If we object to KYC, we can choose another casino to play, because as far as I know there are still casinos that haven't asked for KYC, but if the casino is not very familiar to us or new, it would be better to find out about its reputation, becasue if not, instead of avoiding KYC but get scammed by scam casino, because reputation is also important and so far Roobet has proven its reputation.
Not wouldn't hurt for a KYC but hoping that it will just be minimal and there will still be an option for the casino to play but there will be restrictions. No objection to Roobet about this but I guess it's necessary for them to do this as they are getting into expansion and besides they are licensed. 
Topic: Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘 - page 287. (Read 84536 times)
If we object to KYC, we can choose another casino to play, because as far as I know there are still casinos that haven't asked for KYC, but if the casino is not very familiar to us or new, it would be better to find out about its reputation, becasue if not, instead of avoiding KYC but get scammed by scam casino, because reputation is also important and so far Roobet has proven its reputation.
I would rather play in Casino that requires KYC but highly recommended and Legit than sites that does not ask for KYC but may have a chance of being scam.This is what i stand though i am not a fan of sites that ask my details yet i will choose roobet over other site as this is very much tested on my part and have been playing for years now without a single issue.
again we can choose which site to play , we can choose where to deposit , but we can also choose where we are safe to play .
But the thing here is that , do we really have a choice ? as Casinos that runs with cryptocurrencies are now getting regulated by the government around the world?
maybe it is better for us to choose playing in crypto casinos with KYC or play in real life in which nothing to be asked but only our personal coming?
choose because nothing we can do about that .
We will always have a choice. At present, there are plenty of crypto gambling sites that don't require any form of KYC whatsoever. They might ask for your KYC information only if they find something shady related to.your account.maybe it is better for us to choose playing in crypto casinos with KYC or play in real life in which nothing to be asked but only our personal coming?
choose because nothing we can do about that .
More sites might require mandatory KYC in the future as you mentioned, but you will always be able to find other sites that don't require mandatory KYC.
If we object to KYC, we can choose another casino to play, because as far as I know there are still casinos that haven't asked for KYC, but if the casino is not very familiar to us or new, it would be better to find out about its reputation, becasue if not, instead of avoiding KYC but get scammed by scam casino, because reputation is also important and so far Roobet has proven its reputation.
Cryptocurrency market did really get soo much attention due to decentralization or being anonymous and we all here on this forum does hate KYC because we dont like for our personal
informations to get leaked and same as you said that even top secured platforms had some issues about hacking in the past which doesnt guarantee about the safety of those
personal documents that do exposes of your identity which i dont really see for it to be benefit. Is he out of his mind?
maybe it is better for us to choose playing in crypto casinos with KYC or play in real life in which nothing to be asked but only our personal coming?
choose because nothing we can do about that .
There is a benefit on us for those who choose gambling sites that required KYC, We are safe from hackers and fraud users, they also afraid to join a casino the heavily required KYC for some reason.
What the heck are you talking about? Providing your KYC implies that your information could get leaked online of hackers manage to hack the site in question successfully.This means that your information isn't safe at all. Roobet's security is top-class, but this doesn't imply that it's impossible for it to get hacked. Way bigger sites like Binance(Top-class security) etc got hacked in the past.
This is the primary reason why majority of crypto investors including me hate providing KYC unless absolutely necessary.
informations to get leaked and same as you said that even top secured platforms had some issues about hacking in the past which doesnt guarantee about the safety of those
personal documents that do exposes of your identity which i dont really see for it to be benefit. Is he out of his mind?
There is a benefit on us for those who choose gambling sites that required KYC, We are safe from hackers and fraud users, they also afraid to join a casino the heavily required KYC for some reason.
What the heck are you talking about? Providing your KYC implies that your information could get leaked online of hackers manage to hack the site in question successfully.This means that your information isn't safe at all. Roobet's security is top-class, but this doesn't imply that it's impossible for it to get hacked. Way bigger sites like Binance(Top-class security) etc got hacked in the past.
This is the primary reason why majority of crypto investors including me hate providing KYC unless absolutely necessary.
There are so many cases where users struggle with KYC procedures after they invest on the platform. It has been my observation that many popular gambling websites end up denying to pay back the funds in the name of KYC and point out all sorts of ridiculous reasons. Roobet, in that respect, redefines what it means to be royal. Other gambling platforms should adopt the same attitude as Roobet.
I disagree with this. Who will be loyal to a casino that refuses to pay the funds at the name of KYC if it is not stated in their terms and conditions?
I don't agree with your second argument either, that other platforms should follow Roobet's practices, since I cannot think of any benefits KYC could provide to the customers. Even funnier is that you promote a popular casino with NO-KYC policy in your signature.
They didn't implement the KYC option at first so provably there's something happen in part of regulation and roobet want to comply on the law that's why now they are asking KYC to their costumers to have proper distiguishing if they are in legal age or not. But as for now the only benefit we can get for that is enjoying the perks what roobet can offer to their verified costumer so if other gambler don't like this option maybe they should go to a casino whicj doesn't require this KYC thing here.
There are so many cases where users struggle with KYC procedures after they invest on the platform. It has been my observation that many popular gambling websites end up denying to pay back the funds in the name of KYC and point out all sorts of ridiculous reasons. Roobet, in that respect, redefines what it means to be royal. Other gambling platforms should adopt the same attitude as Roobet.
I disagree with this. Who will be loyal to a casino that refuses to pay the funds at the name of KYC if it is not stated in their terms and conditions?
I don't agree with your second argument either, that other platforms should follow Roobet's practices, since I cannot think of any benefits KYC could provide to the customers. Even funnier is that you promote a popular casino with NO-KYC policy in your signature.
We do hate kyc as much as we can and if there are platforms turns out to be on that line then it is starting for our own views to change up and would find for another places which doesn't
really requiring verification.
We do hate on being tracked or get known and I couldn't blame off if people do have that kind of impression.
There might be an argument that if one has to do KYC why crypto casinos? Well, because crypto casinos have evolved a lot and it's not just the old dice game we can play at crypto casinos now. All big slots providers are offering games to crypto casinos and things are getting more centralized and legalized.
I honestly don't see it as KYC even having any benefit to the end user. However, I understand that crypto casinos are now slowly having to start requiring KYC from their customers. In many countries the regulations for crypto companies are tightened very much, next year probably also in the EU. Especially when a company comes into contact with FIAT, very strict requirements await. 
There are so many cases where users struggle with KYC procedures after they invest on the platform. It has been my observation that many popular gambling websites end up denying to pay back the funds in the name of KYC and point out all sorts of ridiculous reasons. Roobet, in that respect, redefines what it means to be royal. Other gambling platforms should adopt the same attitude as Roobet.
I disagree with this. Who will be loyal to a casino that refuses to pay the funds at the name of KYC if it is not stated in their terms and conditions?
I don't agree with your second argument either, that other platforms should follow Roobet's practices, since I cannot think of any benefits KYC could provide to the customers. Even funnier is that you promote a popular casino with NO-KYC policy in your signature.
As much as I support Roobet's decision of requesting KYC in advance of deposits, if this is their policy, I do not believe that other casinos should adopt the same approach.
Totally agree, just because someone does it doesn't mean that you have to do the same, and I don't think there's any laws that's going to cover that idea that they have to do a KYC that Roobet does. which most of majority of gamblers or people on this market is really preferred too.
They do know on whats been liked or not but once regulation or government do sets in and make out some implimentations or rules or regulations of such platform
then they wouldnt have any choice but to follow and would really make out some changes.
I see these factors;
-seasonal change
-crypto hodling decisions
-sudden KYC change
-People had looked another better place to play
Hard to tell but business does really have these kind of days where they dont really get much off traffic or huge amount of bets.
So it isnt that surprising.
You can add another factor to the list.-seasonal change
-crypto hodling decisions
-sudden KYC change
-People had looked another better place to play
Hard to tell but business does really have these kind of days where they dont really get much off traffic or huge amount of bets.
So it isnt that surprising.
- competitors doing better
I love roobet but there are so many casinos now days offering so many races and promotions that players are quite split among all the casinos and obviously everyone gets an email from all the casinos and the player opts to play under the most favorable conditions.
Identity verification has also contributed a lot but I don't think "crypto holding decisions" have anything to do with the decrease in wagers. Not sure why every gambling site is focussing so much on verification. Is that something with the license providers or what?
As much as I support Roobet's decision of requesting KYC in advance of deposits, if this is their policy, I do not believe that other casinos should adopt the same approach.
Totally agree, just because someone does it doesn't mean that you have to do the same, and I don't think there's any laws that's going to cover that idea that they have to do a KYC that Roobet does. There might be an argument that if one has to do KYC why crypto casinos? Well, because crypto casinos have evolved a lot and it's not just the old dice game we can play at crypto casinos now. All big slots providers are offering games to crypto casinos and things are getting more centralized and legalized.
I honestly don't see it as KYC even having any benefit to the end user. However, I understand that crypto casinos are now slowly having to start requiring KYC from their customers. In many countries the regulations for crypto companies are tightened very much, next year probably also in the EU. Especially when a company comes into contact with FIAT, very strict requirements await. 
But to be honest its clear if we talk about high amounts that extra verify is needed.
so everything fine
The casinos need to take some extra security measures at time of high withdrawal amounts and at level 3 only whales player are there and small gamblers need to comply with only lvl 1 in which they don't have to undergo any major KYC norms and is Ok with that.So you must read all the FAQ of the casino before playing over there.so everything fine
There might be an argument that if one has to do KYC why crypto casinos? Well, because crypto casinos have evolved a lot and it's not just the old dice game we can play at crypto casinos now. All big slots providers are offering games to crypto casinos and things are getting more centralized and legalized.
It has been my observation that many popular gambling websites end up denying to pay back the funds in the name of KYC and point out all sorts of ridiculous reasons. Roobet, in that respect, redefines what it means to be royal. Other gambling platforms should adopt the same attitude as Roobet.
There are many respectable casinos that only require KYC when withdrawing large amounts of money in accordance with AML laws in many jurisdictions. There are also casinos that do not require KYC at all, such as the casino from your signature. As for popular casinos refusing payouts based on KYC verification, that's a feature of scam casinos, and I wouldn't call them popular, at least on this forum.
As much as I support Roobet's decision of requesting KYC in advance of deposits, if this is their policy, I do not believe that other casinos should adopt the same approach.
@onecall123 how can a casino be popular and withhold one’s money under the pretext of KYC?, and if they’re here then there would be many scam accusations against them and one should avoid them. Also each casino takes a different approach to KYC, and if you’re not sure about it always ask or read their terms, but don’t assume all will have same approach like Roobet for KYC rules.
It has been my observation that many popular gambling websites end up denying to pay back the funds in the name of KYC and point out all sorts of ridiculous reasons. Roobet, in that respect, redefines what it means to be royal. Other gambling platforms should adopt the same attitude as Roobet.
There are many respectable casinos that only require KYC when withdrawing large amounts of money in accordance with AML laws in many jurisdictions. There are also casinos that do not require KYC at all, such as the casino from your signature. As for popular casinos refusing payouts based on KYC verification, that's a feature of scam casinos, and I wouldn't call them popular, at least on this forum.
As much as I support Roobet's decision of requesting KYC in advance of deposits, if this is their policy, I do not believe that other casinos should adopt the same approach.
when i tried to log in after months i was not able to and when i tried to recover my account it said that the username does not exist.
It is most likely that you have entered an incorrect format of your username. The chances of typing it incorrectly is much higher especially if your username has a combination of lowercase and uppercase letters. Or, you can just enter the email you have used when you created your roobet account for logging in as an alternative.Be careful though, Roobet is strictly prohibits multiple accounts in 1 IP.
Quote from: https://roobet.com/
You warrant not to create any additional accounts from the same electronic device, household, IP address, natural person, or legal identity without informing the Roobet support team immediately.
--
At least roober is asking KYC from the start and not like other sites that will let you Deposit and play and even withdraw when the amount is just lower but when you need to withdraw in a Higher funds ?
sure that you will face KYC verification in highest level in which mostly end up scamming you because they will pretend that the documents you provide is not real or not enough.
we have seen many cases like this and with roobet, they are preventing this from happening .
I agree with you. There are so many cases where users struggle with KYC procedures after they invest on the platform. It has been my observation that many popular gambling websites end up denying to pay back the funds in the name of KYC and point out all sorts of ridiculous reasons. Roobet, in that respect, redefines what it means to be royal. Other gambling platforms should adopt the same attitude as Roobet. At least roober is asking KYC from the start and not like other sites that will let you Deposit and play and even withdraw when the amount is just lower but when you need to withdraw in a Higher funds ?
sure that you will face KYC verification in highest level in which mostly end up scamming you because they will pretend that the documents you provide is not real or not enough.
we have seen many cases like this and with roobet, they are preventing this from happening .
Jump to: