Author

Topic: [SCAM] KEPLER - Next Generation Blockchain Platform For AI & Robotics🚀 - page 199. (Read 68736 times)

full member
Activity: 756
Merit: 101
what will happen to the unsold tokens if there will be any?





Private investors will buy all unsold tokens in a higher than ICO price.
member
Activity: 308
Merit: 12
Hello guys, congratulations to the team after first round completed, huge success. Lets see the next round!!
Just a reminder, we still have the airdrop on going, around 160 slots available for KEP tokens.
Good luck to everyone.

Oh thanks for the reminder. I totally forgot about the airdrop.
full member
Activity: 952
Merit: 156
KOL Manager and CriptoGemas CEO
Hello guys, congratulations to the team after first round completed, huge success. Lets see the next round!!
Just a reminder, we still have the airdrop on going, around 160 slots available for KEP tokens.
Good luck to everyone.
full member
Activity: 686
Merit: 100
what will happen to the unsold tokens if there will be any?

i dont know, i hope they will be bunrned or back to the investors?

I have seen some projects giving away free unsold tokens to the investors but I feel it's wrong because they already have a stash of coins. Unsold tokens should always be burnt so that the present token value will be increased.

Depends on how many tokens you have sold, if you sell 10% of the tokens I don't think that that's always a good idea to burn them, you'll have liquidity's problems
I guess that if everything goes well in the ICO they should burn the unsold tokens.
You are right. If you are launching an ICO you have to burn the unsold tokens at the end. THat's an unwritten rule in the crypto space.

Yeah, a written rule or a consensus among members would nice with regards on what to do with unsold tokens, but I think we have to keep all options open an decide what will be the best for the community.

Community participation in this type of decision may give Kepler even more credibility, each has a different point of view, but in my opinion the burning of tokens can give a rapid growth to its investors, but to the wise long-term investors , bring greater profits if we receive dividends
sr. member
Activity: 658
Merit: 250
what will happen to the unsold tokens if there will be any?

i dont know, i hope they will be bunrned or back to the investors?

I have seen some projects giving away free unsold tokens to the investors but I feel it's wrong because they already have a stash of coins. Unsold tokens should always be burnt so that the present token value will be increased.

Depends on how many tokens you have sold, if you sell 10% of the tokens I don't think that that's always a good idea to burn them, you'll have liquidity's problems
In my opinion , about the liquidity, it can be solved by being listed on a good exchange which can give it a decent volume.
member
Activity: 182
Merit: 11
Altair VR. Next-gen Blockchain VR Wikipedia
what will happen to the unsold tokens if there will be any?

i dont know, i hope they will be bunrned or back to the investors?

I have seen some projects giving away free unsold tokens to the investors but I feel it's wrong because they already have a stash of coins. Unsold tokens should always be burnt so that the present token value will be increased.

Depends on how many tokens you have sold, if you sell 10% of the tokens I don't think that that's always a good idea to burn them, you'll have liquidity's problems
I guess that if everything goes well in the ICO they should burn the unsold tokens.
You are right. If you are launching an ICO you have to burn the unsold tokens at the end. THat's an unwritten rule in the crypto space.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
what will happen to the unsold tokens if there will be any?

i dont know, i hope they will be bunrned or back to the investors?

I have seen some projects giving away free unsold tokens to the investors but I feel it's wrong because they already have a stash of coins. Unsold tokens should always be burnt so that the present token value will be increased.

Depends on how many tokens you have sold, if you sell 10% of the tokens I don't think that that's always a good idea to burn them, you'll have liquidity's problems
I guess that if everything goes well in the ICO they should burn the unsold tokens.
member
Activity: 532
Merit: 50
ONe Social Network.
what will happen to the unsold tokens if there will be any?

i dont know, i hope they will be bunrned or back to the investors?

I have seen some projects giving away free unsold tokens to the investors but I feel it's wrong because they already have a stash of coins. Unsold tokens should always be burnt so that the present token value will be increased.

Depends on how many tokens you have sold, if you sell 10% of the tokens I don't think that that's always a good idea to burn them, you'll have liquidity's problems
sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 263
Kepler very good project! I didn't vstechat project of this sort in cryptography yet! It is worth observing as the project develops!!

If you have time to read the details, you will be amazed more. like they have the land already, like they overachieved in their first sale, like they have private investors to back up the project. so yes you are right, kepler is a very good project.

and the best thing there are still tokens to get

Smiley there are a lot of tokens still available.. the project just started but it seems to be running fine.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Kepler very good project! I didn't vstechat project of this sort in cryptography yet! It is worth observing as the project develops!!

If you have time to read the details, you will be amazed more. like they have the land already, like they overachieved in their first sale, like they have private investors to back up the project. so yes you are right, kepler is a very good project.

and the best thing there are still tokens to get
sr. member
Activity: 798
Merit: 250
CurioInvest [IEO Live]
Kepler very good project! I didn't vstechat project of this sort in cryptography yet! It is worth observing as the project develops!!

If you have time to read the details, you will be amazed more. like they have the land already, like they overachieved in their first sale, like they have private investors to back up the project. so yes you are right, kepler is a very good project.
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
what will happen to the unsold tokens if there will be any?

i dont know, i hope they will be bunrned or back to the investors?

I have seen some projects giving away free unsold tokens to the investors but I feel it's wrong because they already have a stash of coins. Unsold tokens should always be burnt so that the present token value will be increased.
burned would be the best, thats right. But Back to the investor is also better than withholding those.

Burning tokens is the most fairest way imo... every investor and the team itself see the price rise of their tokens/coins.
full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 100
Kepler very good project! I didn't vstechat project of this sort in cryptography yet! It is worth observing as the project develops!!
sr. member
Activity: 798
Merit: 250
CurioInvest [IEO Live]
what will happen to the unsold tokens if there will be any?

i dont know, i hope they will be bunrned or back to the investors?

I have seen some projects giving away free unsold tokens to the investors but I feel it's wrong because they already have a stash of coins. Unsold tokens should always be burnt so that the present token value will be increased.
burned would be the best, thats right. But Back to the investor is also better than withholding those.

I m with the burning option too, decreasing the supply always raises more interest from the investors.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 131
what will happen to the unsold tokens if there will be any?

i dont know, i hope they will be bunrned or back to the investors?

I have seen some projects giving away free unsold tokens to the investors but I feel it's wrong because they already have a stash of coins. Unsold tokens should always be burnt so that the present token value will be increased.
burned would be the best, thats right. But Back to the investor is also better than withholding those.
full member
Activity: 686
Merit: 100
this project threatens to become the most powerful and promising in the first quarter of the new year.
With such an excellent idea and a strong and powerful team, you can easily take a hard cap. I will definitely take part in the bounty
I don't know if it's that easy to collect that much money. The market is really down at the moment although ICOs are very hyped at the moment.

thats what people said in the middle of September. just wanted to mention that

We will make some counter actions against the market dump

The market will bounce back by the time of ICO. I wouldn't worry too much about it.
That's your prediction? I want to believe it but can you tell me the facts that will lead to the rise again. The market strongly react to the news, are there any good ones recently or upcoming?

Not my prediction but my assessment. Crytospace and the ICOs have been due a pretty good housecleaning. We've seen scams, crazy pumps and dumps ( currency manipulation) and all that. I think with proper regulation, we could see good ICOs like this with real-life application of the blockchain technology take a life of its own. We should remember that technology is the key here. I bought in when it was when bitcoin was at $4000+ that even if at this point it's still a 100% profit. It will bounce back.

Really, many people have complained about the possibility of regulation, do not think exaggerated any form of control or combat fraud. Cryptospace needs to have its ways of identifying future problems and prevention. Project as Kepler will succeed is need recognition, should not be overshadowed by scandalous projects with no future

Sorry for coming in late. It is in the interest of everyone involved if we can work out mechanism to reduce fraud in this space. I believe KYC is among the first good step being taken towards that goal. We should be happy with the news of SEC Chairman seeking a softer approach towards crypto business. Hopefully, we will see some bounce after this first good news in a week of serious bad news after another.

The initial aggressiveness of the SEC, and all the restrictions imposed, were solely and exclusively to inhibit fraudulent attempts to absurdly exist in the world of cryptography. For projects of responsibility and character like Kepler, there are certainly no problems with the organs, even in time of possible adjustments
newbie
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
Very nice, i love project about Robotic. I'm in  Smiley
hero member
Activity: 2968
Merit: 605
what will happen to the unsold tokens if there will be any?

i dont know, i hope they will be bunrned or back to the investors?

I have seen some projects giving away free unsold tokens to the investors but I feel it's wrong because they already have a stash of coins. Unsold tokens should always be burnt so that the present token value will be increased.

yeah. according to the wp they will be saved:
All the coins left unsold after the ICO goes for saving until the further announcements
Additionally, the same number of reserved tokens as number of Tokens allocated into
savings account according to of NonSale Tokens will also be allocated into savings
account.

probably if you need more money then sell some leftovers or even holding them as reserve due to the coin is backed up by the real estate - so practically no one can overwhelm you legally if you still hold the majority.
so any unsold tokens will not be burned or distributed to investors but held for further future use, very well ...
full member
Activity: 1064
Merit: 166
Yes i also think like many people here that the cap is high. The soft cap is 30 million, it’s a huge amount, maybe developp AI and Robotics things are very expensive. We will see if the amount is reached and what the team can do with that.

I think they said earlier that it doesn't matter if they hit the mark or not because they have private investors on standby that will make up the difference. Must be nice to have a line of people waiting to give you couple hundred million bucks.

Could also be part of their strategy to make the project look even more interesting. I would like to see the cap not being reached in order for them to be forced to prove that there is in fact a group of private investors making up for the gap to $30 million dollars.

Why are they not activating private investors in any case? It looks like there are more conditions in the background otherwise they wouldnt say no to more initial capital.
I am sure they know what are they doing and would only make decisions to benefit their company.  

they were mentioning they don't want a huge investor to influence too much the direction of the project if i remember correctly
This is not only the desire of this project, it is the desire of almost all projects, because everyone is striving for independence and decentralization.


agree but this choice make everything much more difficult, hope the project can get the necessary fund one way or another
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
Yes i also think like many people here that the cap is high. The soft cap is 30 million, it’s a huge amount, maybe developp AI and Robotics things are very expensive. We will see if the amount is reached and what the team can do with that.

I think they said earlier that it doesn't matter if they hit the mark or not because they have private investors on standby that will make up the difference. Must be nice to have a line of people waiting to give you couple hundred million bucks.

Could also be part of their strategy to make the project look even more interesting. I would like to see the cap not being reached in order for them to be forced to prove that there is in fact a group of private investors making up for the gap to $30 million dollars.

Why are they not activating private investors in any case? It looks like there are more conditions in the background otherwise they wouldnt say no to more initial capital.
I am sure they know what are they doing and would only make decisions to benefit their company. 

they were mentioning they don't want a huge investor to influence too much the direction of the project if i remember correctly
This is not only the desire of this project, it is the desire of almost all projects, because everyone is striving for independence and decentralization.

That's a normal move. Having a huge investor means giving him a lot of the control of the project. And that is something that the developers do not usually like it.
Jump to: