Perfect example. That is in no way factual or objective or otherwise helpful to anyone. Just something you made up to justify the scam. Disgusting.
Thank you for proving my point! You are no longer objective. You took part of statement out of context and twisted it to something else. Very lame.
In fact if the withdraws were processed in 24 hours like the site claims, it would be okay. It is a way to slow down someone from draining the wallets. You don't have to like it or agree with it. However that isn't what I said, is it?
Here let me help you out:
"Part of the slow down is reasonable, it gives the site time to kill a hacker's withdraws. However we are way past that and now the withdraws are a serious issue. Now there isn't any assurance that BTC can be withdraw once it is deposited."
The disgusting thing is how you try to twist something that even supports your view to a something else, it seems just to cause trouble.
EDIT: There was a great deal of discussion around the withdraw change on IRC. It isn't something I made up. At the time the Admin was still talking with us once or twice a week.