Topic: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper - page 2. (Read 25233 times)

Looking forward to it.

You should probably start a new thread when you do.

I will link it here at the end of August once it's reviewed 

Link to the paper?

So, I don't know if anyone still cares, but my paper is finished. I haven't defended yet so I don't want o post it until it's approved by my supervisor and oponent, but it was a really interesting rabbit hole to go down. The people I uncluded in this research were: Satoshi, CSW, Nick Szabo, Mike Hearn, Hal Finney, and Gavin Andresen.

Couple thoughts:

• First, it's a real shame that Wright only started his Twitter account after I started working, since that would be a much better source of writings. In style, tweets are more similar to forum posts than website blog posts, which is what I ended up using. Same was the case with Nick Szabo, and both of these authors clustered quite far away from the others in 2 out of 3 of my analyses. The sentences are longer, the language more academic, it's just not quite the same. That being said, we still would have seen some kind of clustering or similarities if Wright were Nakamoto. One of the analysis methods I used was not affected by these stylistic differences and Wright still appeared really far away from Nakamoto.
• Second, only after last month's release of that 'Finding Satoshi Nakamoto' book (which is also the tytle of my paper, ugh) did I hear about Bilal Khalid for the first time. Quite a shame, might have been interesting to include him in this. Any thoughts on Khalid's claims?

Conclusion:
I will be defending my thesis in August and was invited to give a speech at a conference in Budapest in September, so it will be out there soon. You will be able to see all the data, methods, graphs, and a list of links to all the forum posts / blog posts I used as material. Aside from Satoshi and the six candidates, we also had two control authors, both users of this forum.
Now, the results are not the most groundbreaking, we mostly just ruled out a couple of people with relative confidence (CSW lol). We also more or less ruled out the possibility of Satoshi being multiple people (or, more accurately, that the 'satoshi' account on here was most likely managed by one person.) His samples would simply not cluster so consistently across all 44 analyses, 40 of which utilized 5,000 randomly selected tokens out of each author's texts.
There was no match I can say with confidence as being 'most likely Nakamoto' and I would hesitate to even say someone is 'likely' to be Nakamoto, but I will mention that the closest to him out of everyone was Hal Finney. Neither Andresen nor Hearn particularly stood out.

Actually, Craig tried arguing that the intended 'recovery' of 'his' coins from the BitcoincashSV chain would be sufficient for him to prove he has enough assets to cover a potential loss in the COPA case, but that was rejected as the Master Clark pointed out that such an action could only properly be used if he was able to verify ownership of those coins independently of the private keys. Something we know he cannot do because all his "I am Satoshi" supposed proof was exposed as mere fakes and forgeries during the Kleiman case.

Thing is, we know that nChain is in majority control of the BSV network so they could potentially just force it through, but it is good to see that the legal process has already pointed out that it would not be proper for them to do so without there being suitable proof that the person trying to 'recover' said coins actually owns them. This is what is going to fuck Craig up in the coming cases. Where the Kleiman action was a ridiculous sham where neither side contested his "I am Satoshi" claim because it suited their purposes, neither Hodlonaut nor COPA cases are based on that same premise and Craig's claim to be Satoshi has even been raised as a particular reason for why a number of damning pieces of evidence from the Kleiman case were accepted for the COPA case, "In my judgement, these questions are exactly the kind of debate which will need to be had in order to test the defendant’s claim that he is indeed Satoshi Nakamoto.".

So not only does Craig have to come up with a not-insignificant security deposit for the COPA case, he will also have to explain away his forgeries AND proffer up actual proof that he is Satoshi, something he has utterly failed to do and, in fact, something which directly led to him fleeing Australia when he repeatedly failed to do so for the ATO which, had he simply performed a legitimate signing or moved a coin, would have exonerated him over the multi-million-dollar cash rebate fraud he is likely to end up facing extradition over in the next few years.

(And this is ignoring his NSW SC fraudulent cases where he lied in court, filed fake valuations and forged signatures on backdated contracts, made false police reports to the UK police over a hack for which there is no evidence it ever happened and where he lied about ADT UK's data centre having an outage and losing the footage of the 'pineapple' being planted, plus a litany of 'minor' frauds like filing fake backdated company appointments for a dead guy etc.)

All in, Craig Wright is finally going to see his multi-year frauds catch up with him and it will be glorious.

satoshi ? ===> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bjarne_Stroustrup

This here forum has its own unmoderated threads regarding bcash SV as well...   I posted in one such thread, yesterday.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-bsv-bitcoin-sv-satoshi-vision-unmoderated-thread-5216304

BSV IS A WAY FOR CRAIG WRIGHT TO PAY BAIL? LAWYER PLS

ONLY SCAMMERS REMOVE POSTS LIKE THAT REEEEEE

No wonder when you see that his idol and master is notorious Klaus Schwab from world economic forum cult, and Bitcoin SV appears to be his little slave  

Meanwhile everyone can read uncensored bsv topic on ninjastic.space:
https://ninjastic.space/topic/4985868

So  .... 1529 posts critical of bsv and  96 people under
censorship

Post deletion from bsv topic continues and it's now 1529 posts by 96 users with 317 merit deleted! 

Interesting article to read coming from Decrpyt named Craig Wright Didn’t 'Win' Anything (Except a lot of undeserved attention).
https://decrypt.co/87873/craig-wright-didnt-win-anything

21 from me.

Lol I've had 55 deleted posts so far. Pathetic

---

https://decrypt.co/87873/craig-wright-didnt-win-anything

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

BSV Scammers are now claiming some Pyrrhic victory, CSW has to pay $100 million fine and he still didn't prove he is Satoshi and signed his keys.
Member Bitcoin SV is so retarded and mentally ill that he is going in history and deleting many posts from his self moderated topic.
Deleted stats (going up all he time): 979 posts by 43 users with 89 merit deleted  

EDIT: 1284 posts by 60 users with 163 merit deleted (and still going up...)

Craig Wright AKA Forgetoshi caught forging again, exhibit from the coming Kleiman case:

https://twitter.com/hascendp6/status/1446266504002015236

ShitshowSV delisted from another exchange:
https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1446517333791494145

bUt iT hAs AlrEadY WoN

Some more documents uploaded this week. One is a timeline of all the times Craig referred to Dave as his "partner" (boring), and another is why Craig's subpoena for Kleiman's "encrypted and wiped" devices is unenforceable. Kind of interesting.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/kleiman-v-wright/?page=5


Then later in the argument:


The rest of the documents mainly have to do with the prosecutor's plaintiff's rationale as to why Craig's transcripts from ATO hearings should be admissable in court.

Here's an interesting excerpt:


So it seems BSV is just a continuation of Craig's specialty of employment: investing massive amounts of time, thought and energy into a product never designed to work in the first place. He's obviously a smart fellow in some ways, probably could have made a pretty decent shitcoin of his own without having to attach the name of Bitcoin to it.

Oh and this is Craig giving his closing remarks at the Bitcoin SV conference, to a thrilled crowd of believers.



After crashing to fresh lows against BTC shortly thereafter, the price of BSV enjoyed a nice 17% pump today.

Short 'em if you got 'em.

FTFY

Thanks for the update and the description of what is going on.

Just want to note that you may have made a Freudian slip, since there is no prosecution in this case.

There are plaintiffs and defendants because this is a civil case.

If this were a criminal case, there would be a prosecutor, and sure many of us wish to see a prosecutor to come to some case in which CSW et al seem to be abusing the process and lying to the court.... Maybe in the future?  We will see.

Some news lately in the court case against our old friend Craiggy Boy.

On the heels of the defense's motion to introduce electronic devices as evidence (supposedly these devices contain proof that exonerates Craig from wrongdoing but are encrypted and wiped), the prosecution plaintiffs filed a brief to "support the demonstrative they intend to use" in the trial's opening, which will be a jury trial.

The opening of the brief:


That last part is particularly compelling. I wonder what excuse he would have for objecting to his own thoughts. Maybe his thoughts were controlled by Blockstream radio rays at the time, but more likely its simply a matter of his Asperger's, which is where he gets his profound genius from after all.

Among the things Craig does not want the defense to mention are statements he made to the Australian Tax Office, such as:


All the other quotables Craig is objecting to have to do with the partnership, which I could care less about because its all fake. But Dave mining Bitcoin and them having only "$100 million" in Bitcoin (telling tall tales even back then) doesn't really make a whole lot of sense. Even back in 2013 the market cap was already over $1 billion, and Satoshi's share of mined coins was a much greater %. Maybe Craig will say he mined Bitcoin on the side as cover to distance himself from being a S.N. suspect.

Amazingly the charade continues. At the rate that things are going, the price of BSV will have wound down to close to zero by the time this thing wraps up, maybe around the year 2025.

The next hearing is on Oct. 14th.