Another good point to show that Blackjack.fun is a Scammer
Please check this conversation as it shows how unprofessional the scammer Blackjack.fun is in offering his Blackjack.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63104687
I asked in their thread where can a player see the blackjack rules?
Blackjack.fun the scammer did not answer this very important question, but a nice member replied that even he did not understand why anyone would want to know the rules as Blackjack rules are known.
Unfortunately, he does not understand Blackjack well enough, but at least he kindly offered to forward my question to the owner of Scammer Blackjack.fun. I never heard back.
Show me a reputable Blackjack casino, online or land based, that does not let the players see their Blackjack rules.
There isn't one, because only scammers don't show the rules.
Topic: [ SCAM ALERT ] Blackjack.Fun is a cheap Scammer - page 2. (Read 2637 times)
@icopress the Blackjack.fun signature manager caught me red-handed! LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
read his posting in reputation thread
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63837598
If there was a Negative Merit to be awarded, I would give it to @icopress for this stupid! posting
he and some other poster think by attacking and insulting me they are doing Blackjack.fun owner a favor. In contrary they are hurting him and themselves.
It also does not let Blackjack.fun get away with the scam since it is still open.
read his posting in reputation thread
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63837598
If there was a Negative Merit to be awarded, I would give it to @icopress for this stupid! posting
he and some other poster think by attacking and insulting me they are doing Blackjack.fun owner a favor. In contrary they are hurting him and themselves.
It also does not let Blackjack.fun get away with the scam since it is still open.
Take a look at this post by a member who has well understood Blackjack.fun, avoiding to answer the important questions
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63774318
Quote from: blackjack.fun on March 07, 2024, 06:32:23 PM
No one took the funds away from you. So, what is the scam about?
Are you not going to answer? Where or How did he use these supposed exploits to his advantage? Where is the proof. How come this question is always avoided
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63774318
Quote from: blackjack.fun on March 07, 2024, 06:32:23 PM
No one took the funds away from you. So, what is the scam about?
Are you not going to answer? Where or How did he use these supposed exploits to his advantage? Where is the proof. How come this question is always avoided
Hey again and let's see if green text is more accepted
I gave a long answer in the Blackjack.fun thread to a very decent member @BitcoinGirl.Club who asked me to give a short recap of the events as he did not read all of it as it gets a lot and overwhelming.
I thought it would be appropriate to have it here in the Scam Accusation thread as well.
the link
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63814896
an excerpt of a short example I gave to understand what happened
Let me try to explain it to you with a simple and perhaps silly example.
7 people are sitting at a table in a coffee shop. 10 $100 bills are spread out on the table. I have very fast hands because I am a magician and I take 1 bill and no one pays attention.
In comparison, the blackjack player who used the exploit once to win the tournament would be stupid to do it again in the same game as it makes no sense even he could do it and he might get caught by other players.
back to the table in the coffee shop where I grabbed a $100 bill and no one saw it. but I did it again and again which means I grabbed 1 bill and another bill and another bill. so few or all 7 at the table saw what I did. what did they do? they called the police to file a complaint.
This is what happened when I used the exploit and intentionally exaggerated few players or only one complaint to the owner of Blackjack.fun. The Blackjack.fun owner did not know my username on the tables as he knew only Jackpotracer from his thread in the forum.
As some other member politely asked what I want, here is my simple answer ELI5
Anyway, I never asked for a payout and only after their unprofessional behavior towards me I asked to donate the money as I described in the last post. I don't see anything wrong with that as they could apologize and donate the 24-30USDT and all would be over.
Please understand that Blackjack.fun ridiculously accused me of exploiting the game to gain some of the 24USDT they owe me, instead of thanking me for finding the exploit. They did not even prove their accusation and they could easily prove it by checking the game logs. All this because of 24-30USDT I did not even ask to withdraw Hey come on start walking in our shoes
I gave a long answer in the Blackjack.fun thread to a very decent member @BitcoinGirl.Club who asked me to give a short recap of the events as he did not read all of it as it gets a lot and overwhelming.
I thought it would be appropriate to have it here in the Scam Accusation thread as well.
the link
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63814896
an excerpt of a short example I gave to understand what happened
Let me try to explain it to you with a simple and perhaps silly example.
7 people are sitting at a table in a coffee shop. 10 $100 bills are spread out on the table. I have very fast hands because I am a magician and I take 1 bill and no one pays attention.
In comparison, the blackjack player who used the exploit once to win the tournament would be stupid to do it again in the same game as it makes no sense even he could do it and he might get caught by other players.
back to the table in the coffee shop where I grabbed a $100 bill and no one saw it. but I did it again and again which means I grabbed 1 bill and another bill and another bill. so few or all 7 at the table saw what I did. what did they do? they called the police to file a complaint.
This is what happened when I used the exploit and intentionally exaggerated few players or only one complaint to the owner of Blackjack.fun. The Blackjack.fun owner did not know my username on the tables as he knew only Jackpotracer from his thread in the forum.
As some other member politely asked what I want, here is my simple answer ELI5
Anyway, I never asked for a payout and only after their unprofessional behavior towards me I asked to donate the money as I described in the last post. I don't see anything wrong with that as they could apologize and donate the 24-30USDT and all would be over.
Please understand that Blackjack.fun ridiculously accused me of exploiting the game to gain some of the 24USDT they owe me, instead of thanking me for finding the exploit. They did not even prove their accusation and they could easily prove it by checking the game logs. All this because of 24-30USDT I did not even ask to withdraw Hey come on start walking in our shoes
Hey all
Some members in another thread told me they don't like blue text, so I'm going to change it to green for now.
The discussions in the following threads are very interesting and reveal more and more the real face of Blackjack.fun owner and Eva, the so called representative of Blackjack.fun, as it could still be a one man show, as the owner is also the developer, so why not play Eva, the support lady? Especially Eva twists and turns like a snake, trying to avoid answering very clear questions.
Here the reputation thread
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/standing-strong-against-unjust-attacks-a-call-for-community-support-5485686
Blackjack.fun thread
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/blackjackfun-up-to-80-rakeback-slotssportsesports-jack-token-5106215
The Blackjack.fun Scam Is still a Scam as nothing changed beside a lot of Bla Bla and attacks against me instead to be thankful that I found the exploit and other bugs!
Some members in another thread told me they don't like blue text, so I'm going to change it to green for now.
The discussions in the following threads are very interesting and reveal more and more the real face of Blackjack.fun owner and Eva, the so called representative of Blackjack.fun, as it could still be a one man show, as the owner is also the developer, so why not play Eva, the support lady? Especially Eva twists and turns like a snake, trying to avoid answering very clear questions.
Here the reputation thread
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/standing-strong-against-unjust-attacks-a-call-for-community-support-5485686
Blackjack.fun thread
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/blackjackfun-up-to-80-rakeback-slotssportsesports-jack-token-5106215
The Blackjack.fun Scam Is still a Scam as nothing changed beside a lot of Bla Bla and attacks against me instead to be thankful that I found the exploit and other bugs!
Honey... did you bother to read my post on BJF's thread? I inquired them exactly that. If they are yet to answer to my question [that's also asked by several other members], how on earth can I give you an answer and 100% sure about it, if they're yet to answer it? Who do you think I am? NSA?
Due to that very same reason, their silence, is why I proposed to you the possibility that if no one complained on their platform or here, the bug is fixed, as there are chances other also find and could replicate the bug just as you did, tried the bug, and others complained about it. Of which your reply was that can roughly summed up as my proposal is invalid and only shows that I am clueless, and I ask [which yet to be explained up to this point] which part of it is invalid?
Feel free to evade it and give no explanation again, and blabber other things instead.
Due to that very same reason, their silence, is why I proposed to you the possibility that if no one complained on their platform or here, the bug is fixed, as there are chances other also find and could replicate the bug just as you did, tried the bug, and others complained about it. Of which your reply was that can roughly summed up as my proposal is invalid and only shows that I am clueless, and I ask [which yet to be explained up to this point] which part of it is invalid?
Feel free to evade it and give no explanation again, and blabber other things instead.
now you are admitting that you don't know if the bug/exploit is fixed but you cannot say it in a YES or NO
how funny (or not funny) is that?
This single sentence itself is eligible to make us question your logic and [borrowing your way-overused word] IQ. It is honestly frown inducing. Can't you see how that sentence contradict and answer itself? I don't know if the bug is fixed or not [I am currently inquiring about that very thing to Eva], and since I don't know about it, how on earth can I say it in a yes or no? You want me to say "yes"? If then it's not fixed, that'll be misleading. If I say "no" and it actually already fixed, I'll be making a false statement. Can't you see this very simple equation?
