piracy = making illegal copies of software (not illegal in all jurisdictions BTW)
Using educational versions of keys = a terms of service violation, not software piracy. A user may very well have a legally produced MS issued copy of the software disk.
It's not a grey area. Just because you didn't caught doesn't mean it's not a crime. The chance of being caught is admittedly very small, that is probably why you don't have an issue breaking the law so easily.
No, but it not being a crime means it is not a crime.
NOTE: Selling these keys is not a CRIMINAL act. At worst it may be considered a violation of terms of service which would be a CIVIL claim. The title of this op itself is misleading.
I used to mention before that I am not a lawyer. Software piracy is illegal in many jurisdictions. Selling these keys is against to EULA/TOS. I strongly disagree with your assessment of the worst case scenario. The worst case scenario is more like a buyer gets sued, found guilty and will have to pay a multi-million dollar fine. It has happened for people who downloaded a few songs. Are you telling me, definitively, that it will not happen to someone using unlicensed Windows, Word, Outlook, Powerpoint and Excel?
I can not definitively say that selling keys is also illegal, but I reckon enabling piracy will in many jurisdiction also be plain illegal. In addition all the sellers are misleading their "customers" with false claims. ("Legit", "lifetime warranty" and what not). See below for me having a life...
If you look at my history I've been posting replies in other sales threads as well. I am not singling out FuckIdolPlus. The other sellers, though, took my comments and left it at that. FuckIdolPlus blew a fuse and that caused some extra attention. Also, I am a single individual, I do have a life and I don't have time to chase down every shady business on here.
I choose to pick on those selling Starbucks gift cards (because they cause credit card fraud and do harm to individuals) and Microsoft product key sellers. My approach is fairly simple: I make it explicit that what they're doing is fraudulent. If, at any time, an authority goes after these dealer and/or their customers they will have a hard time claiming ignorance.
If no authority will ever take action then so be it.
Tell me please, what evidence do you have that what they are doing is fraudulent other than your own power of speculation? Why is it that harmed users can not leave negative ratings for themselves? What do you feel gives you the authority to preemptively harm the reputations of retailers you merely speculate MAY be engaged in illegal activity without actual evidence of this?
Sir you are just wasting your time engaging with this arsehole. I think you should just ignore him. He'll get tired pretty soon
Regards