Topic: Scam accusations against SupremosKaiosama (alt of Humbertin) - page 2. (Read 1286 times)

Sure, give me a minute.

---

---

While we're twiddling our thumbs, let's look at something.


UTC−05:00  takes in Colombia (which has been established as being Humbertin's point of origin) and Ecuador.  (or are people going to say it's UTC+05:00 which takes in Pakistan  )

There is no time zone -5.5  -  Why would Webtricks have a time zone that doesn't exist?



See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:UTC_offsets

---

---

A couple of mouse clicks can change a browser's spell checker (especially for someone as LoyceV points out has bad grammar) and then when they use their Humbertin alt revert back to their native Spanish??

Even the parts that match are quite questionable:


Basically anyone with the latest version of Chrome on a smallish laptop would be Humbertin according to blackjack.fun and Timelord2067. Ludicrous.

I don't necessarily consider excluding someone from a Trust list retaliatory. In this case: you made a bad judgement call, so he doesn't Trust your judgement.
Have you looked at the red bold part in my quote above? That's what's used to "prove" they're alts!

Can you post a link? I'd like to read up.

Whist overlooking the retaliatory DT distrust?

---

---

Yeh, that's what humbertin does, goes on a retaliatory distrust feedback spree - this time it's retaliatory DT.  A gambling website is protecting it's own financial interest by exposing scammers, but I'm the one being attacked?  I still remember that time DavidXXXX had the DT1 Trolls eating out the palm of their hands convincing everyone that they weren't an alt of Humbertin, then went on to scam. (Had a look, can't find it) Nothing changes.

System is probably wrong. The evidence isn't very convincing:

I've "known" Humbertin for years, from my time as a chat Mod on Rollin. He's quite a character: he's sometimes funny, has terrible English, cries as hard for losing 1mBTC as for losing 18BTC, takes debts to gamble, rains 2BTC to get unbanned from chat when he's winning, and cheats to gamble whenever he's out of money.
I've seen webtricks on Bitcointalk, he's skilled, has good English, and is nothing like Humbertin. I've countered Timelord2067's non-DT feedback with a neutral comment from my non-DT Mobile account.

I wouldn't call neutral feedback retaliatory, I'd say it's proper feedback usage by not responding with negative feedback.

My Personal Full Trust Depth viewer for all users (which I haven't updated since May) explains the large recursive implications of a custom Trust list.

Who do you think you are? Some kind of almighty sitting here judging other forum members' fate?

Let me get the facts straight first: You turned on notification for 'Hello I am Humb' keyword and someone posted 'Webtricks=Hello I am Humb' (I really hate when someone writes webtricks with 'w' in uppercase). You thought you got the hit, exclaimed 'Eureka' in your mind and rushed forward to give me the red trust and reported me for ban evasion. What a "responsible member" of Bitcointalk community you are, I really envy you.

Now coming back to the topic, did you even read the Blackjack.fun thread before posting here the findings? I guess not because if you read, you knew that I am the one who's accusing Blackjack for irrational banning. In the defense, Blackjack.fun's admin provided evidence that I am using same browser and screen resolution as the other user! Yeah right! Alt accusation because I am using same browser and resolution, lol. Do you think as the "responsible member" of the community that this is enough for giving red trust? Didn't you think it would be wise to wait for my reply in the thread or wait for admin to provide more evidence? Nope, how could you! You had to do what "responsible member" of the community should do in such situation, isn't it?

I know it isn't considered wise to leave retaliatory feedback but I think you deserve at least neutral feedback for coming up with this shit and wasting my time. And since you aren't DT1/DT2 why the hell do I see your red trust as default, who in my trust list thinks you are worthy to trust with such feedbacks, is it Vod? @LoyceV, here's an idea for another tool: what about a tool which tells you who in your trust list trusts/distrusts a particular user, what you say?
Nevermind, congratulations for becoming the first entry in my distrust list. To use forum on positive note, I had decided to try to keep those two distrust columns empty but not everyday is Sunday and you have to deal with the situations like this.

PS: I hope you would understand the average sarcasm I used at places in the post. And you are welcome to give me another red trust for being sarcastic.

*edited* due to unfolding events.

Less than 24 hours ago I stumbled upon this thread and added


to my list of "bad words" in LoyceV's [Active] Finding spam and scams by keyword thread.

Within a day blackjack.fun had posted the following, but when they presented their evidence, it became less likely there was a connection due to inconsistancies in blackjack.fun's "evidence"

Note: Post truncated.


blackjack.fun is claiming to be able to provide more proof after the 17th of December.

He always kinda pull of these kind of things: abusing promotional activities, taking and defaulting on loans, scamming newbies with some fake keys or digital goods he doesn't have.

Good one @sujonali1819, gonna go ahead and add a feedback. Thanks for reporting.

1. http://archive.fo/wip/kGnSw
2. http://archive.fo/7e1IO

Another account of  SupremosKaiosama. The user first tried to cheat the blackjack.fun winning contest with the fake winning amount. And now he comes again with another bitcointalk account PIBWORLD (though the winning amount is correct this time)

Tagged and I created flag against this scammer, if anyone wants to support it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1967

---

@LoyceV, can you update topic with "Humb" thingy? Technicalities for flag....

I want to add something. Since I have run the blackjack.fun signature campaign and contest, Sometimes I visit the site for playing/other reasons. And sometimes I saw the user Hello I am Humb/SupremosKaiosama are trolling on the chatbox unnecessarily. that looks like very shady things.

So the proofs here and the chatbox trolling(that I have seen) helps me to believe easily this user is not trustworthy.

Hmm. Very likely with this post as well:


and here is a post from Timelord2067 talking about Humbertin being from somehwere in Colombia or Ecuador.

---

Anyway found out one connection linked with scammer here:


(Archive: http://archive.is/UkBkw)


(Archive: http://archive.vn/CJPWm)

Trust profile of TimesSquareNY: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2589532 (filled up with all likely alt of scammer : Humbertin feedbacks)



Yep, its Humbertin

Looks like good old scammer Humbertin19_ indeed:
But I'm not comfortable giving him a red tag for this, there's still a change it's someone else using a similar name.

I'm surprised there are still people who trust Newbies with funds!

This scam deserves a warning:

You don't need to dig in to this to figure out whose alt this is.

This post reference should say all:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54468108

I stumbled upon WTB - Netflix trial 1 month ( need many), where user SupremosKaiosama had deleted his posts.
OP claims he was scammed, and SupremosKaiosama has "untrusted" negative feedback from 4 different users. There's no direct evidence, but removing his posts after posting his Telegram username doesn't look good either.
I'll use this topic for a neutral Reference tag.

If anyone wants to dig deeper, see all unedited (or deleted) posts made by SupremosKaiosama.

Update:
A known scammer.