something that affecting their business.
The reason why Rollbit was able to maintained a good reputation here because they're fast to resolved the issue if the accusation is legit.

So have you heard about the latest daily bonus by Rollbit? They have given out the second largest daily bonus of all time worth $172,748.48 to a hidden user which is really amazing to see and for more updates check this out : Twitter
Yes that's a huge amount (yet only the second of the largest), the user is indeed lucky. They're also giving away free funds ($100) by just simply posting your Rollbit's username. Who knows you'll be one of the lucky user.
legendary
Activity: 1960
Merit: 2124
So have you heard about the latest daily bonus by Rollbit? They have given out the second largest daily bonus of all time worth $172,748.48 to a hidden user which is really amazing to see and for more updates check this out : Twitter

hero member
Activity: 2744
Merit: 541
Campaign Management?"Hhampuz" is the Man
But even though there are some people who are willing to do KYC by video calling or sending photos of their residence, it would be better if they didn't need KYC like that.
Because for some people who do not agree with the KYC request they feel disturbed or find it troublesome.
If they are comfortable in compromising their privacy to that extent they are good to go but Rollbit don't have any such requirements asking you to upload a selfie on the road I assume so players on this platform need not to worry about it.Moreover for big whales you have to undergo more documents and on small scale you can gamble without any hastle.
I can't imagine taking your selfie on the road, that can't justify your identity so probably not a thing with Rollbit.
Whales have a separate KYC process for sure, and they have to cooperate if they really want to gamble with Rollbit. Anyway, there's an issue that Rollbit asked for a video call and I think it's already solve. See, once you cooperate with the site after being tagged as suspicious, you can assure that the site will investigate it fairly, just don't panic and cooperate.
There are issues sometimes but if you are right on your part and casino you are gambling upon is totally legit you don't need to worry a lot as your case will be resolved at best.I am small gambler and comfortable with low level KYC and withdraw small amounts but Rollbit don't press it too much on you over these matters.

Yes, if you cooperate with whatever issue, you got the chance that it will resolve sooner, I understand that most whales do some
good research before sending their money into any casino they will be playing.

Knowing how they will take some edge and how they will enjoy the games that they will be playing.

Rollbit take good care of their business and they will solve if there's something that affecting their business.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1096
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
But even though there are some people who are willing to do KYC by video calling or sending photos of their residence, it would be better if they didn't need KYC like that.
Because for some people who do not agree with the KYC request they feel disturbed or find it troublesome.
If they are comfortable in compromising their privacy to that extent they are good to go but Rollbit don't have any such requirements asking you to upload a selfie on the road I assume so players on this platform need not to worry about it.Moreover for big whales you have to undergo more documents and on small scale you can gamble without any hastle.
I can't imagine taking your selfie on the road, that can't justify your identity so probably not a thing with Rollbit.
Whales have a separate KYC process for sure, and they have to cooperate if they really want to gamble with Rollbit. Anyway, there's an issue that Rollbit asked for a video call and I think it's already solve. See, once you cooperate with the site after being tagged as suspicious, you can assure that the site will investigate it fairly, just don't panic and cooperate.
There are issues sometimes but if you are right on your part and casino you are gambling upon is totally legit you don't need to worry a lot as your case will be resolved at best.I am small gambler and comfortable with low level KYC and withdraw small amounts but Rollbit don't press it too much on you over these matters.
What's one of a kind, though? Onling gambling. It's like a parallel universe with its own set of rules and residents from all walks of life. The most important aspect of online casinos is that they provide a secure and enjoyable environment for players of all experience levels. Rollbit is on top of things; you won't have to worry about KYC or withdrawals. This strengthens the casino's relationship with its customers and encourages them to return. We have an obligation to the online casinos we patronize as upstanding members of this community. Therefore, we should all give it up for Rollbit, who has been holding it down.
full member
Activity: 1834
Merit: 166
But even though there are some people who are willing to do KYC by video calling or sending photos of their residence, it would be better if they didn't need KYC like that.
Because for some people who do not agree with the KYC request they feel disturbed or find it troublesome.
If they are comfortable in compromising their privacy to that extent they are good to go but Rollbit don't have any such requirements asking you to upload a selfie on the road I assume so players on this platform need not to worry about it.Moreover for big whales you have to undergo more documents and on small scale you can gamble without any hastle.
I can't imagine taking your selfie on the road, that can't justify your identity so probably not a thing with Rollbit.
Whales have a separate KYC process for sure, and they have to cooperate if they really want to gamble with Rollbit. Anyway, there's an issue that Rollbit asked for a video call and I think it's already solve. See, once you cooperate with the site after being tagged as suspicious, you can assure that the site will investigate it fairly, just don't panic and cooperate.
There are issues sometimes but if you are right on your part and casino you are gambling upon is totally legit you don't need to worry a lot as your case will be resolved at best.I am small gambler and comfortable with low level KYC and withdraw small amounts but Rollbit don't press it too much on you over these matters.
legendary
Activity: 1960
Merit: 2124
The truth seems to me very well that Rollbit has handled that with great measure, it seems to me that it was handled in a very professional way not to say which was the provider or the slot machine, this is a guarantee that the casino is very worthy of admiration, now well I am glad that this type of bug or vulnerability has been detected in time, this avoids many problems in the near future, and above all that they have shared it on twitter because any player who has used this vulnerability and has won a considerable sum of money and If they hadn't paid for it, it would have turned into big problems.

