I agree, having minors is something you have to accept when you are building an online business, no matter what kind of business it is, minors will always have a way to get in. I remember myself at 18 and under and I was going around in darknet let alone lie about my age, and I have seen things there I will never forget and never got in there ever again in my life, and never will again. ToR browser is done for me, and will never install it on my computer in my entire life. Some things scar you for life, gambling is not one of them. If you are a kid, you shouldn't gamble, but Roobet can't stop them even if they tried, impossible, even with KYC.
They can’t stop them but at least prevented those who are trying to cheat on the site, Roobet might not be able to catch all those minors, with this KYC they can at least lessen them. Well, there’s a lot of minors already exposed to gambling, its really bad that the site forces KYC just to help those minors getting away from gambling. KYC with Roobet has been running for years already, I believe we cannot change this anymore.
The darknet can turn out to be very disturbing if you enter pages that are of that style, that depends on the experience that the person has or what they want to search for, usually on the darknet you get information that you can't normally get on google or on the stage or channel that we normally navigate, but a person must be very careful, however, this is as you say, no player under 18 years of age should enter Rootbet or any other type of online casino, but this is very difficult to control, such and as they had stated before, one of the ways is to be able to make a login record with facial recognition.
Well, I've been at Roobet for a long time, and I can attest that the security in this casino is very good, if they ask me for one more level of KYC, I have no problem giving it, I think that with a closed eye I would give it, just like Roobet would too. for Stake.com, for bitcasino.io,. SB, among other sites, I say this because they are very reliable casinos with an impeccable reputation and it is worth recognizing when a site is really good.
Yes it all depends on our comfort level and if we are not then we should avoid it as Stake doesn't have any KYC option and players prefer there but the security at Roobet is fine but it's just that I am not comfortable with sharing too much documents with anyone and play in limits only.
That is the difference, people who do not want to do it at all could play somewhere else, but people who are fine with it, also could play somewhere else too, there is nothing stopping them. You gave Stake as example, so if you are a person who do not want to share their KYC then you will use them, but if you are fine with giving it... then you can still use Stake, I doubt anyone who feels fine about giving it, would mind not giving it neither.
So all in all, roobet is limiting themselves on people who are fine with it and also like their website all at the same time. This is still allowing them to make a good chunk of money as we have seen, just not as much as they possibly could.
Yes, I understand your point, for some time now I have been reading and watching some videos, and everything is focused on the fact that in the near future we will have very little privacy and anonymity may be coming to an end, I do not know if when we reach full adoption crypto is everything and what you want is to achieve the highest degree of privacy, and for that you have to pay a lot, I think that the casinos will have different positions and the policies can change to be more flexible, the case of roobet and other casinos It may be that they make changes, it is what I imagine can happen and that will be in the near future.
