Topic: Roobet.com | Art Contest - $5000 Prizepool up for grabs! Ends August 31st - page 7. (Read 6244 times)

Here is my vector art drawing :p

https://i.imgur.com/enjnW7a.png

Roobet user id : Azarnob

Roobet Coin

Roobet Username: onecall123

Thanks!

"Waiting for a PVP game" - sabotag3x

Here is my art work...

Roobet Username: Cornia

Quoted )

Quote for viewing.

My entry
https://iili.io/dUUHSs.png

Good day everyone!

Here's my artwork and I hope you like it 

This artwork of mine was inspired to a work of one of the legendary painter Edvard Munch "the scream" (1893)

I called this piece "Mr. Roo Scream"

Here's the process and by the way my meduim is Autodesk Skectchbook.




username: ObitoUchiha

My entry for this Contest, took a little while to finish this due to my busy schedule but I think I'm right on time.

Going back to the old school, I've learn this during my High school level (Jr. Level) and its good to do this again.  

A wooden Embroidery hoop, and cross stitch.


MY HOOP ART - MR. ROO LOGO







username: samcrypto

Ends in a week! Get your entries in NOW

Edit:

Hhampuz, I'm very sorry for adding one more off topic post, but I have to clarify few things regarding plagiarism here.

Tbh, I dislike law, since it could be twisted by some people who want to take advantage of it, whether they are right or wrong. But yes, getting inspiration from other design to make your own, even just modifying some little parts of existed design to be yours is allowed by law, as long as it's not for commercial use. But why there are people or companies that copying or plagiarizing design obviously not punished by the law even tho they use it commercially? One, its because of the extremely high legal cost, which even if you win the case, it might doesn't cover all of cost you have spent. Two, the owner of original design has much larger business than the copycat, so filing a lawsuit would waste time and money.

E.g. you must know that there are Nike copycats around the world with slightly different name or some tweak on the swoosh logo. But as you can see Nike doesn't really care about that since it doesn't affect too much on their worldwide business.

Another example, if you are a designer, you may have heard about the previous Tokyo 2020 Summer Olympic's logo that accused to plagiarize Théâtre de Liège's logo and its designer filed a lawsuit against Olympic Committee. In the end, the designer dropped his lawsuit because of the high cost issue, and the Olympic Committee decided to use new logo that are being using until now. I like how the Olympic Committee handled this issue, as they are a professional organisation and they know "ETHICS". When the original designer dropped his lawsuit, actually the Olympic Committee has full right to continue using the logo by the law, but they are aware that it could impact their image and credibility.


Reference
https://logoblink.com/48-nike-copycat-spoof-logos/
https://www.dezeen.com/2016/01/29/designer-olivier-debie-abandons-plagiarism-lawsuit-tokyo-2020-olympic-logo-theatre-de-liege/

---

Based on these ref... ah damn, I have talked too much again. The point is, enjoy this fun competition with a fair way There are so many submissions already and all of them are so outstanding. Don't be shy guys, let people see your masterpieces! Damn I'm running out of smerit now lol.

Enough!

Keep your artwork coming guys, just little over a week left until this one ends and the winners are decided

I just don't get why you're saying "Parody Art" lmao do you even know about copyright?
Do you paint? Are you an artist? Stop acting all mighty here coz I can provide proof of what I'm saying as "heavy referencing"
This would be my last reply. Lol

Who is arguing? I am not arguing? I am just explaining why I am right.

Do you know what is parody art? it's basically copying a piece and adding a humor elements to it and it is consider legal, that's the case here It's legal as long as you don't copy and paste and add something new, because that is going to turn into forgery. As long as you copy and draw it from scratch it is legal. And again, I am not arguing with you, I am just explaining why I am right and you are wrong.

---

And btw, I don't care about the competition, I am just explaining here that your concept of what's legal and illegal is 100% wrong. In the end the judge will still the one who are going to pick the winner but, that doesn't change the fact that your statement here is wrong, and your allegations is wrong. I am just standing for what is right.

I just got online to pass my roobet review and see this haha. BTW, Goodluck to all of the participants!

---

I am just gonna quote here my answer since Hhampuz said enough, Sorry Hhampuz on creating a side discussion here

---

I know copyright and I know everything about it because I study law, being not an artist doesn't mean I don't have the right to comment about this, that is 'Ad hominem'.

"As long as they don't copy the whole game/movie it is legal"

But the case here is different.
He just copied the artwork itself and that artwork won 1st place last time lol.
Well I don't want to argue anymore, at the end judges will be the one who'll pick their bets.
I'm just speaking for the rest of the participants here. Thank you!

You have no idea on what you are talking about. Copying Ideas, art style etc, is not plagiarism. The only plagiarism that can be do in art is copying the whole piece of a finished artwork, That's why parody in art is legal and can do by anyone! Referencing is legal, copying the style is legal, copying the idea is legal. The only thing that is not legal is copy a piece 100% with no addition and forgery.

There's a whole lot difference between plagiarism in art and literature[word base work]. If you copy and paste in literature then it's plagiarism - that is what's stated in the fact that you have given at Plagiarism.org, but in art there's a whole lot of concept to be consider because it is visual and not base on letter and words.

I know what you are saying, but your knowledge of what is plagiarism and what is legal in art is very wrong.

---

Just look at the movies and games industry, they are just copying ideas of each other as long as they don't copy the whole game/movie it is legal.

Is it valid to entry an artwork with "Heavy referencing" from the winning piece last time?
Also, did the original artist gave you permission to use his idea and concept? If so, then there's no problem with this.
If not, then there will be an issue here.... I guess, plagiarism.

"All of the following are considered plagiarism:
turning in someone else's work as your own. copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit. failing to put a quotation in quotation marks. giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation" - Source: Plagiarism.org
-----
I hope judge would be fair to all artwork that were done by "Conceptualizing" and "Originality"
I personally admire those who tried their best to do original artwork even though they are not skilled enough.

Just dropping my thoughts about this.
Thanks!

quote for viewing image.