They timely manage the slot provider to get more exploited and drain funds out of their pockets but they must have an idea about how many players have exploited vulnerability but they also didn't have idea about it as they might be happy to hit high multipliers on each spin but don't know what actions can be taken against them.
full member
Activity: 2086
Merit: 193
But even though there are some people who are willing to do KYC by video calling or sending photos of their residence, it would be better if they didn't need KYC like that.
Because for some people who do not agree with the KYC request they feel disturbed or find it troublesome.
If they are comfortable in compromising their privacy to that extent they are good to go but Rollbit don't have any such requirements asking you to upload a selfie on the road I assume so players on this platform need not to worry about it.Moreover for big whales you have to undergo more documents and on small scale you can gamble without any hastle.
I can't imagine taking your selfie on the road, that can't justify your identity so probably not a thing with Rollbit.
Whales have a separate KYC process for sure, and they have to cooperate if they really want to gamble with Rollbit. Anyway, there's an issue that Rollbit asked for a video call and I think it's already solve. See, once you cooperate with the site after being tagged as suspicious, you can assure that the site will investigate it fairly, just don't panic and cooperate.
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1848
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Rollbit confirmed it through their Twitter account a few hours ago so it really was, and rollbit has also taken steps to handle it and confirmed all their funds are safe and rollbit also didn't mention the game provider or slot name, https://twitter.com/rollbitcom/status/1629221627362701315
thankfully this could be detected right away because if not big losses could be experienced by rollbit

The truth seems to me very well that Rollbit has handled that with great measure, it seems to me that it was handled in a very professional way not to say which was the provider or the slot machine, this is a guarantee that the casino is very worthy of admiration, now well I am glad that this type of bug or vulnerability has been detected in time, this avoids many problems in the near future, and above all that they have shared it on twitter because any player who has used this vulnerability and has won a considerable sum of money and If they hadn't paid for it, it would have turned into big problems.
legendary
Activity: 1960
Merit: 2124
But even though there are some people who are willing to do KYC by video calling or sending photos of their residence, it would be better if they didn't need KYC like that.
Because for some people who do not agree with the KYC request they feel disturbed or find it troublesome.
If they are comfortable in compromising their privacy to that extent they are good to go but Rollbit don't have any such requirements asking you to upload a selfie on the road I assume so players on this platform need not to worry about it.Moreover for big whales you have to undergo more documents and on small scale you can gamble without any hastle.
hero member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 504
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I've seen weirder requests from other companies like asking the customer to take a selfie or a photo from the street were you live.
Requesting a video call is becoming one of the mandatory requirements to complete identity verification. I believe it's needed to confirm that the submitted documents actually belong to the one accessing the account.
Besides, if someone is OK with submitting his documents and revealing his identity, why would he refuse to make the video call?! Anyway, it looks like the accuser doesn't mind doing it.
such a method crosses the line actually if you have to be asked to provide a photo of where we live, in my opinion submitting documents is far more sufficient than having to do things that have crossed the line like that especially selfies and videos are also strong enough, but if there is a casino who asked to submit a photo of where we live obviously that was crossing the line, of course I will never play in that casino again.
Actually, for KYC problems, I don't mind if it's really needed for something that is needed, such as large withdrawals, as some cases have happened.
But for KYC asking for a video call or sending a photo of a residence, I'm a little bit disapproving, but if that's really the condition for solving the problem and being able to withdraw all the big funds or big winning funds from the gambling platform, I'll be happy to do it for the sake of being able to withdraw my funds.
But even though there are some people who are willing to do KYC by video calling or sending photos of their residence, it would be better if they didn't need KYC like that.
Because for some people who do not agree with the KYC request they feel disturbed or find it troublesome.
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1112
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I've seen weirder requests from other companies like asking the customer to take a selfie or a photo from the street were you live.
Requesting a video call is becoming one of the mandatory requirements to complete identity verification. I believe it's needed to confirm that the submitted documents actually belong to the one accessing the account.
Besides, if someone is OK with submitting his documents and revealing his identity, why would he refuse to make the video call?! Anyway, it looks like the accuser doesn't mind doing it.
such a method crosses the line actually if you have to be asked to provide a photo of where we live, in my opinion submitting documents is far more sufficient than having to do things that have crossed the line like that especially selfies and videos are also strong enough, but if there is a casino who asked to submit a photo of where we live obviously that was crossing the line, of course I will never play in that casino again.
My nation only asks for a proof with a bill that you pay. Like lets say you have internet right? We all do, then it could be on your name as well? In that case a bill with your name on it, that shows your address is there already.

