It feels like all discussions here turn to god or racism,kind of sad that so many threads get hijacked in that matter.
Would really like this to be addressed,are they pushing this back till after the election maybe?
Bet Obama does not want to talk about it and rather dance with storm troopers instead till end of term.
Hilary will for sure brush it under the rug,Trump I think would do the same but a little less sure of it.
Topic: Saudia Arabia helped 9/11 hijackers (Read 1861 times)
Hitlers work?
How do we go from the hijack connection to Hitler!
The connection between these hijackers and the Saudis needs to be put out in the open. Which tells me it will be shut down and hidden under a stack somewhere just like any info that they got out of the Panama raid.
How do we go from the hijack connection to Hitler!
The connection between these hijackers and the Saudis needs to be put out in the open. Which tells me it will be shut down and hidden under a stack somewhere just like any info that they got out of the Panama raid.
It's called "Turn it to the subject of the Evil Jews" and it occurs whenever someone starts talking about those "Evil Muslims." In other words, the Muslims would rather you be talking about Evil Jews than Evil Muslims. But you know what? The lawsuit and the question of law is about Muslims in Saudi Arabia being Evil Muslims behind 9/11.
Unless.....there are some Saudi Princes who are secretly Jews?
Hmm....
Hitlers work?
How do we go from the hijack connection to Hitler!
The connection between these hijackers and the Saudis needs to be put out in the open. Which tells me it will be shut down and hidden under a stack somewhere just like any info that they got out of the Panama raid.
How do we go from the hijack connection to Hitler!
The connection between these hijackers and the Saudis needs to be put out in the open. Which tells me it will be shut down and hidden under a stack somewhere just like any info that they got out of the Panama raid.
You really sound like a good muslim.
How's life in your world of hate?
I'm not Muslim at all. I'm an awaken Christian, fighting for the restauration of our Glorious race and the extermination of the Jewish World Government. My life is really good. I have objectives and someday, Hitler's work will be finished.
Well, that's very interesting.
There wasn't any plane, so no hijacker at all. This is a Jewish-made explosion, from the interior of the building.
Hey, the Evil Jews! I was wondering how long before that monster lie would crop up.Feed it to your muslim friends, please.
That's the pure truth. Every modern problem on Earth is close or far related to the Jews. They're mass-murderers, they deserve to die. Adolf did not had the time to finalise his great work since he had to escape, but soon a new hero will come and finish this task, definitly.
Interesting I read it as a slag and you read it as validation. Perception really is what makes the world go round.
Bet if you blamed the Jews for stuff you eventually would be able to blame them for everything wrong in your life and the world.
Imagine the relief of being able to blame all your worries and pain on one group. Man I wish I had that going for me,sadly I know most of the garbage going on in my life is self inflicted.
What is a pure truth? Interesting choice of words.
I have been studying this big lie for several days non-stop, and I came to that conclusion : this was organised by the americano-sionists. This isn't the sole group that I hate, but one of the ones which deserves the more hate. That to Lord, nothing particularely wrong went in my life yet, so I can't blame something inexistant to the Jews.
You really sound like a good muslim.
How's life in your world of hate?
I'm not Muslim at all. I'm an awaken Christian, fighting for the restauration of our Glorious race and the extermination of the Jewish World Government. My life is really good. I have objectives and someday, Hitler's work will be finished.
summary; Obama doesn't want the Saudi sued over the few thousand killed in 9/11 as it opens the USA to being sued buy the millions its recently and currently killing or displacing in protecting its own interest; makes sense.
No, it doesn't "open the USA up" or any such thing.
Sovereign nations under English common law have immunity from lawsuits. This carries over and down into states, and even counties and cities having similar immunities.
What is interesting is a question about the immunity of (hypothetical) a single Saudi Prince.
I think he's not able to piggyback on the immunity from lawsuits enjoyed by his nation.
Simplifying it a bit.
Say a Saudi prince goes to England, shoots a man in cold blood, then returns to Saudi Arabia.
Is he immune from prosecution in England?
I'm not an attorney but I think NO.
sorry but your waffle missed my entire point
it wasn't my point, i was paraphrasing obama's bs
(with a touch of sarcasm) but you're off on your rant so by all means.I heard and read a lot regarding this theory and still didn't find or see one concrete evidence for such claim.
Of course, this conspiracy theory sounds interesting and people like to talk about it but we can't judge whole country based on speculations only.
Yes, Bin Laden and some other attackers was from Saudi Arabia and probably some people from this country like terrorist and supporting them but still this is not enough to say that Saudi Arabia is behind this attack.
After all, what will be their motivation, their goal for something like this?
Of course, this conspiracy theory sounds interesting and people like to talk about it but we can't judge whole country based on speculations only.
Yes, Bin Laden and some other attackers was from Saudi Arabia and probably some people from this country like terrorist and supporting them but still this is not enough to say that Saudi Arabia is behind this attack.
After all, what will be their motivation, their goal for something like this?
i completely share same ideas with you.. we cant blame whole nation because of horrible acts of some of its citizen.. saudi arabia is a powerful country and dont need to such conspriacy theories to beat usa up..
summary; Obama doesn't want the Saudi sued over the few thousand killed in 9/11 as it opens the USA to being sued buy the millions its recently and currently killing or displacing in protecting its own interest; makes sense.
No, it doesn't "open the USA up" or any such thing.
Sovereign nations under English common law have immunity from lawsuits. This carries over and down into states, and even counties and cities having similar immunities.
What is interesting is a question about the immunity of (hypothetical) a single Saudi Prince.
I think he's not able to piggyback on the immunity from lawsuits enjoyed by his nation.
Simplifying it a bit.
Say a Saudi prince goes to England, shoots a man in cold blood, then returns to Saudi Arabia.
Is he immune from prosecution in England?
I'm not an attorney but I think NO.
sorry but your waffle missed my entire point
it wasn't my point, i was paraphrasing obama's bs
(with a touch of sarcasm) but you're off on your rant so by all means. There wasn't any plane, so no hijacker at all. This is a Jewish-made explosion, from the interior of the building.
Hey, the Evil Jews! I was wondering how long before that monster lie would crop up.Feed it to your muslim friends, please.
That's the pure truth. Every modern problem on Earth is close or far related to the Jews. They're mass-murderers, they deserve to die. Adolf did not had the time to finalise his great work since he had to escape, but soon a new hero will come and finish this task, definitly.
Interesting I read it as a slag and you read it as validation. Perception really is what makes the world go round.
Bet if you blamed the Jews for stuff you eventually would be able to blame them for everything wrong in your life and the world.
Imagine the relief of being able to blame all your worries and pain on one group. Man I wish I had that going for me,sadly I know most of the garbage going on in my life is self inflicted.
What is a pure truth? Interesting choice of words.
I have been studying this big lie for several days non-stop, and I came to that conclusion : this was organised by the americano-sionists. This isn't the sole group that I hate, but one of the ones which deserves the more hate. That to Lord, nothing particularely wrong went in my life yet, so I can't blame something inexistant to the Jews.
You really sound like a good muslim.
How's life in your world of hate?
i do no know that why everyone is targeting the saudia arabia for 9/11 attacks and thay say that saudia helped hijackers in those attacks but there governament has already explained that they have nothing to do with those attacks.
Lol... you are funny. What next? Consider these: you can argue that all hook-nosed people are evil, because Hitler claimed so. You can put forth the argument that Kim Jong Un is the best head of state in the world, because that is what the DPRK authorities claim. Or you can say that Gambia is the land of milk and honey, since the Gambian president had claimed so.
In America, Canada, Britain, and Australia, and a few other countries that have juries, any person can bring any claim before the court in jury trial. The jury has the right and duty to judge according to its conscience. The jury could require damages from another country, and require the nation to go to war to retrieve those damages. If the nation didn't appeal it and get it changed by another jury, it would be against the law to not go to war after the damages.
A jury can require a country to go to war.
It's a very interesting alternate universe you live in.
Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity
The traditional rule is that the government or sovereign cannot be sued without its consent. This doctrine prevented citizens from bringing actions against the government to redress wrongs allegedly committed against them by the government.
The government retains sovereign immunity in order to protect the Treasury and its discretionary governmental functions.
Waiver of sovereign immunity and consent to be sued can only be granted by an act of Congress. In giving its consent, Congress may impose such conditions and restrictions as it deems proper. Schillinger v. United States, 155 U.S. 163 (1894).
It is very interesting that you missed the part about "If the nation didn't appeal it ..."
Jury rules if there is no appeal, and maybe even after, if the appeal fails.
It's amazing how you would promote anti-freedom by suggesting that the jury doesn't have power.
EDIT: In addition, do you think that Saddam Hussein invited the U.S. into his country to take him to America to be tried and executed? "We" went in there and did what we did against all kinds of our own laws and international laws.
Relevant part bolded. Read the Schillinger case.
Jury nullification has been so hidden lately.
Remember in the past (50 to 80 years ago) when other nations were afraid to attack an American citizens? Jury nullification can overrule all codes and statutes, and even other court cases. But it can't be done if the jurors don't know about it.
There wasn't any plane, so no hijacker at all. This is a Jewish-made explosion, from the interior of the building.
Hey, the Evil Jews! I was wondering how long before that monster lie would crop up.Feed it to your muslim friends, please.
That's the pure truth. Every modern problem on Earth is close or far related to the Jews. They're mass-murderers, they deserve to die. Adolf did not had the time to finalise his great work since he had to escape, but soon a new hero will come and finish this task, definitly.
Interesting I read it as a slag and you read it as validation. Perception really is what makes the world go round.
Bet if you blamed the Jews for stuff you eventually would be able to blame them for everything wrong in your life and the world.
Imagine the relief of being able to blame all your worries and pain on one group. Man I wish I had that going for me,sadly I know most of the garbage going on in my life is self inflicted.
What is a pure truth? Interesting choice of words.
I have been studying this big lie for several days non-stop, and I came to that conclusion : this was organised by the americano-sionists. This isn't the sole group that I hate, but one of the ones which deserves the more hate. That to Lord, nothing particularely wrong went in my life yet, so I can't blame something inexistant to the Jews.
There wasn't any plane, so no hijacker at all. This is a Jewish-made explosion, from the interior of the building.
Hey, the Evil Jews! I was wondering how long before that monster lie would crop up.Feed it to your muslim friends, please.
That's the pure truth. Every modern problem on Earth is close or far related to the Jews. They're mass-murderers, they deserve to die. Adolf did not had the time to finalise his great work since he had to escape, but soon a new hero will come and finish this task, definitly.
Interesting I read it as a slag and you read it as validation. Perception really is what makes the world go round.
Bet if you blamed the Jews for stuff you eventually would be able to blame them for everything wrong in your life and the world.
Imagine the relief of being able to blame all your worries and pain on one group. Man I wish I had that going for me,sadly I know most of the garbage going on in my life is self inflicted.
What is a pure truth? Interesting choice of words.
There wasn't any plane, so no hijacker at all. This is a Jewish-made explosion, from the interior of the building.
Hey, the Evil Jews! I was wondering how long before that monster lie would crop up.Feed it to your muslim friends, please.
That's the pure truth. Every modern problem on Earth is close or far related to the Jews. They're mass-murderers, they deserve to die. Adolf did not had the time to finalise his great work since he had to escape, but soon a new hero will come and finish this task, definitly.
There wasn't any plane, so no hijacker at all. This is a Jewish-made explosion, from the interior of the building.
Hey, the Evil Jews! I was wondering how long before that monster lie would crop up.Feed it to your muslim friends, please.
There wasn't any plane, so no hijacker at all. This is a Jewish-made explosion, from the interior of the building.
In America, Canada, Britain, and Australia, and a few other countries that have juries, any person can bring any claim before the court in jury trial. The jury has the right and duty to judge according to its conscience. The jury could require damages from another country, and require the nation to go to war to retrieve those damages. If the nation didn't appeal it and get it changed by another jury, it would be against the law to not go to war after the damages.
A jury can require a country to go to war.It's a very interesting alternate universe you live in.
Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity
The traditional rule is that the government or sovereign cannot be sued without its consent. This doctrine prevented citizens from bringing actions against the government to redress wrongs allegedly committed against them by the government.
The government retains sovereign immunity in order to protect the Treasury and its discretionary governmental functions.
Waiver of sovereign immunity and consent to be sued can only be granted by an act of Congress. In giving its consent, Congress may impose such conditions and restrictions as it deems proper. Schillinger v. United States, 155 U.S. 163 (1894).
It is very interesting that you missed the part about "If the nation didn't appeal it ..."
Jury rules if there is no appeal, and maybe even after, if the appeal fails.
It's amazing how you would promote anti-freedom by suggesting that the jury doesn't have power.
EDIT: In addition, do you think that Saddam Hussein invited the U.S. into his country to take him to America to be tried and executed? "We" went in there and did what we did against all kinds of our own laws and international laws.
Relevant part bolded. Read the Schillinger case.
In America, Canada, Britain, and Australia, and a few other countries that have juries, any person can bring any claim before the court in jury trial. The jury has the right and duty to judge according to its conscience. The jury could require damages from another country, and require the nation to go to war to retrieve those damages. If the nation didn't appeal it and get it changed by another jury, it would be against the law to not go to war after the damages.
A jury can require a country to go to war.It's a very interesting alternate universe you live in.
Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity
The traditional rule is that the government or sovereign cannot be sued without its consent. This doctrine prevented citizens from bringing actions against the government to redress wrongs allegedly committed against them by the government.
The government retains sovereign immunity in order to protect the Treasury and its discretionary governmental functions.
Waiver of sovereign immunity and consent to be sued can only be granted by an act of Congress. In giving its consent, Congress may impose such conditions and restrictions as it deems proper. Schillinger v. United States, 155 U.S. 163 (1894).
It is very interesting that you missed the part about "If the nation didn't appeal it ..."
Jury rules if there is no appeal, and maybe even after, if the appeal fails.
It's amazing how you would promote anti-freedom by suggesting that the jury doesn't have power.
EDIT: In addition, do you think that Saddam Hussein invited the U.S. into his country to take him to America to be tried and executed? "We" went in there and did what we did against all kinds of our own laws and international laws.
i do not think that saudia arabia is helped the 9/11 hijackers. because saudia arabia has nothing to do with these terror attacks. and they have openly said many times that they did not help the hijackers. how can saudia will help the hijackers? the hijackers have no links with saudia arabia.
I heard and read a lot regarding this theory and still didn't find or see one concrete evidence for such claim.
Of course, this conspiracy theory sounds interesting and people like to talk about it but we can't judge whole country based on speculations only.
Yes, Bin Laden and some other attackers was from Saudi Arabia and probably some people from this country like terrorist and supporting them but still this is not enough to say that Saudi Arabia is behind this attack.
After all, what will be their motivation, their goal for something like this?
Of course, this conspiracy theory sounds interesting and people like to talk about it but we can't judge whole country based on speculations only.
Yes, Bin Laden and some other attackers was from Saudi Arabia and probably some people from this country like terrorist and supporting them but still this is not enough to say that Saudi Arabia is behind this attack.
After all, what will be their motivation, their goal for something like this?
I agree with U. That,s miens someone is background and he helped 9/11 hijackers. And he tried to incline Saudia Arabia.
Saudi Arabia is home to the Wahibbi brand of Islam, and subsects of Wahibbi are most of violent Islam. For example, Sayyad Qutb and his sect formed the Muslim Brotherhood. Bin Laden came from that basic group.
It's not unreasonable to think if some few princes in Saudi believed in these extreme ideas, they may have directly or indirectly helped in the 911 events.
I don't believe any evidence of this has ever been presented, though. It's also possible that a Saudi prince might give money to a group and not know of it's actual evil intentions.
Jump to: