📡SCIENTIFICCOIN - BlockShow Oscar Winner🎓+ Invest in scientific discoveries 👓 - page 95.

Jepli

member

Activity: 315

Merit: 10

Quote from: wissy on August 15, 2018, 05:44:04 AM

Quote from: kickstarter on August 15, 2018, 04:39:18 AM

A phenomenal project
With that being said, aren't you guys afraid that there's not that big of interest in Education and Science? I mean, people care more about social media and sneakers these days. Is this going to be profitable at all, in your estimation?

You are right but on the other hand, there are plenty of projects which focus on those popular things like social media and the market spreads throughout all of them. Scientificcoin on the other hand is on of the few who focus on the field of science.

I would like to think that this project will be of great help to scientists and innovators in realizing their projects and ideas especially on those innovations that will greatly influence our daily lives.

wissy

full member

Activity: 658

Merit: 102

Quote from: kickstarter on August 15, 2018, 04:39:18 AM

A phenomenal project
With that being said, aren't you guys afraid that there's not that big of interest in Education and Science? I mean, people care more about social media and sneakers these days. Is this going to be profitable at all, in your estimation?

You are right but on the other hand, there are plenty of projects which focus on those popular things like social media and the market spreads throughout all of them. Scientificcoin on the other hand is on of the few who focus on the field of science.

kickstarter

full member

Activity: 420

Merit: 105

A phenomenal project
With that being said, aren't you guys afraid that there's not that big of interest in Education and Science? I mean, people care more about social media and sneakers these days. Is this going to be profitable at all, in your estimation?

king_of_alts

member

Activity: 476

Merit: 10

Quote from: cyberspacemonkey on August 15, 2018, 02:38:49 AM

Quote from: jonnytracker on August 15, 2018, 01:17:12 AM

Quote from: cyberspacemonkey on August 15, 2018, 01:13:01 AM

The whitepaper is very vague and I don't understand that it keeps mentioning some "mathematical algorithm", isn't it supposed to be an ERC20 token? And I mean if an algorithm is not mathematical then what else can it be?

The chances of not being real is high in a project that relies on erc20 , why not own block chain since its a scientist coin ? Smart contracts and stuff in your own blockchain

I know right, at least a cloned code with an existing algo but not even that. Too many red flags on this to say the least.

They use ERC20 during the ICO. Later there will be a dedicated blockchain. It is much easier to do a crowd sale on Ethereum than on your own chain.

cyberspacemonkey

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1002

Quote from: jonnytracker on August 15, 2018, 01:17:12 AM

Quote from: cyberspacemonkey on August 15, 2018, 01:13:01 AM

The whitepaper is very vague and I don't understand that it keeps mentioning some "mathematical algorithm", isn't it supposed to be an ERC20 token? And I mean if an algorithm is not mathematical then what else can it be?

The chances of not being real is high in a project that relies on erc20 , why not own block chain since its a scientist coin ? Smart contracts and stuff in your own blockchain

I know right, at least a cloned code with an existing algo but not even that. Too many red flags on this to say the least.

jonnytracker

sr. member

Activity: 672

Merit: 261

Quote from: cyberspacemonkey on August 15, 2018, 01:13:01 AM

The whitepaper is very vague and I don't understand that it keeps mentioning some "mathematical algorithm", isn't it supposed to be an ERC20 token? And I mean if an algorithm is not mathematical then what else can it be?

The chances of not being real is high in a project that relies on erc20 , why not own block chain since its a scientist coin ? Smart contracts and stuff in your own blockchain

cyberspacemonkey

legendary

Activity: 1288

Merit: 1002

The whitepaper is very vague and I don't understand that it keeps mentioning some "mathematical algorithm", isn't it supposed to be an ERC20 token? And I mean if an algorithm is not mathematical then what else can it be?

Altcoinrusher

full member

Activity: 616

Merit: 100

In this bearish market trend, only projects that are viable and has a good use case will have better chance of surviving and crypto adaptors knows that. And I believe that SCIENTIFICCOIN will have its place in crypto verse soon.

belechau

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 100

Quote from: bitcoin-shark on August 14, 2018, 04:00:09 PM

Quote from: dzonikg28 on August 14, 2018, 11:27:39 AM

Quote from: maurobiasolo on August 14, 2018, 11:24:25 AM

Quote from: Jay2408 on August 14, 2018, 09:48:06 AM

Quote from: number37 on August 14, 2018, 08:03:39 AM

In this case, the team decided to attract several large investments, which is a more realistic prospect than wasting time and money on advertising, following the example of numerous ISO projects. Let's see the result

I think it's a wise decision to approach only large investors considering that science projects aren't that attractive to most small investors and the tough times for crypto with a lot of recent ICOs not even reaching their softcap.

In our previous experience, we saw that small investors have problems to understand such complex projects. In addition, we don't promise something like 50X so, only people who can make a solid investment are interested

You should perhaps provide more details what you mean when you say that you are looking for solid investments only and not so much for small investments. Is that 10,000 $ or more or what is considered solid?

maybe it's true that for this kind of projects, big investors are needed, but in my opinion the team should not neglect even small investors, all the help is needed to launch a new project...

Exactly, I participated in projects where small purchases complemented and very well the whole, I hope they can enable the little ones this share of participation

bitcoin-shark

hero member

Activity: 2968

Merit: 605

Quote from: dzonikg28 on August 14, 2018, 11:27:39 AM

Quote from: maurobiasolo on August 14, 2018, 11:24:25 AM

Quote from: Jay2408 on August 14, 2018, 09:48:06 AM

Quote from: number37 on August 14, 2018, 08:03:39 AM

In this case, the team decided to attract several large investments, which is a more realistic prospect than wasting time and money on advertising, following the example of numerous ISO projects. Let's see the result

I think it's a wise decision to approach only large investors considering that science projects aren't that attractive to most small investors and the tough times for crypto with a lot of recent ICOs not even reaching their softcap.

In our previous experience, we saw that small investors have problems to understand such complex projects. In addition, we don't promise something like 50X so, only people who can make a solid investment are interested

You should perhaps provide more details what you mean when you say that you are looking for solid investments only and not so much for small investments. Is that 10,000 $ or more or what is considered solid?

maybe it's true that for this kind of projects, big investors are needed, but in my opinion the team should not neglect even small investors, all the help is needed to launch a new project...

maurobiasolo

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 101

http://scientificcoin.com/

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: sge99 on August 14, 2018, 02:57:18 PM

Quote from: maurobiasolo on August 14, 2018, 01:04:20 PM

Quote from: dzonikg28 on August 14, 2018, 11:27:39 AM

Quote from: maurobiasolo on August 14, 2018, 11:24:25 AM

Quote from: Jay2408 on August 14, 2018, 09:48:06 AM

Quote from: number37 on August 14, 2018, 08:03:39 AM

In this case, the team decided to attract several large investments, which is a more realistic prospect than wasting time and money on advertising, following the example of numerous ISO projects. Let's see the result

I think it's a wise decision to approach only large investors considering that science projects aren't that attractive to most small investors and the tough times for crypto with a lot of recent ICOs not even reaching their softcap.

In our previous experience, we saw that small investors have problems to understand such complex projects. In addition, we don't promise something like 50X so, only people who can make a solid investment are interested

You should perhaps provide more details what you mean when you say that you are looking for solid investments only and not so much for small investments. Is that 10,000 $ or more or what is considered solid?

Hi, we are looking for someone who can invest a sum expecting a return over the medium term (so no lambo, land an exchange and get 10x, etc).
The sum itself doesn't make an investment solid: it's the investors' perspective. Typically, in crypto, small ICO contributors look for an immediate return.

This seems to me a realistic evaluation both of your project and the crypto people's expectation

. I appreciate your aim to put the project on a sound basis.

If I'm not mistaken, the team are inclined to find investors who are into medium term returns and not for quick bucks. This is really the case right now, ROI tends to be in medium term on most projects and that is quite true.

yes, no reason to promise amazing quick returns when the market is so bearish (and it's hard to predict when it will turn bullish)

sge99

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 10

Quote from: maurobiasolo on August 14, 2018, 01:04:20 PM

Quote from: dzonikg28 on August 14, 2018, 11:27:39 AM

Quote from: maurobiasolo on August 14, 2018, 11:24:25 AM

Quote from: Jay2408 on August 14, 2018, 09:48:06 AM

Quote from: number37 on August 14, 2018, 08:03:39 AM

In this case, the team decided to attract several large investments, which is a more realistic prospect than wasting time and money on advertising, following the example of numerous ISO projects. Let's see the result

I think it's a wise decision to approach only large investors considering that science projects aren't that attractive to most small investors and the tough times for crypto with a lot of recent ICOs not even reaching their softcap.

In our previous experience, we saw that small investors have problems to understand such complex projects. In addition, we don't promise something like 50X so, only people who can make a solid investment are interested

You should perhaps provide more details what you mean when you say that you are looking for solid investments only and not so much for small investments. Is that 10,000 $ or more or what is considered solid?

Hi, we are looking for someone who can invest a sum expecting a return over the medium term (so no lambo, land an exchange and get 10x, etc).
The sum itself doesn't make an investment solid: it's the investors' perspective. Typically, in crypto, small ICO contributors look for an immediate return.

This seems to me a realistic evaluation both of your project and the crypto people's expectation

. I appreciate your aim to put the project on a sound basis.

ParRus

full member

Activity: 490

Merit: 104

Quote from: dzonikg28 on August 14, 2018, 11:27:39 AM

Quote from: maurobiasolo on August 14, 2018, 11:24:25 AM

Quote from: Jay2408 on August 14, 2018, 09:48:06 AM

Quote from: number37 on August 14, 2018, 08:03:39 AM

In this case, the team decided to attract several large investments, which is a more realistic prospect than wasting time and money on advertising, following the example of numerous ISO projects. Let's see the result

I think it's a wise decision to approach only large investors considering that science projects aren't that attractive to most small investors and the tough times for crypto with a lot of recent ICOs not even reaching their softcap.

In our previous experience, we saw that small investors have problems to understand such complex projects. In addition, we don't promise something like 50X so, only people who can make a solid investment are interested

You should perhaps provide more details what you mean when you say that you are looking for solid investments only and not so much for small investments. Is that 10,000 $ or more or what is considered solid?

Is there will be the opportunity to invest with fiat money during ICO? I think that for project team would be better to think how attract large investors not from cryptoworld at this time.

aveon

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 10

Quote from: niklasmato on August 14, 2018, 02:10:23 PM

Quote from: maurobiasolo on August 14, 2018, 01:05:41 PM

Quote from: Frank37 on August 14, 2018, 11:37:25 AM

Quote from: maurobiasolo on August 14, 2018, 11:24:25 AM

Quote from: Jay2408 on August 14, 2018, 09:48:06 AM

Quote from: number37 on August 14, 2018, 08:03:39 AM

In this case, the team decided to attract several large investments, which is a more realistic prospect than wasting time and money on advertising, following the example of numerous ISO projects. Let's see the result

I think it's a wise decision to approach only large investors considering that science projects aren't that attractive to most small investors and the tough times for crypto with a lot of recent ICOs not even reaching their softcap.

In our previous experience, we saw that small investors have problems to understand such complex projects. In addition, we don't promise something like 50X so, only people who can make a solid investment are interested

Nowadays it is more 50/ insted 50x.

Yes

And this is an additional issue: people are hodling hoping for a bounce back (that, in many cases, will never happen).

Well some project will become very big just like in the internet days we had amazon, google, microsoft and apple, but tons of them will cease to excist in the very very near future.

They are disappearing right now. Many projects I have participated in have like -5-10Xs, so it's useless to hold their tokens for any longer...

niklasmato

sr. member

Activity: 616

Merit: 263

Quote from: maurobiasolo on August 14, 2018, 01:05:41 PM

Quote from: Frank37 on August 14, 2018, 11:37:25 AM

Quote from: maurobiasolo on August 14, 2018, 11:24:25 AM

Quote from: Jay2408 on August 14, 2018, 09:48:06 AM

Quote from: number37 on August 14, 2018, 08:03:39 AM

In this case, the team decided to attract several large investments, which is a more realistic prospect than wasting time and money on advertising, following the example of numerous ISO projects. Let's see the result

I think it's a wise decision to approach only large investors considering that science projects aren't that attractive to most small investors and the tough times for crypto with a lot of recent ICOs not even reaching their softcap.

In our previous experience, we saw that small investors have problems to understand such complex projects. In addition, we don't promise something like 50X so, only people who can make a solid investment are interested

Nowadays it is more 50/ insted 50x.

Yes

And this is an additional issue: people are hodling hoping for a bounce back (that, in many cases, will never happen).

Well some project will become very big just like in the internet days we had amazon, google, microsoft and apple, but tons of them will cease to excist in the very very near future.

maurobiasolo

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 101

http://scientificcoin.com/

Quote from: Frank37 on August 14, 2018, 11:37:25 AM

Quote from: maurobiasolo on August 14, 2018, 11:24:25 AM

Quote from: Jay2408 on August 14, 2018, 09:48:06 AM

Quote from: number37 on August 14, 2018, 08:03:39 AM

In this case, the team decided to attract several large investments, which is a more realistic prospect than wasting time and money on advertising, following the example of numerous ISO projects. Let's see the result

I think it's a wise decision to approach only large investors considering that science projects aren't that attractive to most small investors and the tough times for crypto with a lot of recent ICOs not even reaching their softcap.

In our previous experience, we saw that small investors have problems to understand such complex projects. In addition, we don't promise something like 50X so, only people who can make a solid investment are interested

Nowadays it is more 50/ insted 50x.

Yes

And this is an additional issue: people are hodling hoping for a bounce back (that, in many cases, will never happen).

maurobiasolo

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 101

http://scientificcoin.com/

Quote from: dzonikg28 on August 14, 2018, 11:27:39 AM

Quote from: maurobiasolo on August 14, 2018, 11:24:25 AM

Quote from: Jay2408 on August 14, 2018, 09:48:06 AM

Quote from: number37 on August 14, 2018, 08:03:39 AM

In this case, the team decided to attract several large investments, which is a more realistic prospect than wasting time and money on advertising, following the example of numerous ISO projects. Let's see the result

I think it's a wise decision to approach only large investors considering that science projects aren't that attractive to most small investors and the tough times for crypto with a lot of recent ICOs not even reaching their softcap.

In our previous experience, we saw that small investors have problems to understand such complex projects. In addition, we don't promise something like 50X so, only people who can make a solid investment are interested

You should perhaps provide more details what you mean when you say that you are looking for solid investments only and not so much for small investments. Is that 10,000 $ or more or what is considered solid?

Hi, we are looking for someone who can invest a sum expecting a return over the medium term (so no lambo, land an exchange and get 10x, etc).
The sum itself doesn't make an investment solid: it's the investors' perspective. Typically, in crypto, small ICO contributors look for an immediate return.

king_of_alts

member

Activity: 476

Merit: 10

Quote from: Frank37 on August 14, 2018, 11:37:25 AM

Quote from: maurobiasolo on August 14, 2018, 11:24:25 AM

Quote from: Jay2408 on August 14, 2018, 09:48:06 AM

Quote from: number37 on August 14, 2018, 08:03:39 AM

In this case, the team decided to attract several large investments, which is a more realistic prospect than wasting time and money on advertising, following the example of numerous ISO projects. Let's see the result

I think it's a wise decision to approach only large investors considering that science projects aren't that attractive to most small investors and the tough times for crypto with a lot of recent ICOs not even reaching their softcap.

In our previous experience, we saw that small investors have problems to understand such complex projects. In addition, we don't promise something like 50X so, only people who can make a solid investment are interested

Nowadays it is more 50/ insted 50x.

that's true but at some point the market will reach its bottom and then ICOs won't trade for a fraction of their price anymore. When that will be, I don't know. Cheesy

Frank37

sr. member

Activity: 770

Merit: 250

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: maurobiasolo on August 14, 2018, 11:24:25 AM

Quote from: Jay2408 on August 14, 2018, 09:48:06 AM

Quote from: number37 on August 14, 2018, 08:03:39 AM

In this case, the team decided to attract several large investments, which is a more realistic prospect than wasting time and money on advertising, following the example of numerous ISO projects. Let's see the result

I think it's a wise decision to approach only large investors considering that science projects aren't that attractive to most small investors and the tough times for crypto with a lot of recent ICOs not even reaching their softcap.

In our previous experience, we saw that small investors have problems to understand such complex projects. In addition, we don't promise something like 50X so, only people who can make a solid investment are interested

Nowadays it is more 50/ insted 50x.

dzonikg28

hero member

Activity: 1106

Merit: 508

Bisq Market Day - March 20th 2023

Quote from: maurobiasolo on August 14, 2018, 11:24:25 AM

Quote from: Jay2408 on August 14, 2018, 09:48:06 AM

Quote from: number37 on August 14, 2018, 08:03:39 AM

In this case, the team decided to attract several large investments, which is a more realistic prospect than wasting time and money on advertising, following the example of numerous ISO projects. Let's see the result

I think it's a wise decision to approach only large investors considering that science projects aren't that attractive to most small investors and the tough times for crypto with a lot of recent ICOs not even reaching their softcap.

In our previous experience, we saw that small investors have problems to understand such complex projects. In addition, we don't promise something like 50X so, only people who can make a solid investment are interested

You should perhaps provide more details what you mean when you say that you are looking for solid investments only and not so much for small investments. Is that 10,000 $ or more or what is considered solid?

Topic: 📡SCIENTIFICCOIN - BlockShow Oscar Winner🎓+ Invest in scientific discoveries 👓 - page 95. (Read 65855 times)