No, what I'm saying is scotaloo has not scammed anyone, so why should scotaloo be banned? I never confessed to scamming I may have mentioned hacking before, but so has ArtForz, BitcoinEXpress (the 51% attacks) and many many other people. I have not defrauded anyone using this account and 'looking' like an alt of someone else does not warrant a ban especially when that alt isn't even banned.
I'm not going to scam anyone using this account, I already have negative trust nobody will trade with me, I shouldn't get a ban because I'm not ban evading which is what Maged thought I was doing, BASICasic isn't even banned, I only want to post here and not trade, and I haven't been 'spamming' like many others and mainly stick to my own threads.
I'm not going to scam anyone using this account, I already have negative trust nobody will trade with me, I shouldn't get a ban because I'm not ban evading which is what Maged thought I was doing, BASICasic isn't even banned, I only want to post here and not trade, and I haven't been 'spamming' like many others and mainly stick to my own threads.
You're right, there's no evidence against scotaloo so that account shouldn't be banned, however, you've also admitted to being a scammer.
I've also noticed you're very specific in the way you phrase things. It seems to me you don't like to lie. It's actually not something you want to do so in that sense you're honest.
What also seems clear to me (and this is merely speculation) that you'd be happy to return any scammed funds if there's evidence against you which means that you have scammed but you feel you're clever enough that you can't get caught.
Summary: An honest scammer with integrity but a scammer none the less?
IMO, it shows a conscious effort to word carefully as not to incriminate self. So, the desire to "lie" or "deceive" is there just not out in the open fully, yet. Just MHO.
