^^^^
Well, it should not be overlooked that some AI developers may be training their AI with games from the best players in the world, whether in popker, black jack, dice, roulette, and the AI learns a lot and knows how to play, Obviously, he will learn many more strategies than us as humans, maybe that advantage is given, for now I think that this has not yet been developed, but we must know that the bears are going to go down that path, personally I think that the AI is sunao of the paths for the players to take advantage of them and this has a great scope that has not been taken yet, but I think that the direction is going towards there.
There is one significant feature of the formation of conclusions and recommendations from AI. First of all, it is partly the human factor and the worldview and philosophical attitudes of those people who are directly involved in training and setting up AI. A lot depends on this. But not only.
If AI draws information from the Internet, which is obvious and should be, then who sets up its filters to counteract false and distorted information? In a number of questions, for example in mathematics, the answers are always absolutely accurate and verifiable.
And in the field of, for example, artistic creativity, completely different approaches and the true decision about the talent of an artist is too vague and subjective. Unfortunately, now AI is widely used in aggressive and military developments.
And sucn an approach to solving problems is contrary to the humanistic mission of mankind. So far, I do not see any symptoms for the situation to begin to change for the better. Based on such attitudes, respectively, and the manner of gambling, AI should be expected to be exceptionally aggressive and offensive, unless of course the general attitudes of AI developers remain for a long time.
And it seems that they will be preserved because of the distraught and crazy politicians-idiots, old age and simply staying, one might say, in insanity.