Let me also tell you not to twist and distort the content! you are not doing any good to the good and decent members here.
Why would you dare to discuss something you do not know and have not researched thoroughly?
Just spam your signature for a few sats.
By the way, the IQ word can never be overused in your case.
Why would someone complain if they don't know what the bug/exploit looks like?
Do you really think that the person who knows and uses it will file a complaint or come here???
Do you really think that the person who knows and uses it will file a complaint or come here???
Hmm... I think it'll be safe to assume and imagine the rough form of that glitch based on your explanation here, or perhaps the ones in a quite detail, given on the opening post. Can't people guess what's the exploit looks like?
No one can guess how the exploit looks like. only after you have played against the one who knows it and uses it against you, only then can you understand the exploit. but again, only if you are an expert of the blackjack game. the one who knows the exploit like me can explain it.
The owner who is also the developer can check the game logs and can see where the exploit was used and how the exploit works. but till today Blackjack.fun and Eva did not answer if they fixed it! I guess they did not fix it because they removed the free rolls.
The one who opened another scam accusation after me was very quickly satisfied and I am sure it was a nice sum (all in relation to the country he lives) he got although I cannot prove it but he closed the accusation very quickly.
And the reason it's brought and mentioned here if you can't prove it, is...?
Sorry, what does this answer mean? what does it have to do with the other member who opened and closed the scam accusation against Blackjack.fun after mine? please elaborate
Why haven't you answered the simple question of whether you've ever played regular Blackjack or Blackjack Tournament at Blackjack.fun???
My guess is that you did not, because it is a simple YES or NO question, and if not, why do you even discuss this bug/exploit issue
My guess is that you did not, because it is a simple YES or NO question, and if not, why do you even discuss this bug/exploit issue
On their platform, no. But playing BJ? Yeah, occasionally, for fun. I can't see how this is relevant to your explanation. If may elaborate, and perhaps begin explaining that way overdue explanation?
sorry again. how can someone discuss a game he did not play at the casino we are discussing here. every casino may have different rules of their blackjack game they offer. means it is very important to visit the casino and play a game or two.
It is even more important to have a deeper knowledge of the blackjack game if we are talking about an exploit and not a simple bug.
Let's see when we can start to have a normal and fair conversation about this matter
Honey... did you bother to read my post on BJF's thread? I inquired them exactly that. If they are yet to answer to my question [that's also asked by several other members], how on earth can I give you an answer and 100% sure about it, if they're yet to answer it? Who do you think I am? NSA?
Due to that very same reason, their silence, is why I proposed to you the possibility that if no one complained on their platform or here, the bug is fixed, as there are chances other also find and could replicate the bug just as you did, tried the bug, and others complained about it. Of which your reply was that can roughly summed up as my proposal is invalid and only shows that I am clueless, and I ask [which yet to be explained up to this point] which part of it is invalid?
Feel free to evade it and give no explanation again, and blabber other things instead.
Due to that very same reason, their silence, is why I proposed to you the possibility that if no one complained on their platform or here, the bug is fixed, as there are chances other also find and could replicate the bug just as you did, tried the bug, and others complained about it. Of which your reply was that can roughly summed up as my proposal is invalid and only shows that I am clueless, and I ask [which yet to be explained up to this point] which part of it is invalid?
Feel free to evade it and give no explanation again, and blabber other things instead.
now you are admitting that you don't know if the bug/exploit is fixed but you cannot say it in a YES or NO
how funny (or not funny) is that?
This single sentence itself is eligible to make us question your logic and [borrowing your way-overused word] IQ. It is honestly frown inducing. Can't you see how that sentence contradict and answer itself? I don't know if the bug is fixed or not [I am currently inquiring about that very thing to Eva], and since I don't know about it, how on earth can I say it in a yes or no? You want me to say "yes"? If then it's not fixed, that'll be misleading. If I say "no" and it actually already fixed, I'll be making a false statement. Can't you see this very simple equation?
Why would someone complain if they don't know what the bug/exploit looks like?
Do you really think that the person who knows and uses it will file a complaint or come here???
Do you really think that the person who knows and uses it will file a complaint or come here???
Hmm... I think it'll be safe to assume and imagine the rough form of that glitch based on your explanation here, or perhaps the ones in a quite detail, given on the opening post. Can't people guess what's the exploit looks like?
The one who opened another scam accusation after me was very quickly satisfied and I am sure it was a nice sum (all in relation to the country he lives) he got although I cannot prove it but he closed the accusation very quickly.
And the reason it's brought and mentioned here if you can't prove it, is...?
Why haven't you answered the simple question of whether you've ever played regular Blackjack or Blackjack Tournament at Blackjack.fun???
My guess is that you did not, because it is a simple YES or NO question, and if not, why do you even discuss this bug/exploit issue
My guess is that you did not, because it is a simple YES or NO question, and if not, why do you even discuss this bug/exploit issue
On their platform, no. But playing BJ? Yeah, occasionally, for fun. I can't see how this is relevant to your explanation. If may elaborate, and perhaps begin explaining that way overdue explanation?
let's try again
is the exploit fixed? can you answer this with 100% YES or NO?
or point me to where Eva or Blckjack.fun owner/developer answered it with a YES or NO
did you every play their Blackjack game Tourneys? YES or NO?
in case of Yes then you should know the difference of their Tourney and the regular game they offer
is the exploit fixed? can you answer this with 100% YES or NO?
or point me to where Eva or Blckjack.fun owner/developer answered it with a YES or NO
did you every play their Blackjack game Tourneys? YES or NO?
in case of Yes then you should know the difference of their Tourney and the regular game they offer
Honey... did you bother to read my post on BJF's thread? I inquired them exactly that. If they are yet to answer to my question [that's also asked by several other members], how on earth can I give you an answer and 100% sure about it, if they're yet to answer it? Who do you think I am? NSA?
Due to that very same reason, their silence, is why I proposed to you the possibility that if no one complained on their platform or here, the bug is fixed, as there are chances other also find and could replicate the bug just as you did, tried the bug, and others complained about it. Of which your reply was that can roughly summed up as my proposal is invalid and only shows that I am clueless, and I ask [which yet to be explained up to this point] which part of it is invalid?
Feel free to evade it and give no explanation again, and blabber other things instead.
now you are admitting that you don't know if the bug/exploit is fixed but you cannot say it in a YES or NO
how funny (or not funny) is that?
Why would someone complain if they don't know what the bug/exploit looks like?
Do you really think that the person who knows and uses it will file a complaint or come here???
The one who opened another scam accusation after me was very quickly satisfied and I am sure it was a nice sum (all in relation to the country he lives) he got although I cannot prove it but he closed the accusation very quickly.
Why haven't you answered the simple question of whether you've ever played regular Blackjack or Blackjack Tournament at Blackjack.fun???
My guess is that you did not, because it is a simple YES or NO question, and if not, why do you even discuss this bug/exploit issue
let's try again
is the exploit fixed? can you answer this with 100% YES or NO?
or point me to where Eva or Blckjack.fun owner/developer answered it with a YES or NO
did you every play their Blackjack game Tourneys? YES or NO?
in case of Yes then you should know the difference of their Tourney and the regular game they offer
is the exploit fixed? can you answer this with 100% YES or NO?
or point me to where Eva or Blckjack.fun owner/developer answered it with a YES or NO
did you every play their Blackjack game Tourneys? YES or NO?
in case of Yes then you should know the difference of their Tourney and the regular game they offer
Honey... did you bother to read my post on BJF's thread? I inquired them exactly that. If they are yet to answer to my question [that's also asked by several other members], how on earth can I give you an answer and 100% sure about it, if they're yet to answer it? Who do you think I am? NSA?
Due to that very same reason, their silence, is why I proposed to you the possibility that if no one complained on their platform or here, the bug is fixed, as there are chances other also find and could replicate the bug just as you did, tried the bug, and others complained about it. Of which your reply was that can roughly summed up as my proposal is invalid and only shows that I am clueless, and I ask [which yet to be explained up to this point] which part of it is invalid?
Feel free to evade it and give no explanation again, and blabber other things instead.
Back at you. You always answering with new blabber instead of clear answer of what I inquire: how my proposal is invalid and only shows that I have no clue about blackjack and its possible exploits. So?
Let's see how long you will play the clown here only to show your signature and get a few sats. let's also see how long your signature manager will watch and allow it
to all other readers of the Scam accusation please also read the Reputation thread from Blackjack.fun. very interesting read for smart people. ( not for clowns )
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5485686.msg63775689;topicseen#msg63775689
Yet another post blabbering and evading to address my inquiry. At this point, you might as well just admit that your dismissal to my proposal is baseless and [guess everybody already figure this one out, though] when you can't answer valid points you'll resort to "play clown" and "get few sats". You know it's ok, right? To be wrong? People does that from time to time, I did that, many did that. In fact, the signs of being a big kid is knowing that you made wrong and acknowledging it. Try it some time, it's good for growth.
let's try again
is the exploit fixed? can you answer this with 100% YES or NO?
or point me to where Eva or Blckjack.fun owner/developer answered it with a YES or NO
did you every play their Blackjack game Tourneys? YES or NO?
in case of Yes then you should know the difference of their Tourney and the regular game they offer
Back at you. You always answering with new blabber instead of clear answer of what I inquire: how my proposal is invalid and only shows that I have no clue about blackjack and its possible exploits. So?
Let's see how long you will play the clown here only to show your signature and get a few sats. let's also see how long your signature manager will watch and allow it
to all other readers of the Scam accusation please also read the Reputation thread from Blackjack.fun. very interesting read for smart people. ( not for clowns )
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5485686.msg63775689;topicseen#msg63775689
Yet another post blabbering and evading to address my inquiry. At this point, you might as well just admit that your dismissal to my proposal is baseless and [guess everybody already figure this one out, though] when you can't answer valid points you'll resort to "play clown" and "get few sats". You know it's ok, right? To be wrong? People does that from time to time, I did that, many did that. In fact, the signs of being a big kid is knowing that you made wrong and acknowledging it. Try it some time, it's good for growth.
why are you talking so much
let us do it short. Eva also is always answering with new stories instead of a clear answer! it is a YES or No Question
just tell me and everyone if the exploit/bug is fixed is it
let us do it short. Eva also is always answering with new stories instead of a clear answer! it is a YES or No Question
just tell me and everyone if the exploit/bug is fixed
is it Back at you. You always answering with new blabber instead of clear answer of what I inquire: how my proposal is invalid and only shows that I have no clue about blackjack and its possible exploits. So?
Let's see how long you will play the clown here only to show your signature and get a few sats. let's also see how long your signature manager will watch and allow it
to all other readers of the Scam accusation please also read the Reputation thread from Blackjack.fun. very interesting read for smart people. ( not for clowns )
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5485686.msg63775689;topicseen#msg63775689
why are you talking so much
let us do it short. Eva also is always answering with new stories instead of a clear answer! it is a YES or No Question
just tell me and everyone if the exploit/bug is fixed is it
let us do it short. Eva also is always answering with new stories instead of a clear answer! it is a YES or No Question
just tell me and everyone if the exploit/bug is fixed
is it Back at you. You always answering with new blabber instead of clear answer of what I inquire: how my proposal is invalid and only shows that I have no clue about blackjack and its possible exploits. So?
[...]
That would be a baseless scam accusation from my side as I am currently not being scammed by you. Unlike you, I am not interested on creating an unfounded scam accusation. Thank you for offering, though.
That would be a baseless scam accusation from my side as I am currently not being scammed by you. Unlike you, I am not interested on creating an unfounded scam accusation. Thank you for offering, though.
Please read back where you wrote
...................when you did the exploit again and again
I repeat
if you think I did use the exploit and won whatever amount then you and/or Blackjack.fun should open a Scam accusation against me. this what I would do if I am in your or BJ.fun shoes
you were not scammed by me but you are the lawyer of BJ.fun
Please try to read a statement in whole, instead of snipping it wherever you like to drive it into a narrative you preferred, disregarding the fact that you distorted the real message it conveys. I mean, come on, I do say that someone can seriously injure themselves if they climb to the height of your ego and immediately jump down to the level of your IQ, but it certainly not that difficult to understand?
But alas, allow me to break this down to you too. The statement is,
[...] Or is it because what I said is actually quite applicable, that someone can discover the bug same as you and they'll probably brought it to attention, much like what happened to you when you did the exploit again and again [instead of reporting it directly to their support] to the one who initially discovered it and they reported you? [...]
it questions the validity of my proposal, that someone can discover the exploit, as in realizing that there is a bug in that game, because someone else use it and they noticed it, much like [get ready for the difficult part to understand... or so it seems, to someone on your level] when they reported you when you did the exploit again and again when you do that maneuver to the one initially discovered it.
Still can't get it? Here, let me try it again: in other words, it questions how your statement applies, that my proposal where, absence of those report, would it not be safe to assume the bug is fixed, since you say that what I try to propose only shows that I have no clue of casino games, especially black jack and its possible exploits.
why are you talking so much
let us do it short. Eva also is always answering with new stories instead of a clear answer! it is a YES or No Question
just tell me and everyone if the exploit/bug is fixed
is it [...]
That would be a baseless scam accusation from my side as I am currently not being scammed by you. Unlike you, I am not interested on creating an unfounded scam accusation. Thank you for offering, though.
That would be a baseless scam accusation from my side as I am currently not being scammed by you. Unlike you, I am not interested on creating an unfounded scam accusation. Thank you for offering, though.
Please read back where you wrote
...................when you did the exploit again and again
I repeat
if you think I did use the exploit and won whatever amount then you and/or Blackjack.fun should open a Scam accusation against me. this what I would do if I am in your or BJ.fun shoes
you were not scammed by me but you are the lawyer of BJ.fun
Please try to read a statement in whole, instead of snipping it wherever you like to drive it into a narrative you preferred, disregarding the fact that you distorted the real message it conveys. I mean, come on, I do say that someone can seriously injure themselves if they climb to the height of your ego and immediately jump down to the level of your IQ, but it certainly not that difficult to understand?
But alas, allow me to break this down to you too. The statement is,
[...] Or is it because what I said is actually quite applicable, that someone can discover the bug same as you and they'll probably brought it to attention, much like what happened to you when you did the exploit again and again [instead of reporting it directly to their support] to the one who initially discovered it and they reported you? [...]
it questions the validity of my proposal, that someone can discover the exploit, as in realizing that there is a bug in that game, because someone else use it and they noticed it, much like [get ready for the difficult part to understand... or so it seems, to someone on your level] when they reported you when you did the exploit again and again when you do that maneuver to the one initially discovered it.
Still can't get it? Here, let me try it again: in other words, it questions how your statement applies, that my proposal where, absence of those report, would it not be safe to assume the bug is fixed, since you say that what I try to propose only shows that I have no clue of casino games, especially black jack and its possible exploits.
Oh, by all means, please do enlighten us on how what I try to convey is invalid. Were you trying to say that it not applicable because no one will be able to be aware of the exploits and replicate the bug, other than you? Or is it because what I said is actually quite applicable, that someone can discover the bug same as you and they'll probably brought it to attention, much like what happened to you when you did the exploit again and again [instead of reporting it directly to their support] to the one who initially discovered it and they reported you? And thus, since what I propose is quite applicable and you can't give a logical rebuttal, you choose to go the other way and made a random statement?
You are proving time and time again that you have no clue whatsoever about the game of Blackjack and its possible exploits/bugs.
Yeah, yeah. No clue about blackjack and possible exploits or bugs and so on and so on. You mind to tell us how is it not possible for anyone else to find it? Or will it be just like this scam accusation: never clearly explained, unfounded, and baseless?
you and Blackjack.fun are very welcome to open a Scam Accusation against me as I did not report the exploit [/b]
LOL
LOL
That would be a baseless scam accusation from my side as I am currently not being scammed by you. Unlike you, I am not interested on creating an unfounded scam accusation. Thank you for offering, though.
Please read back where you wrote
...................when you did the exploit again and again
I repeat
if you think I did use the exploit and won whatever amount then you and/or Blackjack.fun should open a Scam accusation against me.
this what I would do if I am in your or BJ.fun shoes
you were not scammed by me but you are the lawyer of BJ.fun
Oh, by all means, please do enlighten us on how what I try to convey is invalid. Were you trying to say that it not applicable because no one will be able to be aware of the exploits and replicate the bug, other than you? Or is it because what I said is actually quite applicable, that someone can discover the bug same as you and they'll probably brought it to attention, much like what happened to you when you did the exploit again and again [instead of reporting it directly to their support] to the one who initially discovered it and they reported you? And thus, since what I propose is quite applicable and you can't give a logical rebuttal, you choose to go the other way and made a random statement?
You are proving time and time again that you have no clue whatsoever about the game of Blackjack and its possible exploits/bugs.
Yeah, yeah. No clue about blackjack and possible exploits or bugs and so on and so on. You mind to tell us how is it not possible for anyone else to find it? Or will it be just like this scam accusation: never clearly explained, unfounded, and baseless?
you and Blackjack.fun are very welcome to open a Scam Accusation against me as I did not report the exploit [/b]
LOL
LOL
That would be a baseless scam accusation from my side as I am currently not being scammed by you. Unlike you, I am not interested on creating an unfounded scam accusation. Thank you for offering, though.
Alternatively, if no one complained about that issue, not here or on their chat box, wouldn't it be safe to assume they've fixed that problem? Will it too far fetched to assume someone will also notice how to replicate that bug, and someone else will notice [thus complained] about it on their platform or here on their ANN? Or does it absolutely have to be you the one that verifies it so everybody can rest assured? If so, how do you propose to prove that it is indeed fixed, in a sense that you will not --out of spite-- say it is not fixed yet although [we suppose] it already is, just to stir the pot further?
Thanks for actually declaring and advertising that you have no clue of casino games and especially no clue about Black Jack
and exploits.
just stay out of discussions about game exploits
Oh, by all means, please do enlighten us on how what I try to convey is invalid. Were you trying to say that it not applicable because no one will be able to be aware of the exploits and replicate the bug, other than you? Or is it because what I said is actually quite applicable, that someone can discover the bug same as you and they'll probably brought it to attention, much like what happened to you when you did the exploit again and again [instead of reporting it directly to their support] to the one who initially discovered it and they reported you? And thus, since what I propose is quite applicable and you can't give a logical rebuttal, you choose to go the other way and made a random statement?
You are proving time and time again that you have no clue whatsoever about the game of Blackjack and its possible exploits/bugs.
you and Blackjack.fun are very welcome to open a Scam Accusation against me as I did not report the exploit [/b]
LOL
Alternatively, if no one complained about that issue, not here or on their chat box, wouldn't it be safe to assume they've fixed that problem? Will it too far fetched to assume someone will also notice how to replicate that bug, and someone else will notice [thus complained] about it on their platform or here on their ANN? Or does it absolutely have to be you the one that verifies it so everybody can rest assured? If so, how do you propose to prove that it is indeed fixed, in a sense that you will not --out of spite-- say it is not fixed yet although [we suppose] it already is, just to stir the pot further?
Thanks for actually declaring and advertising that you have no clue of casino games and especially no clue about Black Jack
and exploits.
just stay out of discussions about game exploits
Oh, by all means, please do enlighten us on how what I try to convey is invalid. Were you trying to say that it not applicable because no one will be able to be aware of the exploits and replicate the bug, other than you? Or is it because what I said is actually quite applicable, that someone can discover the bug same as you and they'll probably brought it to attention, much like what happened to you when you did the exploit again and again [instead of reporting it directly to their support] to the one who initially discovered it and they reported you? And thus, since what I propose is quite applicable and you can't give a logical rebuttal, you choose to go the other way and made a random statement?
It is easier to say words out of emotions without having a calculation accuracy.....
It is possible that you may not be able to withdraw your winnings from the bitcoingirl.club or any of their gambling site and the problem might be that you are faulty during registration or you were unable to read their proms and cons after registration.......
.
You were not able to read the terms and conditions of the game before starting the play the gamor staking I must tell you these are some minors that we all failed to understand when registering anything at all you refused to read the terms and conditions we only scroll up very fast to accept and agree to the terms and conditions it is very difficult for this generation to understand how to read stuffs like that systematically and also understand it better to know if that is what you are comfortable doing if the conduit is really fair or unfair to you before sign I don't believe it is actually a scam
Please let's be guided before making any statements in my humble opinion thanks 🙏👍
It is possible that you may not be able to withdraw your winnings from the bitcoingirl.club or any of their gambling site and the problem might be that you are faulty during registration or you were unable to read their proms and cons after registration.......
.
You were not able to read the terms and conditions of the game before starting the play the gamor staking I must tell you these are some minors that we all failed to understand when registering anything at all you refused to read the terms and conditions we only scroll up very fast to accept and agree to the terms and conditions it is very difficult for this generation to understand how to read stuffs like that systematically and also understand it better to know if that is what you are comfortable doing if the conduit is really fair or unfair to you before sign I don't believe it is actually a scam
Please let's be guided before making any statements in my humble opinion thanks 🙏👍
Umm... here's a small help: BitcoinGirl.Club is a username of a forum member, not a casino. The casino being
Thanks alot my amiable comrade for your humble response Ans correction I so much appreciated it from the dept of my. Heart ....
Thanks
Jump to: