Due to that very same reason, their silence, is why I proposed to you the possibility that if no one complained on their platform or here, the bug is fixed, as there are chances other also find and could replicate the bug just as you did, tried the bug, and others complained about it. Of which your reply was that can roughly summed up as my proposal is invalid and only shows that I am clueless, and I ask [which yet to be explained up to this point] which part of it is invalid?
Feel free to evade it and give no explanation again, and blabber other things instead.
now you are admitting that you don't know if the bug/exploit is fixed but you cannot say it in a YES or NO
how funny (or not funny) is that?
This single sentence itself is eligible to make us question your logic and [borrowing your way-overused word] IQ. It is honestly frown inducing. Can't you see how that sentence contradict and answer itself? I don't know if the bug is fixed or not [I am currently inquiring about that very thing to Eva], and since I don't know about it, how on earth can I say it in a yes or no? You want me to say "yes"? If then it's not fixed, that'll be misleading. If I say "no" and it actually already fixed, I'll be making a false statement. Can't you see this very simple equation?
Do you really think that the person who knows and uses it will file a complaint or come here???
Hmm... I think it'll be safe to assume and imagine the rough form of that glitch based on your explanation here, or perhaps the ones in a quite detail, given on the opening post. Can't people guess what's the exploit looks like?
And the reason it's brought and mentioned here if you can't prove it, is...?
My guess is that you did not, because it is a simple YES or NO question, and if not, why do you even discuss this bug/exploit issue
On their platform, no. But playing BJ? Yeah, occasionally, for fun. I can't see how this is relevant to your explanation. If may elaborate, and perhaps begin explaining that way overdue explanation?