Pages:
Author

Topic: Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining - page 86. (Read 750579 times)

sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
September 14, 2015, 07:06:41 AM
... if the admin is please give back our btc because we need it....

My friend, I'm afraid you're going to experience some more disappointments in this business.
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1046
September 14, 2015, 06:59:34 AM
is it still paying? my btc did not arrive it is still pending right now..... if the admin is please give back our btc because we need it....
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
September 14, 2015, 06:48:19 AM
Movement on the Payout Wallet.
It's 08:30 in Brazil. Looks like he is processing it by hand.

Oh, and the rewards are now official 0.946
Down another 30% Cheesy


hehe come here 30% 1PYANLmFZ3HvRdZt4JZKmqQEJdPkQzjHrN
 Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink Wink
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
September 14, 2015, 06:38:54 AM
Movement on the Payout Wallet.
It's 08:30 in Brazil. Looks like he is processing it by hand.

Oh, and the rewards are now official 0.946
Down another 30% Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
Join @Bountycloud for the best bounties!
September 14, 2015, 06:30:59 AM
I have been on that site when it was good why the hell this shit has to go on, I have lost a couple btc now and I and thru.
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
September 14, 2015, 06:27:49 AM
Thank you Admin Scrypt.cc
My withdraw after recevied.
  Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley Smiley
thankyou very much...
sr. member
Activity: 584
Merit: 252
September 14, 2015, 06:04:17 AM
random pickings...lottery Grin
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
September 14, 2015, 05:40:34 AM
so marcelo is processing withdrawls for some particular people ?
yes, for his shills.

There seems to be no pattern.
In IRC some people report their WD was canceled again.
Including some "shills". And some neutral members.
Many others got their.

The size also seems to play no role. Some over 1 BTC went through, some with 0.05 were canceled.

Looks to me more like First in / First out or random pick.

My last WD is still 'in queue' and my 1.5 BTC are still disappeared.
Several WD before and after mine got processed.
Guess I have made myself unpopular, hehe.
hero member
Activity: 553
Merit: 500
September 14, 2015, 05:15:32 AM
The problem is, dyask, that you cite objective reasoning as your main motivator behind your assertions about scrypt.cc, yet you clearly fail to apply it correctly, which usually implies intentional bias. This is the reason why you are being challenged so vociferously, because your attempt to come across as analytical ends up reading like a veiled apologist.

What is wrong with trying to be objective?  I'm not making assertions either but I guess you don't really understand what an assertion is.  

Nobody is saying there's anything wrong with being objective, trouble is you're not being objective because you are posting assertions about what you believe is a hashrate drop as a result of scrypt.cc moving a bunch of ASICs when the only basis for this is you discarding the declared total mining power scrypt.cc claim to have and, instead, deciding that maybe some of their lie might be true.

Methinks you neither understand objective reasoning nor the meaning of the word 'assertion'.
You got a nice signature out there ..
are you paying for that ? lmao.. i am interested if .
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1254
Thread-puller extraordinaire
September 14, 2015, 05:09:20 AM
The problem is, dyask, that you cite objective reasoning as your main motivator behind your assertions about scrypt.cc, yet you clearly fail to apply it correctly, which usually implies intentional bias. This is the reason why you are being challenged so vociferously, because your attempt to come across as analytical ends up reading like a veiled apologist.

What is wrong with trying to be objective?  I'm not making assertions either but I guess you don't really understand what an assertion is.  

Nobody is saying there's anything wrong with being objective, trouble is you're not being objective because you are posting assertions about what you believe is a hashrate drop as a result of scrypt.cc moving a bunch of ASICs when the only basis for this is you discarding the declared total mining power scrypt.cc claim to have and, instead, deciding that maybe some of their lie might be true.

