The datacenter move only showed a small part of the claimed 850 GHs was possibly on LTC network. (~150 GHs or so)
Do you really think that if you repeat this long enough it will become true?
There was no such thing. There was no visible reduction in LTC network hashrate that would have lasted for ~48 hours and would have coincided with the "move". If you have proof to the contrary you're gonna need to post the block times and by extension we can then figure out which pool "admin" was supposed to be mining on. Two birds with one stone, good deal.
It is also technically impossible to perform such a move within that timeframe, even at 150 GH/s. That's ~500 Titans or ~1500 Terminators. Ask anybody who's done these things if you don't believe me.
Let's get one thing straight, you are the one repeating themselves over and over, not me.
There was a drop.
May 14 2015 39,268 -5.30% 1,124 GH/s
May 10 2015 41,466 6.91% 1,187 GH/s
You don't have any proof that drop wasn't caused by scypt.cc. The only thing we can say for sure is that there wasn't anywhere near 850 GHs removed from the LTC network. There have a few bigger hits too, so this isn't proof that the drop was from scrypt.cc, the timing just lines up. At the time fast average dropped like a rock. The real problem isn't the hit, it is the speed of the recovery. The hit timing match up but the recovery was quicker than it should have been. At the time the hit was very visible on the 504 average.
Additionally scrypt.cc has always claimed the they mostly mine other alt coins besides LTC. So we don't have real proof either way and there multiple things that could have happen that would have produced the same results.
So all we have is a lack of proof of 850 GHs. Maybe we have proof of a smaller amount, I do agree it isn't great proof.
