Topic: Scammer Tag: Gineta - page 2. (Read 4922 times)

Dude,

I don't know you so forgive me for busing your balls.

You may be stupid, you may be a drunk, or maybe you are just crazy.  But that doesn't  make you a scammer.


http://www.aa.org/lang/sp/subpage.cfm

Mods can we delete or lock this thread??

And Gineta,  I suggest you lay off the Cerveza's.

(or at least don't bitcoin/chat/post while drunk)

augustocroppo ??

I don't know Gineta and I can't really understand what he's trying to say.  I have no problem doxing a scammer and applying any LEGAL pressure to attempt recovery, however I do find this thread troubling.

Yeah I understand. (Sorta)



Try Google Translate or another translating program.... It might help make things more clear when posting on the forum and IRC!

lol yeah.. Must be the language barrier

So the poor guy is who he says he is? Using an alias to make it easier for us white people

So the poor guy is who he says he is? Using an alias to make it easier for us white people

gineta

You shouldn't be asked to make your identity public.  As far as I know you did not scam anyone.  So there is no need to request a scammer tag.  However the concern is that your requests/inquiries on IRC were "suspect."

If you are legitimate try to make a few honest trades to build credibility.  If you are not legitimate or you reputation here is beyond repair you may want to try another forum.

Also it seems your not a native english speaker (Spanish??).  Maybe you could find someone who speaks you language to help you out.  Augusto, I don't know why, but I think you may speak spanish.  Maybe you could converse in Spanish with him.

(psy what do you guys speak over there?? are you in spain or portugel?)


As I understand it the Scam Accusations thread it used AFTER a buyer/seller/borrower does not hold up their end of the deal.  This is a public form to bring the accusation, provide proof and for the accused to answer or to pay back.

Also this occurred on IRC.  Doesn't IRC have a WOT  (web of trust) to address this situation?

Just asking for a little clarity.  Cause right now this thread reminds me of Salem, MA circa 1692  or a recently uncovered Stassi file. 

Gineta does not have to prove any innocence because he is not guilty of any offense. Do you see a scammer tag in Gineta's profile?

I am trying to determine how much consistent is your accusation. Your persistent refusal to provide the evidence necessary means you do not possess the document alleged. I am sorry for you, but I am sure a scammer tag will be not issued for Gineta. Your allegations are not based on reliable evidence.

1. All the information gained was obtained from public domain. Ergo, if you do not secure your information which is then collated then that is a issue with the sites, not here. The ICO would maybe take a stance against companies like Facebook, Companies House, 192.com etc.

The information does not constitute a breach of the Data Protection Act, as it was all gathered from the public domain. Unlawfully obtaining information pertains to computer hacking or data breach. The information was obtained in a lawful internet search, by both myself and AugustoCroppo.

2. I have never refuted where I live. In fact most of my information can be gained from a simple who.is as I own several domains and do freelance design. Simply putting Kelticfox in Google results in a lot of information about me. Congratulations on using Google. If you wish to email me directly, you can do so by emailing jay(at)kelticfox(dot)co(dot)uk.

3. Augusto, as you've seem to want to muddy the water.... I have already stated I will not put Gineta's ID on here. Gineta can do so to prove his innocence should he so wish.

4. Gineta, I haven't responded to your email, because it basically states "Unless you drop the scam accusation, I will report you to the ICO.". I don't respond to attempted blackmail.

5. Gineta, you STILL haven't responded to the information. This is another tactic at being evasive.

Isn't it just Northampton dialect?