Methinks you neither understand objective reasoning nor the meaning of the word 'assertion'.
hero member
Activity: 553
Merit: 500
September 14, 2015, 05:06:32 AM
I am ready to give 30% to those who help with the withdrawal!
Even if you are willing to give away 90% of the coins ,i am afraid you will ever get your 10% coins back
as unless you go to his door and kick his ass.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1005
Decentralized Asset Management Platform
September 14, 2015, 05:04:14 AM
Let me preface this with, I'm 99% sure Scrypt.cc is a scam/ponzi or something else not legit.

But I just wanted to say you can still withdraw cash.
2015-09-13 15:40:56 / 1.41700839btc

That was a withdrawal that I actually did about 6 days ago.
They changed the date when it went through, but I requested it 6 days ago.

And here you can see it arrived:
https://blockchain.info/address/1CiAaYaZsLxHtVw3UBrTyawfzwpkiA91GJ

So it is still slowly ticking over. Ponzi hasn't collapsed yet.

what proof you have got so that anyone should believe that you are a user and not a puppet of marcelo ??
Real companies dont work this way...6 days ,2 days what is this shit ..?

Lol I dont care if you believe me or not.
I put down my address where you can see it came out to.

Take it or leave it, all I'm saying is for me it came through.

I would still never advise anyone to invest in Scrypt, but was just letting people know that had already invested that WD are slowly trickling through it seems.
OK just read the post above mine ,the user MXP100 clearly explains how he was unable to receive the coins ?
so marcelo is processing withdrawls for some particular people ?

yes, for his shills.
Yeah kind of ,i am waiting to see a thread made of shills ,complaining santos didnt even paid them .loll
i guess he has 1 on every forum .
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
September 14, 2015, 04:42:41 AM
I am ready to give 30% to those who help with the withdrawal!
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
September 14, 2015, 04:40:16 AM
Let me preface this with, I'm 99% sure Scrypt.cc is a scam/ponzi or something else not legit.

But I just wanted to say you can still withdraw cash.
2015-09-13 15:40:56 / 1.41700839btc

That was a withdrawal that I actually did about 6 days ago.
They changed the date when it went through, but I requested it 6 days ago.

And here you can see it arrived:
https://blockchain.info/address/1CiAaYaZsLxHtVw3UBrTyawfzwpkiA91GJ

So it is still slowly ticking over. Ponzi hasn't collapsed yet.

what proof you have got so that anyone should believe that you are a user and not a puppet of marcelo ??
Real companies dont work this way...6 days ,2 days what is this shit ..?

Lol I dont care if you believe me or not.
I put down my address where you can see it came out to.

Take it or leave it, all I'm saying is for me it came through.

I would still never advise anyone to invest in Scrypt, but was just letting people know that had already invested that WD are slowly trickling through it seems.
OK just read the post above mine ,the user MXP100 clearly explains how he was unable to receive the coins ?
so marcelo is processing withdrawls for some particular people ?

yes, for his shills.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1005
Decentralized Asset Management Platform
September 14, 2015, 04:37:25 AM
Let me preface this with, I'm 99% sure Scrypt.cc is a scam/ponzi or something else not legit.

But I just wanted to say you can still withdraw cash.
2015-09-13 15:40:56 / 1.41700839btc

That was a withdrawal that I actually did about 6 days ago.
They changed the date when it went through, but I requested it 6 days ago.

And here you can see it arrived:
https://blockchain.info/address/1CiAaYaZsLxHtVw3UBrTyawfzwpkiA91GJ

So it is still slowly ticking over. Ponzi hasn't collapsed yet.

what proof you have got so that anyone should believe that you are a user and not a puppet of marcelo ??
Real companies dont work this way...6 days ,2 days what is this shit ..?

Lol I dont care if you believe me or not.
I put down my address where you can see it came out to.

Take it or leave it, all I'm saying is for me it came through.

I would still never advise anyone to invest in Scrypt, but was just letting people know that had already invested that WD are slowly trickling through it seems.
OK just read the post above mine ,the user MXP100 clearly explains how he was unable to receive the coins ?
so marcelo is processing withdrawls for some particular people ?
sr. member
Activity: 305
Merit: 250
September 14, 2015, 04:03:48 AM
Let me preface this with, I'm 99% sure Scrypt.cc is a scam/ponzi or something else not legit.

But I just wanted to say you can still withdraw cash.
2015-09-13 15:40:56 / 1.41700839btc

That was a withdrawal that I actually did about 6 days ago.
They changed the date when it went through, but I requested it 6 days ago.

And here you can see it arrived:
https://blockchain.info/address/1CiAaYaZsLxHtVw3UBrTyawfzwpkiA91GJ

So it is still slowly ticking over. Ponzi hasn't collapsed yet.

what proof you have got so that anyone should believe that you are a user and not a puppet of marcelo ??
Real companies dont work this way...6 days ,2 days what is this shit ..?

Lol I dont care if you believe me or not.
I put down my address where you can see it came out to.

Take it or leave it, all I'm saying is for me it came through.

I would still never advise anyone to invest in Scrypt, but was just letting people know that had already invested that WD are slowly trickling through it seems.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1005
Decentralized Asset Management Platform
September 14, 2015, 03:52:57 AM
Let me preface this with, I'm 99% sure Scrypt.cc is a scam/ponzi or something else not legit.

But I just wanted to say you can still withdraw cash.
2015-09-13 15:40:56 / 1.41700839btc

That was a withdrawal that I actually did about 6 days ago.
They changed the date when it went through, but I requested it 6 days ago.

And here you can see it arrived:
https://blockchain.info/address/1CiAaYaZsLxHtVw3UBrTyawfzwpkiA91GJ

So it is still slowly ticking over. Ponzi hasn't collapsed yet.

what proof you have got so that anyone should believe that you are a user and not a puppet of marcelo ??
Real companies dont work this way...6 days ,2 days what is this shit ..?
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
September 14, 2015, 03:50:30 AM
Withdraw Bitcoin was made on August 12 2015.

2015-08-12 15:51:41 / 6.64235720 BTC
He was confirmed, but money never arrived. How long can you wait for checks and refunds?

Account: mxp1000

Withdraw address: 12e2iqXGnpHiM6fyvGBx1aCUz6bdGdqahG
sr. member
Activity: 305
Merit: 250
September 14, 2015, 03:17:38 AM
Let me preface this with, I'm 99% sure Scrypt.cc is a scam/ponzi or something else not legit.

But I just wanted to say you can still withdraw cash.
2015-09-13 15:40:56 / 1.41700839btc

That was a withdrawal that I actually did about 6 days ago.
They changed the date when it went through, but I requested it 6 days ago.

And here you can see it arrived:
https://blockchain.info/address/1CiAaYaZsLxHtVw3UBrTyawfzwpkiA91GJ

So it is still slowly ticking over. Ponzi hasn't collapsed yet.
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1024
September 14, 2015, 02:49:00 AM
The problem is, dyask, that you cite objective reasoning as your main motivator behind your assertions about scrypt.cc, yet you clearly fail to apply it correctly, which usually implies intentional bias. This is the reason why you are being challenged so vociferously, because your attempt to come across as analytical ends up reading like a veiled apologist.

What is wrong with trying to be objective?  I'm not making assertions either but I guess you don't really understand what an assertion is.  

As far as applying my knowledge, how would you know what I'm doing?   I'm one of the few that managed to get out of BTCarbs whole, maybe I was lucky but I didn't do buy just screaming scam, scam, scam!   For the record the BTCArbs admin that paid some people back, claimed is was intended to be real and not a scam at all.    With LTCgear, I'm in vastly deeper than here and that is mainly because some of the people here screaming scam about scrypt.cc were singing LTCgears praise.   That one burns but I'm going after my losses there multiple ways.  LTCgear stopped paying last December.  

With scrypt.cc things look really bad, I'll grant you that.   We don't know what is really going on there but lately it has just been getting worse.   I've had many chats with Marcello the Admin there in the past and I don't believe he is out to hurt people, however, I don't know if he is in control.   It fact it would appear that whoever is currently running scrypt.cc has no problems with outright theft.   I'll take steps, but my current focus is just to minimize losses.   This could play out for many months.  

At no point have I ever not claimed these types of investments aren't risky.   The closest claim to supporting scypt.cc I've ever made, is saying a much shorter time to breakeven gives people more options for how to manage an investment.   However, that doesn't apply to scrypt.cc anymore because it isn't possible to get your investment out easily.  Until the "hack" it was always easy to get your money out of scrypt.cc, that was important and something that set it apart in a lot of ways.  That when on for well over a year.  That has changed and it changes everything.   I don't mean the up to 24 hour delay, that could be lived with.   I mean getting withdraws is extremely difficult an appears to mostly require a lot of luck.      

For the record every BTC related investment I've been involved in has been called a Ponzi
, except for the loaning sites which have so many other scam borrowers.   That includes all the sites that have been cleared as legit too by providing proof of mining.   As an example there people jumping up here and there claiming hashnest is a scam, at least on the hashnest chat.  

Seeing a scam is easy.  Avoiding them or getting out of them isn't so easy unless you don't diversify.  

EDIT: I've been burned before at scrypt.cc and recovered there too.   I don't know if this is the end or not, but the hit this time is very minor.   Don't invest what you can't afford to use is the best rule to follow on every type of investment.  

The problem is that you have a vested interest in keeping the scam going long enough for you to get out. I have no problem calling a spade a spade as I won't let other people hold onto my own funds.

But you complain that people are posting links to collective evidence pointing to why it is a scam because it hinders you from your exit.

Let me ask you this, what cloudmining site have you invested in that hasn't been a Ponzi scheme?

so far I see

BTCarbs - Collapsed
Hashie.co - Collapsed
BTCjam - Collapsed
LTCgear- Collapsed
Scrypt.cc - Collapsing
BTCjam is a lending site and it hasn't collapsed but it is riddled with scams.   Hashie.co was only 0.005 BTC, that wasn't an investment, it was a test.  

I have a vested interest?   Well that is true with LTCgear, but nothing else.    With scrypt.cc I'll try just like everyone else to pull out some BTC.   Why wouldn't I?    What in the world is wrong with that?   I'm not trying to keep it going and there is nothing I could do in short order to promote it or stop it.   (Long term is different)

However you have missed the bulk of my crypto investments:
CEX.io - At least until the maintenance fee forced everyone to shut down.   I used bots there a lot for a while.  (I wrote the bots)
PTS/AngleShares - I even wrote my own miner for that one.  This has branched in many directions.    It was very fast on the i7 processor I used.
Many different investments through Havelock including b.buy & b.sell which are 100% virtual.
Many, many BTC worth of mining rentals not to mention local mining.  (After all I wrote my own PTS miner)
Bulk of BTC mining is now at Hashnest because it is cheaper than what I could do.
Tons of BTCjam loans, been scammed a lot there, more than any other place
AMHash which I sold days before it when scam.  
GAW where I just gained a little.   I could have gained a lot if I has sold out more.
Mining and selling xpy for one week was great!  People renting rigs made profits and so di the rig owners .. win/win.

In fact I have turned up my nose at Genesis mining, Mining Sweden and Get Hashing only because the price was so high that I don't they will ever hit breakeven, at least for people that didn't join early.  

Anyway if you diversify you are going to be bitten sometimes.

EDIT: I was really against Hashnest when it came out because it was very expensive and there wasn't a market.   They added a market for the shares and that made all the difference.   Get Hashing is also evolving so what I said about it may no longer apply.   


Fair enough, I didn't dig all the way back to the beginning and will ease up a little as I appreciate the detailed response.

I wish Bitcointalk would just do what GetHashing does and if it does not have any proof or seems fishy, that they would just put it on the watchlist as it would pretty much solve this whole scenario.
Pages:
Jump to: