Pages:
Author

Topic: Scrap the trolling rule? - page 3. (Read 825 times)

legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1166
🤩Finally Married🤩
February 27, 2020, 10:01:27 AM
#6
Just voted for the 3rd one? (Reason: Just Trolling ✌😂)

This is an example of troll... ☝️

Also the quoted message is considered as a troll or maybe not, really... when you try to look at it hardly with four eyes, you'll see that this message was just meant to give his own grudge or maybe his ideals which is basically a sentiment. But if the quoted message wasn't suppose to be there because it was merely a retaliation then it should be removed.

if someone didn't get my point,... don't worry I didn't get it either. Perhaps I should, maybe, find my point somewhere else... LoL
copper member
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1901
Amazon Prime Member #7
February 27, 2020, 09:51:57 AM
#5
Trolling is not something that you disagree with. Nor is it something that is critical of someone you like. Trolling will generally be more than a single post.

I don’t agree with what he said, but he has the right to be critical of forum members, even if he does so in a way that is in very bad taste.

This is probably a great opportunity to practice having someone disagree with you and to practice a factual rebuttal to what someone who disagrees with you in an attempt to change their opinion.
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
February 27, 2020, 09:44:20 AM
#4
I really don't care much about the bad report itself. If anything it's good news for me personally as I'm known to engage in trolly debates sometimes.

I know Bitcointalk has a much more... uhm... liberal definition of trolling than most other places so I'm interested what others think - if that post crossed the line here or not.

There’s nothing constructive about the post, its purpose is just to troll & the bit about Zepher is out of order imo.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
February 27, 2020, 09:29:50 AM
#3
I really don't care much about the bad report itself. If anything it's good news for me personally as I'm known to engage in trolly debates sometimes.

I know Bitcointalk has a much more... uhm... liberal definition of trolling than most other places so I'm interested what others think - if that post crossed the line here or not.
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
February 27, 2020, 09:21:08 AM
#2
I think that post could definitely be seen as trolling. For a start it’s been made with an alt, throw away account. Speaking ill of the dead is definitely trolling, if I was a mod I’d defo have marked the report as Good.

I don’t think we should do away with the trolling rule tbh, suchmoon. This report obviously (wrongly imo) was marked as Bad but if we get rid of the trolling rule things would get a lot worse. Ass hats like cryptohunter would have free reign & be able to destroy this place.

Try not to get too disappointed about Bad reports, it’s better to keep reporting perceived trolling even if they don’t all get removed. Something is better than nothing. Keep up your great work, suchmoon.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
February 27, 2020, 09:14:50 AM
#1
This post:

in 5 years you have done nothing.  you have not added a single line of code to a single crypto project, and have not worked for a single blockchain startup
you remind me of zepher, did actually NOTHING for BTC, and like zepher, 6 months after your dead, people will forget all about you
oh, you worked for rollin.io, so you helped degenerates waste their money, woot?   all you HAVE done is extract $$$ for your own means from this scene, congrats?

LOL maybe in the next 5 years you will actually contribute to the technology that brings us all here....

Seemed like a good test for the trolling rule:

3. No trolling.

So I reported it as "100% trolling". It was marked as bad. Granted I could have added more info as to why I think it's trolling (attack on the OP, attack on a deceased forum member, false statements - 100% inflammatory content).

Is it trolling? If not - why? If yes - do posts like that have a chance of being removed (with a better report comment perhaps) or should we not bother?
Pages:
Jump to: