I'm certain that neither Craig or Dave had anything to do with the creation of Bitcoin, whatsoever.
...snip...
He also introduced the fraud Craig Wright as Satoshi. Why?
Information - not mis - information, u just missed that, now you re biased and ad hominem idiot anyway - again, what 'good' are you doing here? Tellin ppl ad hominem is the thing in Bitcoin ?
Gavin 'visited' the CIA to 'talk' about Bitcoin ...
Topic: Gavin will visit the CIA-
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/gavin-will-visit-the-cia-66521. He is either complicit in participating in a failed 'takeover' / 'hijack' of the Bitcoin (BTC) project.
or
2. He was genuinely 'bamboozled' by CSW - which would happen to be extreemly 'convenient' given the now hard evidence presented to the court ...
Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper-
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54513860... i.e. perhaps Gavin is/was 'complicate' in supporting the CSW / BSV
'fraud' !?
Either way it is still a total clown show! ...
Dan Kaminsky's Blog - Validating Satoshi (Or Not)-
https://dankaminsky.com/2016/05/02/validating-satoshi-or-not/"SUMMARY:
Yes, this is a scam. Not maybe. Not possibly."
...
Proof-of-beats - Signal - To - Noise Ratio -- Vitalik Mic Drop-
https://soundcloud.com/proofofbeats/signal-to-noise-ratio-vitalik-mic-drop ...
The funniest part (for me) is I'm now actually 99.9% certain I know who the real Satoshi Nakamoto is. They genuinely went onto work on 'other things' and from what I've been able to research thus far, I'm both impressed and reassured.
If Gavin and some other folks don't actually know who the real Satoshi likely is then I'm afraid to say that a lot of people in the Bitcoin / crypto space that I once thought were very smart are in fact quite the opposite, and/or were simply following others 'agendas' or, like I said above ... fully complicate.
Craig Wright is NOT satoshi and BSV is NOT Bitcoin.The BSV 'metanet' is an insecure joke, 'built' on quick sand ...
-
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54518146Bitcoin Cash (BCH) is also NOT Bitcoin. It is a minority fork ... the real satoshi told us what happens to minority (chain) forks here ...
...snip...
Satoshi did anticipate forks and the likely outcome ...
A second version would be a massive development and maintenance hassle for me. It's hard enough maintaining backward compatibility while upgrading the network without a second version locking things in. If the second version screwed up, the user experience would reflect badly on both, although it would at least reinforce to users the importance of staying with the official version. If someone was getting ready to fork a second version, I would have to air a lot of disclaimers about the risks of using a minority version. This is a design where the majority version wins if there's any disagreement, and that can be pretty ugly for the minority version and I'd rather not go into it, and I don't have to as long as there's only one version.
I know, most developers don't like their software forked, but I have real technical reasons in this case.
...snip...
Satoshi warned us alright.
...snip...
Bitcoin = BTC which is the official and original version of the software ...
-
https://web.archive.org/web/20090303195936/http://bitcoin.org/...
You also mentioned Jon Matonis earlier in this thread @hv_ ...
Who was on nChain's payroll at one time ... and seemingly likes to try and 'backdoor' cryptography 'products' for the 'highest bidder' ...
Hushmail To Warn Users of Law Enforcement Backdoor-
https://www.wired.com/2007/11/hushmail-to-war/-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hushmail-
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Jon_MatonisJon Matonis Joins Blockchain Pioneer nChain as Vice President of Corporate Strategy-
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/jon-matonis-joins-blockchain-pioneer-nchain-as-vice-president-of-corporate-strategy-300449153.html Anymore for anymore ?
...
...snip...
Just interesting. What is your idea who is satoshi? Me personal think its a team
Unfortunately, that's not how this works. It's seemingly Nakamoto's (current) choice. I can respect that decision.
If I'm right, they may surface again, eventually.
"I can neither confirm nor deny the identity of Satoshi."Having looked for who was
not Satoshi for years, I'm actually surprised how easy it was to find this highly likely candidate. I stumbled upon it actually, everything fits together perfectly.
It became a
team, if you will, however the originator was seemingly just one individual.
Hal was likely more involved than he let on, he may or may not of known the real identity of Nakamoto.
Again,
"I can neither confirm nor deny the identity of Satoshi."...
If your read this,
Nakamoto ... and you are in fact 'Satoshi' ... then you know I know ...
Re: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto ? Suspects, frauds and conspiracies on bitcointalk-
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54513677 ...
Looks like Dave started 'researching' Bitcoin (and Satoshi), as he would of seen the software release via the 'cypherpunks' mailing list ...
-
https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2009-January/thread.html#15014"Bitcoin v0.1 released - Satoshi Nakamoto - Fri Jan 16 11:03:14 EST 2009" ...-
https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2009-January/015014.html[heise online UK] Secure deletion: a single overwrite will do it - Dave Kleiman - Tue Jan 20 19:18:39 EST 2009-
https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2009-January/015029.htmlWhich is why I remember this ...
I, BitcoinFX hereby state that when I started mining bitcoin in early 2010 I used the following windows program (Prio)
-
https://www.prnwatch.com/prio/ - to watch all incoming and outgoing TCP/IP connections to the Bitcoin network from my home PC, which was fully port forwarded on 8333.
I distinctly recall resolving the website of said Dave Kleiman, as to this effect, the domain name was also acting as a bitcoin P2P node.
Either ... www. DigitalComputerForensicExpert .com or www. DaveKleiman .com or www. ComputerForensicExaminer .com
The website had a distinct design that stuck in my memory coupled with the fact that, as an individual who had recently discovered Bitcoin, this reassured myself that other IT professionals were interested in the project (if only from a research / testing standpoint).
Kindest Regards,
So, maybe Dave mined some Bitcoin, maybe he didn't!
...
"It was on my to do list for a separate tweet. But while flip flopping between all these docs... man. It's amazing. These guys are talking about 2 people who had nothing to do with Bitcoin whatsoever and they're spending millions to *prove* one or both *might* have been involved."-
https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1264241187306774529...
"One of them only has a mindboggling list of forgeries, the other only has 2 extremely weak hearsay anecdotes and a TXT file "is this a Satoshi address?".
And they invented Bitcoin together. Right. *facepalm* "-
https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1264242167410839552...
Literally, ROTFLSHMSFOAIDMT ...
...
Bran Van 3000 - Drinking in L.A. (Official Music Video) - Best Quality-
https://youtu.be/OQsQZvsR_QI