Pages:
Author

Topic: SCGuild - SolidCoin Fork of BTC Guild - page 2. (Read 5488 times)

full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
September 04, 2011, 01:17:00 AM
#44
There was an error processing your payout. Please try again.

I just did a payout with no issue. -- Check to make sure you have a valid payout address.

Cheers,
Kermee
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
September 04, 2011, 01:07:03 AM
#43
There was an error processing your payout. Please try again.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
September 02, 2011, 10:19:33 PM
#42
Best... solved block... EVAH!

Cheers,
Kermee

P.S. No. It wasn't me.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
September 02, 2011, 01:23:58 AM
#41
Regarding rejected shares:  This morning I updated to the most recent solidcoind for 64-bit linux.  If the stale rates are still high, there's nothing more I can do about it.  It's using a mostly stock pushpool configuration, but it was receiving a lot of duplicate work from solidcoind itself.
Still way high. Something is wrong with your SC pool. Overloaded?

It's a problem in solidcoind, not pushpool, the database, or the servers.  I've used two different pre-compiled binaries from the website, and also compiling it straight from the source.  The only thing left I can think of is seeing how easily I can implement JoelKatz's patches into solidcoind.

It's PushPool. Wink  PoolServerJ would probably eliminate most of the stales/rejects to an acceptable level.

Cheers,
Kermee
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
September 01, 2011, 06:24:40 PM
#40
Regarding rejected shares:  This morning I updated to the most recent solidcoind for 64-bit linux.  If the stale rates are still high, there's nothing more I can do about it.  It's using a mostly stock pushpool configuration, but it was receiving a lot of duplicate work from solidcoind itself.
Still way high. Something is wrong with your SC pool. Overloaded?

It's a problem in solidcoind, not pushpool, the database, or the servers.  I've used two different pre-compiled binaries from the website, and also compiling it straight from the source.  The only thing left I can think of is seeing how easily I can implement JoelKatz's patches into solidcoind.
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
September 01, 2011, 04:51:47 PM
#39
Regarding rejected shares:  This morning I updated to the most recent solidcoind for 64-bit linux.  If the stale rates are still high, there's nothing more I can do about it.  It's using a mostly stock pushpool configuration, but it was receiving a lot of duplicate work from solidcoind itself.
Still way high. Something is wrong with your SC pool. Overloaded?
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1491
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
September 01, 2011, 04:00:35 PM
#38
I'm done dealing with forkcoins until one of them can prove itself as having any practical use outside of screwing up the hash rates of the BTC network.

Cry more? lol Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 362
Merit: 250
September 01, 2011, 04:00:27 PM
#37
Gotcha, it's not really a problem.

I0C is actually doing well without your big pool in the way lol no offense(BTC Guild is my favorite pool anyway). For the last day or so it has remained more profitable than solidcoin but I don't think many people are noticing. The fluctuating low difficulty and 120 block adjust is nice.

These alt currency's pulling bitcoin difficulty down is exciting. They have basically stretched out bitcoin's profitability. Also, being profitable consistently for 2016 blocks has its advantages. Since solidcoin and others change difficulty so fast they will always have wild fluctuations in hash rate.
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
September 01, 2011, 03:41:31 PM
#36
SC Guild is just going to run its course.  No new features are going to be added/copied from the main BTC Guild frontend.  I'm done dealing with forkcoins until one of them can prove itself as having any practical use outside of screwing up the hash rates of the BTC network.

Since this isn't I0C which actually stopped working, I have no plans of shutting off SC Guild as long as it can produce $25/mo to cover the two pool servers [and I'd just shut off one pool server rather than the whole SC Guild until it fails to produce $15/mo].


Regarding rejected shares:  This morning I updated to the most recent solidcoind for 64-bit linux.  If the stale rates are still high, there's nothing more I can do about it.  It's using a mostly stock pushpool configuration, but it was receiving a lot of duplicate work from solidcoind itself.
sr. member
Activity: 362
Merit: 250
September 01, 2011, 03:34:53 PM
#35
Can you add donation so we don't have to wait for the 120 confirms?
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
September 01, 2011, 01:56:26 PM
#34
Is anyone else getting high stale rates??

Totals   2,600.84 MH/s   5768 (727, 11.19%)
Yes, this concerns me. I'm still getting very high stales.

I am too, but it is still more profitable....for now.
Totals   5,836.38 MH/s   32123 (4020, 11.12%)
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
September 01, 2011, 11:50:30 AM
#33
Too many stales. CYA.
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
August 31, 2011, 03:36:06 AM
#32
Is anyone else getting high stale rates??

Totals   2,600.84 MH/s   5768 (727, 11.19%)
Yes, this concerns me. I'm still getting very high stales.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 564
August 27, 2011, 05:23:47 PM
#31
By the way, I eventually managed to get the site to send me a password reset e-mail and reset my password... but I had to edit the URL in the e-mail because it sent me to the main BTCGuild site rather than SCGuild.

Edit: Also, glad to hear the reset stats button will be making an appearance. I'm testing pointing my slow FPGA miner (now with long polling!) at SC Guild and it would've come in handy, though I guess I could've created a new worker...
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
August 27, 2011, 05:05:07 PM
#30
A second server has been added to SC Guild to assist with the load.  Miners do not have to change any of their settings.  You may see a few more rejects than usual once your client recognizes the new DNS settings, at which point reject rates should be reduced a little.  A third server is being added to the cluster as soon as the ISP provisions the extra server clusters for SC and BTC Guild.

"Since Reset" stats will be added back to SC Guild this weekend, since SolidCoin is showing enough staying power to warrant a few extra features/stats.
sr. member
Activity: 464
Merit: 250
August 27, 2011, 02:31:05 AM
#29
with my hashrate, bitcoin calculator shows that i should mine with current diff 313 SC, but SC Guild estimated 24 Hour rewards is 84.75665258

how is that possible ?

if that's true, mining SC isn't much profitable than mining BTC

SC does not have a estimated rewards. they have a 24 Hour Rewards   (rewards that you got in the last full 24).

full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
August 27, 2011, 02:17:06 AM
#28
SC Guild estimated 24 Hour rewards is 84.75665258

Where is SC Guild providing that info on the website?

Cheers,
Kermee
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
August 27, 2011, 01:26:04 AM
#27
with my hashrate, bitcoin calculator shows that i should mine with current diff 313 SC, but SC Guild estimated 24 Hour rewards is 84.75665258

how is that possible ?

if that's true, mining SC isn't much profitable than mining BTC
What is your hashrate? When did you start mining?  SC mining is 2.5 times more profitable than BTC for me.  Should be the same for you.
newbie
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
August 27, 2011, 01:15:07 AM
#26
with my hashrate, bitcoin calculator shows that i should mine with current diff 313 SC, but SC Guild estimated 24 Hour rewards is 84.75665258

how is that possible ?

if that's true, mining SC isn't much profitable than mining BTC
full member
Activity: 180
Merit: 100
August 26, 2011, 07:14:23 PM
#25
Any chance of getting a reset worker stats button?
Pages:
Jump to: