Pages:
Author

Topic: Scrypt Bitcoin Threads NOT Allowed - page 3. (Read 12739 times)

legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
October 11, 2013, 11:28:44 PM
oh u mean forum btc bagholders. not a fan of btc scrypt and not trollin (this time) but do feel its pretty bad taste to pick and chose what scamcoins you allow threads on or don't.

If you haven't noticed, theres at least 100 Alt coins I don't actively support, but I don't feel the need to disallow them. What we feel the need to disallow is a coin that can essentially be considered malware. The BITCOIN forums don't want immitators confusing/harming their BITCOIN users. That is the main priority. Its really not up for negotiation, the threads will be removed for the reasons that I have gone to lengths to explain already. Yep, censorship is bad, but necessary from time to time. I don't see anyone complaining when someone posts fake wallet stealer clients and I remove those.

If there is something you don't understand in my explanation, feel free to pm me with your questions, and I'll clarify.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1012
Democracy is vulnerable to a 51% attack.
October 11, 2013, 11:18:09 PM
not a fan of btc scrypt and not trollin (this time) but do feel its pretty bad taste to pick and chose what scamcoins you allow threads on or don't.
You oppose the use of judgment?
when its poor judgment yes
So are you saying that only topicality should be enforced and anything that's actually about an alternative cryptocurrency should be allowed? If so, I think I agree with you.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
October 11, 2013, 10:28:56 PM
not a fan of btc scrypt and not trollin (this time) but do feel its pretty bad taste to pick and chose what scamcoins you allow threads on or don't.
You oppose the use of judgment?


when its poor judgment yes
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1012
Democracy is vulnerable to a 51% attack.
October 11, 2013, 10:19:39 PM
not a fan of btc scrypt and not trollin (this time) but do feel its pretty bad taste to pick and chose what scamcoins you allow threads on or don't.
You oppose the use of judgment?
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
October 11, 2013, 10:18:00 PM
#99
So there has been a lot of uproar about the new Scrypt "Bitcoin". I have discussed it with the other Staff members, and we feel it is in the forum user's best interest to not allow topics about the Scrypt Bitcoin on Bitcointalk.

oh u mean forum btc bagholders. not a fan of btc scrypt and not trollin (this time) but do feel its pretty bad taste to pick and chose what scamcoins you allow threads on or don't.
member
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
October 11, 2013, 09:47:36 PM
#98
Bitcoin scrypt has faster transaction times though. Not been mentioned here yet :0) Some Alts will stick around. Keep mining this coin though, you won't regret it ;0)
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
October 07, 2013, 01:14:34 AM
#97
Unstickied, because the thread has been up long enough for people to see it. The rule still applies, however it doesn't need to be staring you in the face every time you come into the Alt Currencies section.
legendary
Activity: 1210
Merit: 1024
October 02, 2013, 12:10:46 PM
#96
^^^^^^^^^^^

Massively off topic.

The topic is Bitcoin Scrypt threads being disallowed.

I know you two are "Bitcoin Forum" regulars where there are no rules, but here in the Alt Forum...we're civilized LOL



~BCX~
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1012
Democracy is vulnerable to a 51% attack.
October 02, 2013, 10:39:03 AM
#95
no shit sherlock I just gave a 2 sec example of similar cause I cbf finding the various vids of Jed saying ripple is Bitcoin 2, and Chris has also stated the same....you always lose me how your brain works interpreting things however you see fit without thinking about what the person was infering.
I'm not saying you're wrong. I can't possibly know that Jed never said what you say he said. However, I never heard him say it, nor have I heard anyone else mention that he said it. I have seen reporters describe Ripple that way, and it would be easy to connect it to Jed, especially when articles intersperse that description with quotes from him.

You made a very specific claim. I suspect that claim is false.

Quote
(you've even privately infered I'm an idiot based on the penny not dropping for you on a number of things.....you suffer the smartest guy in the room syndrom when you are far from it on most accounts)
I can't find a single case where you and I discussed anything except for the "What if the government" thread, where you replied to me and I never replied to you -- mostly because I agreed with you. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2405639
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
October 02, 2013, 09:53:56 AM
#94
I'm not knocking on a coin for riding bitcoin's coat tail. I'm knocking a coin for deliberately attempting to create actual confusion in a way that's damaging to Bitcoin.

all of the above are opensource  Shocked..... get over it  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
October 02, 2013, 09:51:53 AM
#93
Where would u being, just watch any Jed or Chris early interview promotion of ripple, seen a few where its directly labelled by founders, inner circle as bitcoin 2, here's a 2 sec google and Chris dribbling about it being the second iteration of bitcoin  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yH4IqGaYpCU
First, that's Chris, not Jed. Second, "second iteration of bitcoin" is a description. "Bitcoin 2.0" is a name. There's a huge difference. Coke can say it's "an improvement on Pepsi" but if it says it's "Pepsi 2", that's a problem.

no shit sherlock I just gave a 2 sec example of similar cause I cbf finding the various vids of Jed saying ripple is Bitcoin 2, and Chris has also stated the same....you always lose me how your brain works interpreting things however you see fit without thinking about what the person was infering.

(you've even privately infered I'm an idiot based on the penny not dropping for you on a number of things.....you suffer the smartest guy in the room syndrom when you are far from it on most accounts)
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1012
Democracy is vulnerable to a 51% attack.
October 02, 2013, 09:30:56 AM
#92
Where would u being, just watch any Jed or Chris early interview promotion of ripple, seen a few where its directly labelled by founders, inner circle as bitcoin 2, here's a 2 sec google and Chris dribbling about it being the second iteration of bitcoin  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yH4IqGaYpCU
First, that's Chris, not Jed. Second, "second iteration of bitcoin" is a description. "Bitcoin 2.0" is a name. There's a huge difference. Coke can say it's "an improvement on Pepsi" but if it says it's "Pepsi 2", that's a problem.

And really that is a fair description. We started out with Bitcoin's design and source code. We looked at what we thought worked well and what we thought could be improved. That's how we built Ripple.

Quote
anyway I don't have the time to start an argument for no reason, just found it rich you knocking another coin for riding on bitoins coat tail when no matter how you paint it ripple itself did....hell look at the forum you gave the biggest giveaway on...go figure.
I'm not knocking on a coin for riding bitcoin's coat tail. I'm knocking a coin for deliberately attempting to create actual confusion in a way that's damaging to Bitcoin.

Quote
Not for a second am I saying such marketing is wrong or a bad idea....hell dumb not to promote any crypto/alt currency along the lines of bitcoin, one of the most widely recognised cryptos.
Right, but deliberately creating confusion that hurts Bitcoin and could cause people to lose money is a problem.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
October 02, 2013, 09:25:34 AM
#91
4) Putting "Bitcoin" in its name seems like a deliberate attempt to convey an official connection to Bitcoin that doesn't exist and is likely to create confusion. If its developers truly believed in it, they wouldn't do something so cynical and malicious as this.

lol this coming from an Opencoin employee with 20 billion XRP
If you think I have 20 billion XRP, you're off by a factor of about 10,000.

Quote
Jed originally constantly promoting ripple as bitcoin 2 to the uniformed and even stealing the name opencoin from a non profit credible bitcoin group just to gain some credibility for ripple
I never heard Jed do that. If you have a credible source, I'll believe you. But I never heard him do that, nor anyone else claim he did that. I have seen articles that ask rhetorically if Ripple is "Bitcoin 2.0", presumably to suggest that Ripple might replace Bitcoin. But, so far as I know, nobody is making any attempt to intentionally confuse Bitcoin and Ripple so that people think Ripple has some connection to Bitcoin that it doesn't have.

As for opencoin.org being a "bitcoin group", I'm pretty sure they're not. The OpenCoin.org folks have no connection to Bitcoin that I know of and the group became more or less inactive in 2009. And, frankly, the possibility of confusion with that group was one of the downsides to choosing 'OpenCoin' as a company name. Not because there's anything wrong with them, just because you want a name to be as unique as possible so you can choose what people associated it with. That's why names like "Amazon", "eBay", and "Microsoft" are so good.

It really looks like you're trying to start an argument for no reason here.

Where would u being, just watch any Jed or Chris early interview promotion of ripple, seen a few where its directly labelled by founders, inner circle as bitcoin 2, here's a 2 sec google and Chris dribbling about it being the second iteration of bitcoin  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yH4IqGaYpCU

(and math based currency wtf lol)


anyway I don't have the time to start an argument for no reason, just found it rich you knocking another coin for riding on bitoins coat tail when no matter how you paint it ripple itself did....hell look at the forum you gave the biggest giveaway on...go figure.

Not for a second am I saying such marketing is wrong or a bad idea....hell dumb not to promote any crypto/alt currency along the lines of bitcoin, one of the most widely recognised cryptos.


"If you think I have 20 billion XRP, you're off by a factor of about 10,000." oh I didn't mean it like that, added "" to make what i meant more clear.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1012
Democracy is vulnerable to a 51% attack.
October 02, 2013, 07:22:13 AM
#90
4) Putting "Bitcoin" in its name seems like a deliberate attempt to convey an official connection to Bitcoin that doesn't exist and is likely to create confusion. If its developers truly believed in it, they wouldn't do something so cynical and malicious as this.

lol this coming from an Opencoin employee with 20 billion XRP
If you think I have 20 billion XRP, you're off by a factor of about 10,000.

Quote
Jed originally constantly promoting ripple as bitcoin 2 to the uniformed and even stealing the name opencoin from a non profit credible bitcoin group just to gain some credibility for ripple
I never heard Jed do that. If you have a credible source, I'll believe you. But I never heard him do that, nor anyone else claim he did that. I have seen articles that ask rhetorically if Ripple is "Bitcoin 2.0", presumably to suggest that Ripple might replace Bitcoin. But, so far as I know, nobody is making any attempt to intentionally confuse Bitcoin and Ripple so that people think Ripple has some connection to Bitcoin that it doesn't have.

As for opencoin.org being a "bitcoin group", I'm pretty sure they're not. The OpenCoin.org folks have no connection to Bitcoin that I know of and the group became more or less inactive in 2009. And, frankly, the possibility of confusion with that group was one of the downsides to choosing 'OpenCoin' as a company name. Not because there's anything wrong with them, just because you want a name to be as unique as possible so you can choose what people associated it with. That's why names like "Amazon", "eBay", and "Microsoft" are so good.

It really looks like you're trying to start an argument for no reason here.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
October 02, 2013, 06:48:13 AM
#89

4) Putting "Bitcoin" in its name seems like a deliberate attempt to convey an official connection to Bitcoin that doesn't exist and is likely to create confusion. If its developers truly believed in it, they wouldn't do something so cynical and malicious as this.


lol this coming from an Opencoin employee with "20 billion XRP Jed" originally constantly promoting ripple as bitcoin 2 to the uniformed and even stealing the name opencoin from a non profit credible bitcoin group just to gain some credibility for ripple.....bit rich hey? just too funny.
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
October 01, 2013, 10:38:24 AM
#88
When did this come out  Shocked
Ever since some people realized that Bitcoin turned the wrong way Smiley)
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
I AM A DRAGON
October 01, 2013, 09:32:35 AM
#87
When did this come out  Shocked
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
September 27, 2013, 11:28:25 PM
#86
Of course there is "something" . When you`re interested only in making profits, not preserving the idea behind the creation of BTC, yet searching for ways to maintain the status quo -  you`re becoming like the 1% of the 1% .
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
September 27, 2013, 04:06:11 PM
#85
What is thoroughly projected is that Bitcoin SHA256 leadership is threatened by this alt coin
LOL @ calling Bitcoin Bitcoin SHA256

Mission accomplished I'd say.  Cheesy (No I'm not behind Bitcoin scrypt)
legendary
Activity: 1210
Merit: 1024
September 27, 2013, 03:32:46 PM
#84
If the point to ban it was that BTC-Scrypt overwrites your current Bitcoin-SHA256 wallet, that's not entirely true.

What happens is that when you use BTC-SHA256 it "unconfirms" (<-- Sorry English isn't my first language) all the BTC-scrypt coins and viceversa. Both work well if on the same system. To test it yourself simply back up a current BTC-SHA256 wallet, install on another machine, add BTC-S and test it.

I 100% agree with your scamming scenarios, but that's inherent in any coin really.

The newbies thing is an issue. Maybe Theymos should consider making this a private forum requiring 50 post for people to gain access. That would stop all of that dead in its tracks as well cut down on the number of scam sock puppets.

Once again, all I was saying is that by *banning* it, you increase its exposure factorial.

Must be something if they banned it.


~BCX~
Pages:
Jump to: