Topic: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper - page 2. (Read 25829 times)

BSV Terranode is processing millions of TPS now.  That's scaling.

https://www.bsvblockchain.org/news/bsv-blockchain-capabilities-set-to-break-boundaries-in-2024-with-latest-teranode-innovations

The real battle ended years ago: virtually nobody takes BSV seriously anymore, and even fewer people still actually believe Craig is Satoshi.



Even I think BSV @ $35 is a fair price.


Independent of the fact that its such a hacky, elementary school solution to say that "increasing the block size = scaling", an important piece of info you seem to be overlooking: nobody wants to use a coin run by a con artist.

You're right. It's probably closer to 50/50 at this point in the trial.  I was mostly just poking the hornets nest and am surprised by the mostly muted response.  I think some of you have maybe lost some of the wind in your sails.

---

You got me.  I'm mostly just trying to be optimistic because the world needs a coin that scales and everyone knows BTC doesn't.

---

I've been mining BSV since 2021.  I think I'm doing alright.  The upside is going to be huge if he wins... like astronomical if he wins.

If he loses I can't see BSV going lower than $35 / coin.

Trying to pump in some sense in to the head of a BSV shill is a waste of time. It's like giving a pig a cake and expect it to eat it with dignity. It won't, it will plow it down and roll it all over the ground as though it was eating leftovers from a garbage pit 

He just came here to day the fraudster will win, but doesn't even mention why he thinks he will win.

Lolz this has turn to gambling and gambling is always on 50/50 either you win or you loss. If he is a fan of Craig then he wants his guy to win the COPA Trial because they must support their fans. But I don't see him winning the case because if he was the real creator of Bitcoin then it is very simple to know since Bitcoin is a decentralized digital currency, Craig Wright move a specific amount or unit of Bitcoin from the Genesis Block to another wallet then return it back and if he can do it then we will believe that he is one.

Craig Wright can't just come to the public and says he is the creator of Bitcoin. He has a lot of things to do to prove himself and I am not seeing any one bit for him to win any case at anywhere. Though I didn't follow up the case but I doubt seriously for him to win. JayJuanGee said 50/50 but I will say 0. Many Bitcoin early Bitcoin users even against him. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theblock.co/amp/post/278662/early-bitcoin-contributors-testify-against-craig-wright-at-copa-trial

So you've been holding on to a bags full of bsv shitcoins since 2021? How is it going for you so far?
Have you considered what will happen when this lying scumbag loses this trial?

That is very wishful-thinking of you.  I'm not sure of your odds, but seems to be less than 50/50 from my limited point of view and some of the pieces of information (evidence and testimony) that I have heard about related to the trial, so far.

Craig is going to win this COPA trial and there's going to be a lot of cope here. 

A couple interesting tidbits to report on. Firstly, after 5 years, Craig's lawsuit against Peter McCormack came to its final end:



Second, the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), an organization formed in 2021 to counter Craig's pursuit of a copyright on the Bitcoin white paper, rejected a settlement offer from Craig. The rejection comes after experts from both COPA and Craig found that the documents he submitted to prove he was Satoshi had been forged (and not only that, assuredly forged by Craig himself). Some of the biggest findings:



This one struck me as particularly hilarious:



Price of BSV is down 5% for the day.

This ...

Is one of the reasons I have stayed away and 'watched' - since My direct disgust of Craig Wright and his farce.

Time is a good thing.

Craig is a Disgusting Human - Period! Let alone his foray into the fools world of Lies and Deceit. He is far from the King of Fools, but he certainly is high up on the list.

It is about time that the Rope that has been allowed by the 'Legal' System for Craig to be Yanked in hard - and Hang the Disgusting Person he is - in Public. A financial execution that can be rivalled by none.

If the FACTS of the past few years have not proved that he is just another Little Boy 'pretending' (apologies - I need to use the word 'identifying' now) to be anything else but a charlatan of the Crypto world, then the World needs to look closely at the so called 'Justice' System that Craig and his minions has to easily manipulated, with the use of the Money he has accrued through this entire lineage of deceit.

#crysx #cwi

Just want to reanimate this thread confirm that I am indeed the @Dogermint twitter account... In retrospect, can't believe this thread went for 79 pages  it must be the longest scam accusation thread ever, even without a post in over a year. I know a lot has happened since then (almost all of it bad for Craig and BSV), but today I found a special reason to post here once again.

In response to a series of tweets by recently-former nChain CEO, Christen Ager-Hanssen (@agerhanssen), I felt compelled to write my own tweet on what I have endured since penning the OP of this thread, and why its important that people like Christen be supported going forward.



Here is the contents of my tweet if you'd rather not visit twitter (or X, rather):


If you have followed the faketoshi saga at all, I highly recommend reading @agerhanssen's most recent tweets, they are very enlightening, even if we've known for 4 years it was all a scam to begin with.

CSW vs Hodlonaut case observer thread. Seems quite updated.

Not sure if this has been posted elsewhere, but thought this was as good as place as any for CSW updates - new court case this week:


Source: https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2022/09/12/who-can-say-who-is-not-satoshi-hodlonaut-and-wright-go-to-trial-to-find-out/

I had thought this was over a long time ago after all the previous drama, but then I realised it's not 


If any see any further updates about this case can you post them here? Or if there's a thread let me know? Thanks.

Alright, for anyone still following and interested, I defended my thesis today and received an A. Since it's been reviewed, you all can view it here: https://theses.cz/id/x3hbif/Levyova_-_Finding_Bitcoins_Creator_Satoshi_Nakamoto.pdf.

In the citations, you can see a comprehensive list of links to all the posts from this forum that I used for the analyses themselves, as well as links to articles from CSW and Nick Szabo.

Thank you to all who answered my questions and helped me get into this topic, it's been really interesting 

Looking forward to it.

You should probably start a new thread when you do.

I will link it here at the end of August once it's reviewed 

Link to the paper?

So, I don't know if anyone still cares, but my paper is finished. I haven't defended yet so I don't want o post it until it's approved by my supervisor and oponent, but it was a really interesting rabbit hole to go down. The people I uncluded in this research were: Satoshi, CSW, Nick Szabo, Mike Hearn, Hal Finney, and Gavin Andresen.

Couple thoughts:

• First, it's a real shame that Wright only started his Twitter account after I started working, since that would be a much better source of writings. In style, tweets are more similar to forum posts than website blog posts, which is what I ended up using. Same was the case with Nick Szabo, and both of these authors clustered quite far away from the others in 2 out of 3 of my analyses. The sentences are longer, the language more academic, it's just not quite the same. That being said, we still would have seen some kind of clustering or similarities if Wright were Nakamoto. One of the analysis methods I used was not affected by these stylistic differences and Wright still appeared really far away from Nakamoto.
• Second, only after last month's release of that 'Finding Satoshi Nakamoto' book (which is also the tytle of my paper, ugh) did I hear about Bilal Khalid for the first time. Quite a shame, might have been interesting to include him in this. Any thoughts on Khalid's claims?

Conclusion:
I will be defending my thesis in August and was invited to give a speech at a conference in Budapest in September, so it will be out there soon. You will be able to see all the data, methods, graphs, and a list of links to all the forum posts / blog posts I used as material. Aside from Satoshi and the six candidates, we also had two control authors, both users of this forum.
Now, the results are not the most groundbreaking, we mostly just ruled out a couple of people with relative confidence (CSW lol). We also more or less ruled out the possibility of Satoshi being multiple people (or, more accurately, that the 'satoshi' account on here was most likely managed by one person.) His samples would simply not cluster so consistently across all 44 analyses, 40 of which utilized 5,000 randomly selected tokens out of each author's texts.
There was no match I can say with confidence as being 'most likely Nakamoto' and I would hesitate to even say someone is 'likely' to be Nakamoto, but I will mention that the closest to him out of everyone was Hal Finney. Neither Andresen nor Hearn particularly stood out.

Actually, Craig tried arguing that the intended 'recovery' of 'his' coins from the BitcoincashSV chain would be sufficient for him to prove he has enough assets to cover a potential loss in the COPA case, but that was rejected as the Master Clark pointed out that such an action could only properly be used if he was able to verify ownership of those coins independently of the private keys. Something we know he cannot do because all his "I am Satoshi" supposed proof was exposed as mere fakes and forgeries during the Kleiman case.

Thing is, we know that nChain is in majority control of the BSV network so they could potentially just force it through, but it is good to see that the legal process has already pointed out that it would not be proper for them to do so without there being suitable proof that the person trying to 'recover' said coins actually owns them. This is what is going to fuck Craig up in the coming cases. Where the Kleiman action was a ridiculous sham where neither side contested his "I am Satoshi" claim because it suited their purposes, neither Hodlonaut nor COPA cases are based on that same premise and Craig's claim to be Satoshi has even been raised as a particular reason for why a number of damning pieces of evidence from the Kleiman case were accepted for the COPA case, "In my judgement, these questions are exactly the kind of debate which will need to be had in order to test the defendant’s claim that he is indeed Satoshi Nakamoto.".

So not only does Craig have to come up with a not-insignificant security deposit for the COPA case, he will also have to explain away his forgeries AND proffer up actual proof that he is Satoshi, something he has utterly failed to do and, in fact, something which directly led to him fleeing Australia when he repeatedly failed to do so for the ATO which, had he simply performed a legitimate signing or moved a coin, would have exonerated him over the multi-million-dollar cash rebate fraud he is likely to end up facing extradition over in the next few years.

(And this is ignoring his NSW SC fraudulent cases where he lied in court, filed fake valuations and forged signatures on backdated contracts, made false police reports to the UK police over a hack for which there is no evidence it ever happened and where he lied about ADT UK's data centre having an outage and losing the footage of the 'pineapple' being planted, plus a litany of 'minor' frauds like filing fake backdated company appointments for a dead guy etc.)

All in, Craig Wright is finally going to see his multi-year frauds catch up with him and it will be glorious.