In a situation where there is my word against your word, the background is all that matters. As for the proof, I already have it the way I like it the most --- in the form of empirical evidence. If you want to have it go get it.
Oh yes, internet bragging, let's try it.
I have 20+ years of software development experience and last time I was working 9-5 I was herding software architects who would design a spaceship when the customer asked for a toaster, does that make me smarter than you? More capable of identifying frauds like CSW?
Or perhaps we should just stick to perjury and inability to sign a message and other obvious signs of him being a fraud.
Another gem, proving what level of maturity we are really having here:
If you don't like the self-moderated thread - don't post there. Complaining about it here is off topic.
If you're so smart then why aren't you rich yet? I bought into BitCoin when it was trading at 4$ each. Got discouraged by tons of Bitcoin-deniers back then just like I am discouraged by Craig-deniers right here. Turned out pretty well for me in 2012. Wouldn't have to work a day in my life, but I will, because I love my job so much (developing video games).
It's laughable what stunts some of you guys are willing to make just to keep denying the possibility that Craig might actually be Satoshi. You are ignoring someone, who invested in BitCoin in 2012, became rich thanks to that, has master's degree in software engineering and 15 years of field practice as a software architect. Not only that, I have provably predicted 2 BitCoin bubbles in the past in this very same forum (the threads are still here) and I was first to start encoding images on the BitCoin's block chain with
https://cryptograffiti.info/ which I single-handedly developed in the beginning of 2014.
It's incredible that you are willing to ignore and reject all that just so you could keep on believing the popular lies about Craig. Simply incredible. In the world of reasonable people, my personal achievements in life alone are enough for someone to take my words seriously. I know this, because I have turned MANY people from Craig-deniers into Craig-belivers in person. It's because during in-person conversations it's much harder to ignore the other person's credibility in the field of discussion. And I know for fact, that I have credibility, so don't try to pretend my personal achievements are nothing. We all know, that in the real world, all of this matters. You can talk whatever you want, but if you don't have achievements backing up your words then you are a big zero. But here, we apparently don't have many reasonable people and thus we see manufactured conversations, in which the real purpose is to brainwash unsuspecting fools into believing the lies and not to figure out what the truth is.
The good news is, Craig will prove in multiple courts this year with real evidence (not digital signatures which are not even real signatures in terms of law) that he created BitCoin, and when that happens, I expect some of you here to PM me an apology.
