Pages:
Author

Topic: Rumours that russia will use nuclear but where ? - page 2. (Read 266 times)

sr. member
Activity: 1708
Merit: 295
https://bitlist.co
Wich location russia attacks first ?
They say that it's not full nuclear war russia will hit just one small place.

People try to act like no nuclear but we are going to see small nuclear attacks

I'm just wondering if the OP can distinguish between AI-generated videos of Putin deploying nuclear weapons?

I've seen many things spread without credibility, so I don't have to sit around imagining another delusion. First of all, I believe that countries with nuclear weapons are aware of the consequences of using them, and retaliation through aid or some other excuse increases tensions between the parties. And I also agree with the view that there are no small nuclear attacks, because nuclear weapons are not small in nature.
sr. member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 262
20BET - Premium Casino & Sportsbook
Wich location russia attacks first ?
They say that it's not full nuclear war russia will hit just one small place.

People try to act like no nuclear but we are going to see small nuclear attacks
I think the NATO need to think very smart so that they don't get hit by Russia.
Russia is a big country with enough nuclear weapon to attack any of their adversaries.
I don't want this war to become a world war so that we more people are not going to make their lives through to mistake of attacking the Russians. I think every country in the West are taking their time to evaluate the consequences of the war because it could have a strong effect on the West majorly.
legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 2003
A Bitcoiner chooses. A slave obeys.
Wich location russia attacks first ?
They say that it's not full nuclear war russia will hit just one small place.

People try to act like no nuclear but we are going to see small nuclear attacks

Russia has been threatening nuclear since the beginning of the war. No country is stupid enough to actually do it.

They are empty threats, although it is extremely irresponsible to use such threats in the first place.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1359
People try to act like no nuclear but we are going to see small nuclear attacks

What are you basing that on?  I try not to buy into gossip about stuff like this and  just gets me worked up for no good reason.  And freaking people out rarely moves the needle in a good direction.
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
Unlike other warmongering nations, Russia's constitution forbids it from attacking with nuclear weapons, it can only be used for defense. As the desperation of NATO members increases with their failure in Ukraine conflict, many experts predict they can attack Russia to deviate the population from the social disintegration they are going through. But I'm hopeful that every nation comes to senses and don't promote war just for their ego. The good thing about most NATO countries is they are democratic and most people there are still wise enough to see where their country is heading and are expected to stop the attack on Russia through votes.
hero member
Activity: 1652
Merit: 569
Catalog Websites
This is bullshit as they will not use nuke else we all will be doomed if nuclear war starts, countries who have the nuclear weapon cannot use it now because there are more than one nation which possesses it and if there is any retaliation from another nuclear armed nation that's all. Why would they use it when they are fighting with much weaker opponents who are surviving due to outside support?
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1632
Do not die for Putin
Another fear mongering post from a Jr. You are late by many months - Putin has been sabre rattling about nukes for the last couple of years, so "rumours about this and that" are just that. Nuclear escalation would only work against Putin, as there is certainty to have an answer.

Just do not open thread after thread on this topic, everyone know what you are and what you are trying to do. Fearmongering is gone because Ruzzia will be subject to a massive non-nuclear retaliation even for "a small nuke" particularly if radiation reaches a NATO country.
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1474
🔃EN>>AR Translator🔃
I believe that this news (questions) cannot be dealt with due to two considerations:
- Firstly, because they are (according to the Op’s description) rumours. That is, it is not possible to verify the credibility of its source, reasons for its appearance, or timing.
- Secondly, because there is no concept of “small nuclear attacks” in the nuclear history of countries. If you consider that the Hiroshima or Nagasaki incidents can be considered small nuclear attacks, then let me tell you that those small attacks changed global balances forever and changed with them the maps of countries and everything related to international communication. Today, the least powerful nuclear bomb has a destructive power equivalent to many times the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined.

Currently, Russia is not in a position that requires it to use nuclear force in any way, especially since Ukraine (which it is fighting) is not a nuclear state, and all of Ukraine’s allies do not intend to recklessly threaten to support Ukraine with nuclear weapons.
The world has been committed to limiting the spread of nuclear weapons since 1968 (with the exception of India, Pakistan, Israel, and North Korea), and it seems that no one intends to violate this agreement because everyone is aware that destruction will include everyone.

Leave these rumours. It is nothing more than fake news to attract traffic to one of the sites or channels.
member
Activity: 479
Merit: 11
Wich location russia attacks first ?
They say that it's not full nuclear war russia will hit just one small place.

People try to act like no nuclear but we are going to see small nuclear attacks
Pages:
Jump to: