This is different from Al-Nassr which is dependent on Cristiano Ronaldo. Where when Cristiano Ronaldo is absent we always see Al-Nassr experiencing a decline.
I think Neymar’s impact at Al-Hilal and Ronaldo’s role at Al-Nassr holds some validity when viewed in the broader context of team dynamics in football. Neymar, despite his talent and global stature, hasn’t had the continuous playing time at Al-Hilal due to injuries, and while his presence could elevate the squad, Al-Hilal has indeed built a well-rounded team with enough star power to remain competitive. Players like Malcom, Rúben Neves, and others have proven themselves capable of delivering results, even in Neymar’s absence, and I think that was waste of money in the first stage.
Similarly, while Ronaldo’s influence at Al-Nassr has been transformative, especially in terms of leadership and bringing the team to another level, the squad has also strengthened with other key signings. The team's success isn’t entirely dependent on Ronaldo, as they have added depth in various positions, making them a formidable side even without him.
Both teams have demonstrated that, though their star players can make a huge difference, they aren't solely reliant on them, which is a testament to their squad building strategies. It is interesting to see the competition between these team.