-snip-
Well, we all know that AI is very fashionable now, and many believe that everything is done on the basis of AI, and that is not the case, there are still many errors in the AI, even more in the detectors, so it should not even be seen as a tool, That's like looking for information on Wikipedia, because it's something unreliable, not viable and even less to draw conclusions, for now things aren't that effective, I have no idea how the AI will be in 1 or 2 years maybe it is more perfected, and perhaps it has more validity, but now what we have seen is not good to be trusted,there are many errors, and they must be corrected.
For now Al can only be used more to help in a question and answer session on services. I believe Al has the ability but it is still limited and most sites that are not only in gambling have used Al to make their job easier but not everything can be done by Al .
Moreover, the use of Al is not really liked by some people because it only slows down any problems that occur when applying for a kelurahan.
To rely on Al as an information search tool, I'm not sure that the information that can be completely failed because as you have arrived, there are still many errors and it is not very effective to find all available sources.
Maybe in the future Al can be developed but I don't know whether it will work or not.
I think that most likely AI will be developed to the level of a very smart person. However, for this, programmers and many other specialists will have to work a lot.
Now there are really many sources of information, as you noted, for example, Wikipedia, which contain unreliable or completely imaginary, sometimes even false information. Obviously, on the basis of such information, false conclusions and even erroneous actions can be made. For example, bets are made in a casino. But it seems to me that experts working on AI come up with more and more sophisticated ways and algorithms for determining and eliminating and ignoring false information. And this work must be successful.
Therefore, I am an optimist in this matter. But there is one thing! Will it be safe and good for all mankind?
This is exactly what is not clear.
As far as the ability of AI to evaluate the results of art competitions, I think that as of now, AI can only compare the submitted work with recognized masterpieces and other works of great artists. And without the emotional component. Therefore, the participation of AI in determining, for example, the results of the competition, I think, will still be incorrect and formal. All the same, judges can easily do without tips or opinions from AI.