Thank you. So, it's a game, scrypt.cc aren't mining.
You can make assumptions about my age, gender and level of intelligence all you like (standard operating procedure for scrpt.cc fans here seems to be making assumptions about sexuality, so you're doing better than some) - it's not going to anger me and I'm going to continue to ask questions until you answer them. All you had to say was "I'm a gambler" several posts ago and you'd have answered my question. However, on the subject of unrealised profits - you continue to keep money in scrypt.cc. That's silly if you're an investor. It does make (some) sense if you're a gambler - you're gambling that you will be able to realise your profits before the trapdoor is bolted shut.
theoretical profit (x + x*(1.017^95-1)-20)/x
can be partitioned in two sets:
1) U: unrealised (non withdrawn yet) and
2) R: realised (withdrawn) profit.
If x = 10 then (x + x*(1.017^95-1)-20)/x = 396%
Taking into account the price manipulations by the admin
it was less than 396% but much more than the 2% for bank deposit and the rate variation of BTC/USD:)
P.S. I like your intelligence to put clever questions
Why? What would this show me that your (eventual) answer above didn't? Your (eventual) answer showed me that you're a gambler - any advantage you see in scrypt.cc isn't likely going to be an advantage for me (because I'm not a gambler - I'm looking for investments where (a) I can assess risk and reward, and (b) the risk/reward ratio is favourable).
Going forward, when people question whether scrypt.cc is a safe investment, maybe you could acknowledge up-front that you're a gambler and don't regard scrypt.cc as cloud mining, but as a ponzi scam. That would save a lot of time, and might save some people from losing their money.