So, you take a picture of your internet bill, your name, your address, your ID number, everything will be given to the company that way with a single picture and they will not need anything else. If they want to take it further, the max they will do is a picture of your ID with the Bill side by side, that's it, nothing more. That's literally the hardest thing I have seen some companies ask, nothing more, and obviously some people don't want to, but I am okay with it tbf.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
FOCUS
..
you didn't get my response right. If you are OK with providing you documents, why do you disagree to make a video call! Your identity have been already disclosed the moment you've uploaded your gov. I'd.
Something is not matching here! Let's wait for more proofs.
The experience in providing an ID, taking selfie and doing a video call is different from each other especially if you are like me who is a camera shy person, A person who doesn't like being on a lens and being seen. I'm just saying that for me it's an awkward moment to videocall a stranger especially if they you can't see the person who is calling you. We have our own insecurities and those insecurities sometimes doesn't show up in our provided documents. I'm talking about the face value here. I understand that casino's need to collect our identity but reaching to the point that we need to video call them for the sake of verification is too much for me personally.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1403
Life, Love and Laughter...
..
you didn't get my response right. If you are OK with providing you documents, why do you disagree to make a video call! Your identity have been already disclosed the moment you've uploaded your gov. I'd.
Something is not matching here! Let's wait for more proofs.

I'd hate to go through a video call too.  I mean who wouldn't?  It's a hassle.  But I have never in my life experienced it in all my days of dealing with exchanges, poker sites and sports betting sites both fiat and crypto.  Maybe in my case it never really needed to go up to that point cos if an exchange or a gambling site is asking for a video call after you uploaded your passport or driver's license...  Something is up.  So you better make sure your face matches the the pic in the ID or you say good bye to your money.  :/
hero member
Activity: 2786
Merit: 646
I'm sorry for posting this here, but as it is a serious complaint I was interested to know from the OP if this is true, here is the complaint:

Rollbit Withdrawal Frozen For $12,800 & No Response

I've seen many accusations so this is something normal, but in this story there is something that made me worried and that is the part where the person who is accusing the casino says that after making KYC the casino asked him to make a video call with him , and seriously? Is handing over documents and taking a selfie holding documents not enough for KYC? honestly if a casino asks for video call then that casino is at a very high level of KYC and for me this requirement is scary
Was actually tending to mention out that thread on this ANN about that accusation which it is really that something not that common if we do speak about kyc verifications + having that video call kind of requirement. OP didnt mention nor do shows about screenshot of discussion or interaction with the support team and this is why its not really that something to be that believable unless if he could show
off some solid evidences like those hold up withdrawals and conversation then it would really be just proving out that there's something wrong with Rollbit.
Im not defending Rollbit just because im a sigcamp participant but having that 12k deposit and some withdrawals with that amount is really just too small
for them to mess up their reputation.

my point is not even the fact that the casino did not allow the OP to withdraw the money, Rollbit.com is a good casino and it seems to me honest and that they are here to do business for the long term and also the accuser's attitude is without a doubt that it is a suspicious attitude, because one of the most obvious things in this matter of money laundering is when a person takes 10,000$ for example and deposits 10,000$ on a site, but only plays with 1000$ and wins 800$ and then withdraws 10,800$ from any site will suspect that this person is doing money laundering, which is why I think Rollbit.com is right to ask for KYC. that's not why I was shocked

what scares me is asking for a video call when there are so many quick, reliable and less evasive methods of doing KYC, the casino can use the KYC method that skrill used, which consisted of the person handing in an ID and then the person had to scan it of face and the application compared the face of the ID that the person provided with the face of the scan, it was something that didn't even take 10 minutes for the KYC to be complete, finally I apologize immensely for addressing this in this thread, I just think the video call is exaggerated and also somewhat time consuming, if they have 100 people to do KYC at the casino and they have to video call, then it will take months for each customer to complete KYC and make withdrawals
Well, i did really get your point which i could say that it is really that ideal if we do speak about the swiftness on how KYC should really be done rather than on manually making up that videocall individually.

As for the situation occured then i didnt able to think about money laundering possibilities but now that you had mentioned then it is likely to be on this way on which that someone who complained is the
one whose trying out to withdraw and amount which he/she do believes that he could pull off those deposits with ease without having that wagering requirement been hit up.
If thats the case then he's the one who do had commit out such mistake and not the site.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1403
Life, Love and Laughter...
I'm sorry for posting this here, but as it is a serious complaint I was interested to know from the OP if this is true, here is the complaint:

Rollbit Withdrawal Frozen For $12,800 & No Response

I've seen many accusations so this is something normal, but in this story there is something that made me worried and that is the part where the person who is accusing the casino says that after making KYC the casino asked him to make a video call with him , and seriously? Is handing over documents and taking a selfie holding documents not enough for KYC? honestly if a casino asks for video call then that casino is at a very high level of KYC and for me this requirement is scary

Did you read his post?  He made a deposit of 12k and made a bet of 1k which won 800 bucks and decided to withdraw the whole thing.  You being a Stake user of all people should know that it would raise a red flag for the account.  From sports betting site's point of view, it's like the site is being used as a mixer of sorts.  I mean try doing the same thing at Stake or any book for that matter and I'm pretty sure the account would be flagged too.  And if a site is not doing it as a standard security measure then I'd call the site sketchy.
Pages:
Jump to: