So do all BSV shillers actually believe Craig is Satoshi ? Or are they literally trolling on a completely different level ?
I haven't exactly followed the hole Bsv shit-show , but how can these plebs actually believe Craig is Satoshi simply because he said so ??
There would be countless of ways to prove it , if infact he was , but he failed to provide any proof . So why do people actually believe it just cause that man is spreading this crap everywhere " I am Satoshi "
How? Maybe if you have master's degree in software engineering, bachelor in informatics and 15 years of experience as a software architect, then you can make your own educated decisions listening to the man himself rather than the social media? As a professional in my field (which many people simply are not) I can say with absolute certainty that Craig is Satoshi. So your whole assumption is wrong, no one on the BSV side is believing anyone "simply because he said so". However, you on the other hand, very much show the attributes of a person who believes the anti-Craig propaganda simply because sociopaths such as OneMegGreg said so. Oh, and most importantly, I've got empirical evidence that Craig is Satoshi. You can't beat it with any other kind of evidence.
You want to see what it looks like to have empirical evidence, then watch this:
https://youtu.be/ji2p5pxURVsYou're certainly awful at realizing when you're being conned. None of your impressive education helped you become wiser in that regard.
I watched a minute and a half of your YouTube video and I thought the same thing I've always thought about Craig: holy shit, this guy is an absolute fucking fraud.
You look at this video and you claim it is "empirical evidence" that Craig is Satoshi.
I look at this video and use it to come to the exact opposite conclusion.
Do you see how useless your "empirical evidence" is yet?
Produce some real evidence and as I said earlier, I won't contest it. I will let it be evaluated by others. What you've produced so far is just jokes.
As for what Andresen actually believes regarding Craig, let's be fair. He said
this in 2016, yet BSV shills continue to misrepresent his words:
Now that six months have gone past, I’m being asked if I still think Craig Wright was Satoshi.
I think there are two possibilities.
Either he was Satoshi, but really wants the world to think he isn’t, so he created an impossible-to-untangle web of truths, half-truths and lies. And ruined his reputation in the process.
If he was Satoshi, we should respect his wish to remain anonymous, and ignore him.
The other possibility is he is a master scammer/fraudster who managed to trick some pretty smart people over a period of several years.
In which case everybody except the victims of his fraud and law enforcement working on behalf of those victims should ignore him.
So, either he was or he wasn’t. In either case, we should ignore him. I regret ever getting involved in the “who was Satoshi” game, and am going to spend my time on more fun and productive pursuits.
So Andresen believes there's an equal chance that Craig is a "master scammer." The narrative that he completely believes Wright is Satoshi has been bogus since before BSV was even an idea. Either way, he clearly says Wright should be ignored. And I accept an appeal to Andresen's authority on bitcoin over yours every day of the week.
Vitalik mic drop moment about Faketoshi:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qLI3VIHuKU
