I will not say that Roobet deceives anyone, because I don't know if it will happen or not. But I will talk about what you are wrong here. A casino pays more than $ 1500 per week doesn't mean they don't cheat. In some cases, a casino may take advantage of a signature campaign to scam users. I take the example with Kawbet, they have a signature campaign here, but they still cheat users, they can pay $ 1,000 per week, but they can cheat $ 3,000 per week, why not? Scams with small numbers are even more dangerous, because they can scam more users.
That is a different amount you are talking about. If there was constant cheating going on and there was some way of doing it consistently of course you would cheat and there would be doubts over it. However what people concern here is paying 1.5k per week for months and months and then stealing ... 100 bucks? That doesn't make sense at all. You need to have a constant complaints about scamming customers in order to say that they are scammers, if it is just one time deal that makes me right.The difference between your example and roobet is that your example is kawbet who probably cheated people constantly and continues to cheat as long as they can, that way they get new people and still make a profit. Whereas roobet doesn't have the same type of complaints about their website scamming people as kawbet which means just once or twice doesn't make sense when you are paying so much.
Wait and see how you will handle it!
What we need to care about is the evidence he can provide, I asked him to present the latest evidence, but he disappeared simply 
