Topic: Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining - page 97. (Read 750579 times)

To be fair, most trading engines will allow you to put in buy orders for any amount.

Here's an order to buy 500 million CLAMs at 1 satoshi each on poloniex. Only ~15 million exist in total:

Three days? 

Try ONE MONTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It's not a bug. It's the plan of the site owner. Your money is gone.

it looks withdrawal bug is still there . Im waiting for my two last WD three days now. I do not believe they will come to my wallet, I leave zeros on my accounts, then why he should give me my money, right? Probably I didnt deposit enough to withdraw .

What the fuck are you even talking about here? I'm not a moderator and the thread was never self-moderated. You want to attack me personally for some imaginary shit - feel free but please create a new thread for it. STOP DERAILING A SCAM THREAD WITH ANOTHER SCAM FFS.


Just as I thought, a multi-paragraph justification/rationalization of a simple fact - theft. If it was "fat-fingered" it should have been un-fat-fingered by now. Where do you draw the line? 100 MH/s? 1000 MH/s? When does it become "theft" without any "ifs" or "buts"?

What do you mean "smaller accounts"? How small exactly?

Yeah ok sure. What about them plummeting after the "hack," dropping when LTC mining difficulty dropped, dropping when LTC price spiked, and still being a pittance of what they were, with the last claim from admin on 7/20 being that they would return to normal rates? Care to attempt to explain those reward drops away? BTW disagreeing with one portion of an argument and ignoring the rest, is just that - myopic and incomplete. Try again.

Reward before that, was between 17.7 and 18.3.
Just for the log: It is 1.4 now.

50 Pages later you still talking shit.
Never gets boring, eh?

Wrong once again, dumbass.
Rates normalized after the electricity issue.

Still a minor percentage will always be left...because there is no limit to GREED

This forum already taken over by 4/5 people claiming scrypt.cc scam ponzi .. if this continue scryptcc The End in short time.

Hell no we are having too much fun playing the I told you ---- I told you first game

I would love to read the explanation of how you come to such an absurd thought construct.

But yeah, sounds totally logical.
Not Marcelo is to blame for the low rewards.
This forum is!

That just explains everything!

LOL. You think payouts are down because of FUD? Payouts dropped during the "power issue" and haven't been back since. Dropped again during the "hack." If any FUD caused payouts to decrease it's Marcelo's FUD-speak of "power outages and hacks and DC moves OH MY."

Payouts are down because deposits are dwindling and/or Marcelo decided to keep more BTC.

I think we can forget about Rewards going up. with so much fud already impossible.

1. This isn't a forum for BTCJam. If investors on that platform wanted to fund a loan for gambling, that's on them.

2. The facts in evidence aren't opinions. I'm not angry because dysak doesn't agree with me, I'm frustrated because he's ignoring facts and trying to defend Marcelo's practices. The fractional mining nonsense is a distraction, as is any talk about Paycoin or LTCGear or anything not ScryptCC.  Right now I don't see a need to be tolerant of anyone claiming ScryptCC is mining at all, without any proof of mining. This isn't about feelings and opinions, it's about numbers. And dysak's numbers come from his mind and his mind only, vs publicly available numbers that prove ScryptCC isn't mining. Many of you seem to be blind to the fact that the dysak show has taken focus away from the core problem. If I stop posting will ScryptCC become less of a scam? If I give credibility to this "fractional mining" bullshit will all those people who didn't get their withdrawals suddenly get them? If I remove my negative rating from dysak's profile will Marcelo suddenly be able to prove he's mining?

I will once again state I will stop posting here if dysak can disprove my claims and put the focus back where it needs to be, namely that

PSA: scrypt.cc is a scam, most likely of the "ponzi" variety. You will lose your money if you try to "invest" or "play" or whatever you want to call your participation in this shitshow. You've been warned.

More info here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scryptcc-is-provably-lying-about-their-850ghs-scrypt-mining-1102560

This guy?

Yeah, he's like the king of the scryptards. 

You are just angry about him not accepting your opinion. That is emotional. He has done nothing wrong.
It would be different if he would claim something like to get withdrawals and in reality he does not.
So he doesn't lie and has not scammed anyone.

If he wouldn't believe what he writes, he wouldn't still use scrypt.cc.

I give you a better person to be angry about.
https://btcjam.com/listings/44010-mining-expansion,-trading-and-invest-at-btcjam-%234-
He loaned 30 BTC to invest in scrypt.cc, AFTER it was obvious to be a scam

Then the rewards decreased and he had to open another loan to pay the first:
https://btcjam.com/listings/49807-refinancing:-mining-expansion,-trading-and-invest-at-btcjam-%234-

@ time of opening the loan he had 8500MH/s

Obviously he has no other sources of income that could pay off the debt, otherwise he wouldn't take an additional loan with 50% interest.


Now he is still reeinvesting although he can't pay the rates of the first loan:

When scrypt.cc will finally pay nothing he will have to default.
It is clear that it's not his intention to defraud his investors, but it will happen.

He is probably a trustworthy person but plain stupid. And this with other peoples money.

Just to clarify, there are now people, yorll in particular, taking the position that if we're not currently invested in the scam, we don't "have the right" to discuss and/or point out the scam nature of it. So because I invested briefly in ScryptCC, saw through the bullshit, and backed out, I no longer have the right to comment?

Hang on while I laugh my ass off. If you really find that to be true, then feel free to contact the IC3 and tell them you're sad because you don't like what the bigger boy said about your PonziParty. I'll wait.

By your logic, it's fine to start a scam and take people's coins, the only issues arise when people, who by your weird moral compass don't 'have the right' to comment, choose to.

My 12 year old stepson does the same thing when I point out he's doing something wrong. It's a classic deflection tactic. Just like talking about Paycoin or LTCGear or hinging on one of the elements that make this a scam while ignoring the other 20.

And ddysak while you're on another one of your rants about how much I post, why don't you do a post count for the past, say 8 pages, and see how much of it is your drivel?

Until there's proof of mining from ScryptCC none of you shills and idiots have a defensible position. And dysak, to your point about it being hard to prove mining with ASICs... it's actually quite simple if you're really mining. Especially on your own pools. Nice little thing we call a coinbase. To me the hashrate analysis proves that there's no mining because you can't hide hash; it would be a trivial task to put custom coinbases in blocks mined to prove mining. Of course that assumes that, you are actually mining.


This is the 3rd PM from dysak being upset about my negative trust in him. I'm not responding in PM and I've already laid out my criteria for removing my negative trust from his profile.

It's not about anything between you and me dysak, its about your distortion of reality around ScryptCC. Disprove my claims, and the negative trust will be removed. Post whatever you want on my profile.

Me, too.

Has any one Login Again ??