OK, now I get it. You're trying to be funny. You really know what's going on, and you're trying to come up with the most random and bizarre scenario you can to be hilarious. Well done sir.
All right, still not quite...
I'm not being random, nor is it funny.
There seems to me to be no problem with scrypt, and momentarily i will dig through my wallet history for your evidence requests that withdraws that are successfully honored, as i am very offended by your lack of acceptance of any other rationale to be as good a solution as your own admission that you lack any real evidence other than an absurd 850 GHs.
I am not satisfied with a one track approach to anything, and I am very convinced that scrypt.cc does not possess the square mile facility network it would need to store any amount of mining peripherals required to produce such a large volume of traffic.
And so i produce an honest, reasonable theory to counter the "Absence of evidence = Evidence of Absence" theory that seems to be the only acceptable solution.
[BLARF]
[FNURGLE]
[SNIP
Oh noes, I've offended someone in an internet forum who wants to "keep things scientific." LOL, by the way, thanks for that.
Here's the thing, and you might want to take off the tinfoil hat for this:
1. The initial fraud begins with the sale of KHS backed by real mining, expounded by Marcelo's claims of 850 Gh/s.
2. Said 850 Gh/s cannot be accounted for on any coin network. That being said the only coin large enough to support that much hash would be LTC. And the math of known miners proves Marcelo isn't one of them.
3. Rewards at SCC do not match up with any scrypt mining payouts, including a DROP in ScryptCC payouts when LTC mining difficulty dropped and price shot up.
Therefore, no mining is taking place, and we have evidence of this. It's obvious based on the patterns at play, that people have already lost and will continue to lose money, and that the system becomes more unstable as new deposits cease, etc. You keep blathering on about all this SHA-256 related nonsense - where's any shred of evidence for that other than you doing too much coke, and seeing two things happen at the same time, and assuming that they MUST be connected.
People here have mentioned Occam's razor. You clearly do not know what that is or its applicability to this situation.
EDIT: Please spare us your fucking poetry too. Are you kidding me with that?
