Topic: Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘 - page 76. (Read 84471 times)

So true. I am not sure where the conversation started and who has got issues with the Roobet but this one is for them:
Reference

I am pretty sure that they can choose the remaining 1999 centralized casinos and 899 Dapps to have a game-changing experience for themselves. I am so connected with the Roobet and various other gambling sites that I am confused about which one to open today and try my luck there. Lolz. Never complained about the KYC and have already done it whatsoever.

It's not like we are doing it first time somewhere. I kinda started feeling east is far more digitalized and willing to accept the modern civil practices of showcasing identity than rest. Anyways, that is a different story, but Roobet and trust, you gotta have it or miss it.

Nothing remains permanently and policies can be changed. If a casino makes policy changes and announces it publicly, keeps it in their Change-Log, I don't see any big problem for customers. It's transparently and fairly enough.

Policy changes are made, you are free to comply with it and stay with us or just leave to another place. We are thankful for all your time being with us so far and we wish you the best in future. Honestly, Roobet is a big casino and they pay fairly to all users who don't abuse their system. Sweet experience for non abusive users on Roobet is what I believe.

Problems with people are similar. They reject to comply with policy changes in a big casino, trusted one and try to find new casinos that have unknown reputation. They only want to have experience with no KYC and sometimes they will land on a scam casino. No KYC is required by scam and steal your money.

If they have money after being scammed on other scam casinos I believe they will return to trusted ones like Roobet. 

We've seen some decentralized but ending up on failure or dead just because demand wasnt enough despite that this market does really like on having that full anonymity and this is why people or gamblers would

really most likely be leaning into these centralized platforms but asking out KYC but not really that mandatory.For those people who do accept out this common set up and doesnt really mind off much about their
identity then this wont really be that an issue. I dont know on why this discussion about KYC is a never ending one considering that this had been already in the talks for too long and this is really focusing
that much on Level 1 KYC of roobet which it do only ask out those basic information which is something not that much of a concern since you could put up some false information if
you dont like to tell the truth but we know that this isnt something recommendable considering that we do know on what would be the potential risks into it.

I am not sure if it is still "normal" to feel fear when sending that. I understand that some people might, but if you have been in the crypto world long enough then you have shared your information already to multiple places. There are 5 to 6 places that already have my KYC and I am not worried about it at all.

Plus, this place doesn't want as much information as people think, it is very minimal situation and that means you would have to provide proof and all that later on if anything happens of course but at the start it is not really that much. I know that we are moving towards a bit more decentralized market and that is why people would like to avoid this, we even started to have decentralized casinos for a while, didn't work well, but those people could start going towards that way.

We are not forced to play on particular casino so we are free to gamble anywhere as per our wish.If we are not comfortable and want complete privacy we can choose that casino but with time many casinos are opting for KYC norms to comply with the AML policies which is becoming trouble for those people.But we can't do much about it at last.

oh, definitely, it's a long long way for mastery of any craft
failure is just a temporary and necessary step in the way to greatness

Derek Sivers has some good essays on building in public

for those into art I totally recommend the book "your music and people"
https://sive.rs/no-oracle

exactly , better to not play in a casino that you don't feel comfortable .

if you wanted to be private then play in casino that has no KYC requirement .

There are players come to a casino because at first KYC is not implemented but when this casino became big then KYC has been implemented so we don't need to get surprised on anyone's action that they dislike this implementation. We need to understand that KYC in online casino became a normal thing so if we cannot afford to submit those requirements its really better for us to leave rather than get stress on unimportant situations.

I agree. If you don't like the rules and what the casino is asking to their players to be able to play, then don't gamble because no one is forcing you to comply if you really don't want to. We always have a choice and there are plenty of options out there so it's not an issue.

The gamblers who remain playing despite of the sudden changes are indeed loyal and aware that Roobet is reputable and one of the trusted casino currently.

I don't want to exaggerate things here but I agree on that because Roobet isa  trend setter because they boost not only the Games And Rounds section but even the Bitcoin service section is being flooded by their back to back events towards artist and of course gamblers .
though there are also many sites we can see in Games and rounds that brings games here and there , but the trend roobet brings is truly amazing and something the whole forum must be thankful and yes up to date they are having one.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/roobetcom-art-contest-mr-roo-rocks-the-cosmos-5000-ends-may-31st-5450850

and here is the latest one , everyone is free to join and chance to win huge amount for a contest .

I cannot deny it, it is so, this casino always does Different things, very different from what other casinos offer in their promotions, I think that most of us know what each casino is Capable of doing,According to dates, According to important events, casinos don't take out a special promotion, but at Roobet I have seen things that go Further, the style of their contests, sometimes they are not even aimed at players, but at another class of public and that makes that kind of If the non-playing public is Interested in Playing at the casino,it's great ideas that the Casino manages.

then the answer and solution is simple  "Dont Play In Roobet" that's it mate ,
it is not about Roobet doesn't care about the potential players but what can we do? if the team and the site only need to comply what the government is asking them for the players and team safety?
i think there is no need to further the discussion about this because it is given , comply with KYC verification or never play in site that has this rules.
people sometimes take it hard when the truth is? there is no real issue about that .

OK, to mention one of the decentralized casinos, Just-bet is atleast, one of the latest decentralized casino listed on this forum, though I've not tried gambling there, and don't know if I ever would find a good reason to, simply because passing kyc verification is not really my problem, and I am not a user of several casinos at a time, so by this, you should understand why kyc is not a problem to me..

One thing we all must understand is that, nobody eats his or her cake and still have it...
If one Is a gambler who frowns at kyc, then such gambler have the option to start using only decentralized casinos, but if the gambler does not like decentralized casino due to their current unpopular state, then be ready to pass kyc verification on a centralized casino the moment you win a good amount of money and place a withdrawal request.

And those are decentralized platforms but would you mind on mentioning one of those things? considering that they arent really that much popular nowadays which this market had been flooded out by centralized platforms which is really that evident. Passing up KYC is something that highly frowned upon on this space which we know that it is really going opposite to the main idea on what crypto is all about but since we know
that these platforms are something that could be applied with some regulations since it is really involving tons of money then its expected that government couldnt really just let it pass or slip.
This is why they would really be asked out if ever there are some huge whales would be playing or even winning up jackpots but the outmost preferred is pulling out those funds without
questions asked or no strings attached but well on having these platforms today then it would really becoming that a standard thing.

Even crypto casinos ask for kyc verification at some point, most especially when one wins and a good amount of money and wants to withdraw, for example, ive been gambling with crypto on stake for as long as I can remember, and I've also passed a kyc verification on the site..

The beautiful thing here is that, there are quite a good number of decentralized gambling casinos this days, and some of them look quite promising, and joining such casinos doesn't require registration not to talk of kyc, all one have to do is connect his or her wallet and start playing directly with the fund In the user's wallet.

Almost every recognised casino have mandatory KYC not sure for the deposit but for the withdrawal cause gambling regulatory bodies made it into the way. And nowadays I am hesitate to pick any non KYC centralized platforms because they are at the verge of getting seized, recently a newly launched crypto exchange also got seized or they just exit scammed their users which is still unknown but that shows the importance of choosing the regulated platforms to ensure the minimal risk of losing our money.

As far now decentralized casinos are not really used by anyone or I doubt is there a platform exist for gambling purpose though and its been years now the mandatory KYC rolled out in the cryptocurrency service providing platforms so its unavoidable at the moment.

I agree, the topic of online identity has been extensively debated. Generally, people feel uneasy and reluctant to reveal their true identities on the internet. Many firmly believe that using their real identity online can be extremely risky. As a result, they resort to using various pseudonyms to safeguard their anonymity. Additionally, some individuals prefer to keep their gambling activities private, not wanting anyone to be aware of their involvement, including their spouses or partners. Consequently, a significant number of people opt for anonymous payment methods such as Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies when engaging in online gambling.

Personally, being someone who also values privacy, one of the main reasons I decided to play at crypto casinos was due to the anonymity they provide. I strongly dislike the idea of my personal information being accessible on every website I visit. All it takes is one unscrupulous employee to expose this information on the dark web, and we have witnessed cases like this in the past.

Fortunately, Roobet has implemented a multi-tiered KYC (Know Your Customer) system, and I have only completed Level 1, which involves providing basic personal information (although it still makes me uneasy to provide my full name and address, but I suppose we have to come to terms with it).

This KYC topic has always been a debatable one as some are comfortable with it but others don't like to submit any documents to protect their privacy and remain anonymous which is why they have selected crypto casinos.But the thing is simple if you are not comfortable with it find other options as there are available otherwise you will have to comply with the regulations of casinos if you want to withdraw funds.

I agree that every casino has their own problems and it happens and that's normal, there is absolutely no reason to just bother it with constant attacks based on what you think is negative with it. I understand that some people dislike that, the simple solution is leaving and going to a place that doesn't have it, that way you could get away with it and not have any issues at all.

I personally believe that would be the best thing to do and I believe that we can move further along with it anytime we want. I get that we should be considering that as a big deal and I believe that we need to focus on having some sort of situation where understanding how it would work is a lot better. Just leave if you dislike, tell them why, and move on.

Anyone has the right to leave the casino if they really object to the KYC requirements which they may not like because they want to hide their identity to become an anonymous gambler, but after all playing in a decentralized casino is also not safe even without KYC, it all comes back to the wishes of which gambler they choose and make convenient, if I'd probably prefer to play at a big casino so even if they asked for KYC it was no problem for me.

KYC has always been a subject of debate that will never end in casinos, many complain about it and many consider it something normal, but playing anonymously is also not always safe, it all comes back to the gambler's choice