Topic: Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining - page 130. (Read 750579 times)

OK, now I get it. You're trying to be funny. You really know what's going on, and you're trying to come up with the most random and bizarre scenario you can to be hilarious. Well done sir.
[/quote]


All right, still not quite...

I'm not being random, nor is it funny.

There seems to me to be no problem with scrypt, and momentarily i will dig through my wallet history for your evidence requests that withdraws that are successfully honored, as i am very offended by your lack of acceptance of any other rationale to be as good a solution as your own admission that you lack any real evidence other than an absurd 850 GHs.

I am not satisfied with a one track approach to anything, and I am very convinced that scrypt.cc does not possess the square mile facility network it would need to store any amount of mining peripherals required to produce such a large volume of traffic.

And so i produce an honest, reasonable theory to counter the "Absence of evidence = Evidence of Absence" theory that seems to be the only acceptable solution. I have never had issues with scrypt.cc, and perhaps i am lucky after all. However my deposits post now just as quickly as before the power scandal, painfully slowly. I have only requested 5 withdrawals, all of them honored, and before you speak ill, i will produce results, and i will provide them. However i have never mined a profit of what my hashing power was, and was in fact producing only what i had rightfully invested. Before the "Hacker" my investment totaled 150MH, and cost me $300 and produced $5. Now ask yourself what miner in the world produces 150MH, costs $300, and produces more volume than was literally invested in itself.

The simple fact is, scrypt.cc is not selling hash power 1:1, and in fact as a share. A page from your own book tells you that PAMIC is the same and you swear by that. But Bitmain is a company, and needs to respond to keep their business. Marcello Santos is an individual, insult and slander him enough, and I'd hide too and make sure none of you got anything. Believe what you want, but i will provide your evidence, and any disputes to my suggestion that 850 GH is too high to be anything but a magic share count, should as well be supported by evidence.

If you can't See anymore, this thread has ceased being about Scrypt.cc in general and now a flame train. I request a bit of civility, and organization. If somebody does have a problem, and has a reasonable concern to doubt the validity of scrypt.cc, please preempt any form of loss that we may all use to define fact from guesswork. If you can please take regular screenshots of before and after any form of potentially disputable claim, as i have seen many requests to prove ones success to no avail, but no requests for evidence of failures. And To lead in my own request i will produce my successful withdrawal transactions. I will return when i do, but please understand, the admin of scrypt.cc is only human too, please extend to him the due process of an evidence based investigation that you yourselves would request in his stead.

From now on lets try to keep things cleaner and scientific, please. The internet needs less flame wars.

Kenny

Edit:My transaction ids:

9560f6c1bbf4d968cd65a6a18c686d96e212e912097a740991ae15122a352fa7
2d09b35ae304b441ac0e507bbcc3818659619d62803038086e964105f99a5768
2deda5e3f099e3d8e14abcbf40e0b8e2dcfe8e50f0e532d97ed72e8e7895138a
2cf9da80f184f5be4bf39cb91c193cd0af8998693c2c5f3793c964914fd3d256

I must apologize off the bat, i have had in fact 4 successful withdrawals and not 5. I did not check my Scrypt with draw page before hand and was off by 1.

It is very strange how nobody here but Thorswallow gets paid and everyone else has so many bs problems. I'm actually surprised that no REAL hacker haven't made this site their full time job, too. I keep waiting for it to end, but its worse than gaw ffs.... 

the Auto Invest turn on by itself !!!

We need to control our money every action 3confirmation is enough.
rewards needs to go up from now on instead of decreasing.

Why, whatever do you mean? He's carefully laid out his factually researched theory that now involves Bitmain and SHA-256 mining and the disappearance of S5+ miners, and he learned it from playing RuneScape. I'm not sure why you would have any doubts...

Kenny is a idiot

My money is on Kenny being another sock-puppet of the scammers.

Wanting to speculate about still being able to profit from scrypt.cc and also playing down the 'admin'/ThorSWO connection.

That's Occam's razor.

Occam's razor

simple as that.

OK, now I get it. You're trying to be funny. You really know what's going on, and you're trying to come up with the most random and bizarre scenario you can to be hilarious. Well done sir.

On a scale of density between 1 being Satoshi Nakamoto and 10 being Josh Garza you are scoring a solid 11. YOU DID NOT SCAM A SCAMMER. You got lucky in admin's withdrawal lottery, assuming you were actually able to withdraw - not quite clear from your ramblings. There is no plausible scenario in which you would be getting money that hasn't been deposited by other victims of this ponzi.

Just as there is absolutely no reason for the admin to buy mining hardware and share mining revenue, Scrypt or SHA256 or otherwise. He's already got your and everyone's BTC, and he's going to trickle a little bit of it back to keep this going. Which part of this is so hard to understand?

there are "rewards" though 1 mh is still worth 1 kh, im looking at it right now and going to try my hand at my same reverse scam that got me $300 simply by letting it auto invest for a month straight, selling it all, and withdrawing. if the transaction does get pulled then i have lost nothing that i was not willing to lose. a happy meal is not sounding as good as my bacon egg and cheese burgers i usually make, so my $5 is not of importance lol

I've been getting my 10 minute payouts like clockwork.
Try harder.

This just illustrates the level of fantasy present in the average cloud mining investor.

By the way, there is no more rewards coming in...

You know the rewards you are supposely being able to withdraw...

Yes i was never good in LA class, i did write decent poetry though...

As to the point of sha, im not saying hes mining it for use with the website, the timing of a BTC sale last monday, followed momentarily by the purchase of antminer s5+ units corresponding to such a larg btc transaction, as well as scrypt.cc changing from khs to mhs within minutes is kind of suspicious. If you follow the history of sccstats you'll find that in the middle of sunday night/ monday morning, scrypt managed to convert them over to the new profile. I honestly have no idea where peoples coins that are getting pulled by the admin are going, however the 10K btc transaction sunday evening resulted in a sharp fall that quickly recovered. all im suggesting is admin is looking for a way out. and perhaps his out is in a mining farm for real this time that might not ever get connected otherwise. i see no other person with 10K btc that needs to go as badly as this guy does.

it is only a suggestion as to where the stolen money has gone and the silent disappearing act the admin has done, nothing more. if the admin has not purchased the large volume of miners then he still has evidence stuck to his red hands.

sorry for not speaking very well on a forum, i simply speak better face to face not in writing lol

Not only do you strike out half of what you type, you sound like you're coked to the gills and just rambling through your keyboard. I don't know what you're trying to say, but there are cold hard facts at play, and you don't seem to be able to grasp any of them

I have no idea why you keep talking about SHA mining. Everything Marcelo has ever said and done is related to Scrypt and measured in KHS/MHS. Talking about Antminer S5 and S5+ belongs in another thread.

Good for you for making $300. I was able to glean that. Beyond that gem, no idea what you're trying to say. Sad thing is you're obviously an English speaker, you're just terrible at it.

I apologize, i have not been clear...
If i have reviewd this thread for as many weeks as i believe i have, after stopping when i got bored, then i am very aware that there is no mining Scrypt at scrypt.cc.
I do see a significant chance that the sudden dropping of 10K btc, purchase of 1000 bitmain antminer s5+ and immediate jump of several PH on bitcoin all at the moment scrypt ceased selling KH and merged to MH, as a bid by marcello santos to take these coins i am being told are stolen as a means to fund Scrypt.cc's forclosure permanently. I dont ever recall suggesting that admin actually has room for 10000 A2 terminator units, that would take quite the facility, however 1000 similarly sized units of SHA256 miners that are sufficiently powerful enough to generate a profit margin of $7-10K daily with an ROI of 1 year, signs Scrypt.cc's death warrant and is little more than conjecture as nobody is suggesting an alternative to where the large volume of btc has actually gone.

I seem to be misspoken and ill informed. I was under the impression people knew how to read and could place logic with reasoning. By your own claim, no scrypt.cc does not mine anything. But until you know who marcello santos/ThorSWO/Admin actually is, his/her existence might as well be me or you... By your own admission as well as the forum, Scrypt.cc is stealing BTC. If there is only 150BTC then there are no new deposits. If there are new deposits then there is >150BTC. Your cold hard facts are as good a guess as mine. And where ever the newly deposited BTC goes, is either irreverent, or spent elsewhere. Scrypt.cc does not have more than the Mathematically Provable amount that it has, and therefore the rest is gone. And either the timing is all just very coincidental to coincide just moments apart from one another, or they are incidentally connected, but either way bitmain no longer has the s5+ unit in stock, btc took a nose dive, and scrypt.cc now gives daily rewards instead of 10min rewards. Coincident or incident, Either guess is correct. Fact is fact my friend, and i have not denied it. Any assumption that i did is just foolhardy, as im simply surprised that on sunday night i can go to bed contemplating a new s5+ purchase, and wake up to a 10K btc market plummet, no more s5+ and scrypt.cc as i find out today, kills all rewards...I swear i only was out for 4 hours that night...Thats hella close to really call shenanigans...

Edit2: BTW im 30 minutes in after leaving plenty of btc for an auto-invest...none so far, as well as daily reward is actually higher than stated, to reiterate, im only interested in numbers, magic or otherwise...i am a coder after all, i enjoy doing this kind of thing no need to attack me. i already split with a cool $300 profit from the loser before with the same exact deposit amount, scamming a scammer is what i do best, i do play RuneScape after all lol...

You need to review this thread. There's no mining and that's been mathematically proven. The amount of hash he claims to have can not be accounted for on any Scrypt coin networks and the rewards have never been in line with Scrypt mining difficulty or rewards. Your analogy to SHA mining is also wildly inaccurate. And his algorithm isn't that complex - you divide the amt of new BTC deposits by the # of shares held by investors and there's your reward.

He's not mining with Scrypt or SHA. He's not mining at all. This has been proven and no half-wit theory you come up with will contradict the cold hard facts.

To site your own claim, im not saying the mining is for users, an s5+ is a 7.72 TH unit, 1000 = 7.72PH or last week ~ $15K/day. if the admin is stealing coins doesnt that just mean hes using them elsewhere reusing a handful and building an actual farm in say, china, who subsidizes farms btw, using the rest...?
And if he is stealing the volume suggested, i see no other reason to not validate both our claims with each other.
Stolen money is hot money, spent money goes cold, miners of that volume generate profit for the criminal, and the cycle repeats. It is not a Ponzi, per se, but a revolving door Ponzi...
edit ponzis die scrypt yet lives...that is what i mean by revolving door...

There is no mining. he recycle coins. many withdraws just disappear (over 150 BTC now), and many other withdrawals are not from user, they are from admin. he send them to a mixer and back to the hotwallet. so it looks like there is action.

there is NO MINING. it is a PONZI.