A little confusion on your example, it basically shows a case where an investor-potential whom a developer can't get in touch with, to convince him to invest, are now within reach as the developer ask something to the said investor-potential using your platform, thus gain his interest? And what would the question be, then? "Hi, can you review my proposal?"
You are right. The developer gets the opportunity to contact the investor, but no more.
The developer should carefully approach the choice of the investor (read the description on his account, use the filter with AI). Smart developers usually know in advance who they need from investors (so they can do just a search by name).
"Hi, can you review my proposal?"
Yes, the question may be like this. But I would add it.
We don't guarantee that the investor will be interested in the project. But he will write his opinion and this will help the developer to improve his project/idea.
We just give the opportunity to contact. And what users will talk about and what results they will get is their business. We only control the quality of the answer (it can be negative).
So they will have to pay to get an investor? Sounds a little counterproductive to me, especially as you also claimed yourself that the price won't be cheap. Plus, there's no guarantee that it will be the investor himself that read and give advise. I would imagine some of those expert investors run a lot of business and would probably have no time to read three to five emails asking them to read their proposal because of the payment (that's probably seems small for the investor, but big for a startup project). Afterall, that's why CEO and other businessman have PA.
We give the opportunity to contact. And this is incredibly important for new startups. We personally faced this when we started our work. And yes! We were ready to pay, if only the right person read our letter! Because we were sure that our project could be really interesting! But we received only the standard answer.
The price will determine what expart want to receive from his services. Smart people are able to estimate their time. If the expert realizes that 3-5 emails a day is too much, he can put a cosmic price and will receive one email per year. Moreover, the expert has a few days to reply.
Only account owner (not their helpers) can reply to messages.
I can assume that you are not a founder of a startup ... so you cannot fully understand the importance of our idea. But each day we receiving proposals from investors, which ready to buy our tokens. It suggests that we are doing right things.
There will be no denying that having an investor interest is an important thing for startup, the question lies on whether those startups think it's a good idea to spend some of their limited fund to pay highly for something that's still uncertain. Uncertain not only in the sense if the investor will invest ot not, but also on who actually reads the proposal-disguised-in-question. Thus, my question on how could you be certain that the one read and reply will be
the investor themselves instead of their PA. Sure, you can set a rule where only the account owner can reply to messages, but it's not necessarily means the original owner (the investor) give their PA access to their device where the account to your platform are logged into. Thus, ultimately, the PA are the ones replying
