Topic: Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining - page 110. (Read 750581 times)

48hours no sign of withdraw yet

Guess we see the rerun of some Classic Episodes, like the 'Hacker Attack' before the new season will be broadcast.

Rumors say there are again some cliffhanger, a few guest appearances by stars, a musical episode (scrubs like) and towards the end the death of a main character.

Stay tuned!

Yeah that is the reason I did not charged anything on Misiak...just asking if he had any news on any new fairy tale coming...
because volunteers are a way of advertising as we all know........
nothing personal
Just want to know the new plot in the next season of the tv series

Cheers

I should have clarified that SCCStats and MSGRelay are run by volunteer users and have nothing to do with ScryptCC in an official context. I was simply referring to them as sources of historical price/reward data.

Yeah, I was just talking with ThePhwner about graphs at SCCSTATS. Nothing more, nothing less.

You should say bye now to scrypt.cc before it hurts even more later on

He is the owner of sccstats.com not scrypt.cc ...
he is just a normal member, like you.

PSA: scrypt.cc is a scam, most likely of the "ponzi" variety. You will lose your money if you try to "invest" or "play" or whatever you want to call your participation in this shitshow. You've been warned.

More info here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scryptcc-is-provably-lying-about-their-850ghs-scrypt-mining-1102560

1. Investor fraud began immediately when Marcelo advertised he was selling shares on a mining farm when no mining was taken place. This is investor fraud by US law and likely in other jurisdictions. From the front page of ScryptCC as of 9/2/1025:





2. The 850 Gh/s claimed which is now closer to 6000 Gh/s, cannot be accounted for on any Scrypt coin network and coin liquidity analysis on exchanges does not show volume sufficient to exchange enough Scrypt coins to support Bitcoin payouts on this site:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scryptcc-is-provably-lying-about-their-850ghs-scrypt-mining-1102560

3. Rewards have steadily diminished now for months, despite significant improvements in Scrypt mining conditions. This resulted in a price drop and extended many people's ROI into neverland. Conveniently both SccStats and MSGRelay have deleted all the KHS history and now only show a few days of MHS history.

4. Many people had 37,000 KHS mysteriously removed from their accounts. This has not been explained or corrected:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12218831
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12151050
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scryptcc-scrypt-cloud-mining-444495
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12151152
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12151183
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12151196
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12151325


5. Many people have had multiple support tickets deleted with no resolution:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12151173

6. Many people have had withdrawals cancelled and/or shown them as processed when they were never sent:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12298508
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12288899
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12288972
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12286562
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12218846
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12218875
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12219039
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12219078
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12189182


7. When KHS was converted to MHS, the overall availability went from 850 "GHS" to 6000 "GHS" with no explanation

7a. During this conversion rounding was used and many people lost KHS

7b. Once the conversion took place, the commodity was immediately devalued below the 100 satoshi per KHS threshold once again devaluing portfolios:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12226151

8. At multiple points, many people have had auto-invest force turned on, resulting in additional loss of accrued BTC:

http://bitcoinist.net/cloud-mining-provider-scrypt-cc-drains-bitcoin-user-balances/

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12288899
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12290220
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12291203
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12286569
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12286562
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12219039
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12219078
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12219252
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12219411
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12213273

Deviating from topic bringing something new.....like hack fack like khs mhs ghs.......
What more fairy tales are there .........

It is getting really entertaining......

So what is the new story now ...Going on like TV series....one season then another and then another....LOL !!!!!!

Wow.............so nice....so tell me when are going to compensate the imaginary 37000 khs stolen from each one's account. ?.........LOL !!!!....

A bug would imply there is a flaw or fault, not turning it on would be stupid human error.

A bug would imply it wasn't turned on deliberately.

A bug? That might imply that the auto-invest code was originally designed to benefit you. It wasn't. There is no bug. It is doing exactly what it was supposed to do - steal your money, and give it scrypt.cc

For me scrypt.cc is a scam. It scammed me already by turning my BTC's to worthless MHS without my knowledge and scrypt.cc did not even acknowledge that there is a bug for the auto-invest function.

To me, a scam is when someone convinces you to send them money, does not do what they said they were going to do with your money, steals your money, and never gives it back. So, by your definition, it might not be a scam. But by my definition, it is a scam.

Other scrypt.cc user thinks that since scrypt.cc is paying them every time they process a withdrawal it's not a scam.
There are other factors to consider aside from site is paying to qualify as a scam

Here is the blockchain.info report of the address my deposit to scrypt.cc eventually went to:

https://blockchain.info/address/19mcjofGwKxGwhaZwDwPjdWd1KrFCZgoJJ

5,790 BTC was sent to that address. Assuming that address was the only address used for "receiving" investor money, that means (at current prices), around $1,308,540 was deposited.

Only a small percentage of people who use scrypt.cc read this forum. Of course, that will change dramatically once everyone realizes they've been scammed. After that, nearly everyone who used scrypt.cc will have read this thread.

EDIT: Oh, and yeah - if they are taking in 100 BTC per day, and paying out 100 BTC every "couple days", that means they are stealing (100 - 100 / "couple") BTC every day. They have already sold all their hashing power. So BTC "out" should equal BTC "in" + mining profits.

Unfortunately it is not a bug. Its just a "little more" CPU consuming task to show more than 100k rows of data in graphs (its capped to last 30 days).

Oh hey, I love your site! But does anyone else encounter a weird bug whenever you enter sccstats, and your whole computer froze for like 20 seconds :\ other than that its pretty neat, I like your site.