Wut?
All I meant was that if somebody cracks Shadowsend for $1500 Ill drink my piss for a week. Sorry that wasnt clearer.
Regarding Zeuner (henceforth known as "He who shall not be named"). Maybe he's just my cross to bear. Still dealing with it. Sad thing is anybody who wants to peer review shadowsend (hopefully before it's de-anon'd, lol) will probably request the same documentation He did.
Or to put it another way…
At the end of last year you created a unique cryptographic protocol and well over 6 months later you have still not provided adequate documentation so that it may be reviewed.
Roger & Out.
That's not the most efficient way to test it. Just copsource it.
Set up drug deals, murder plots, terrorist activity etc. with accomplices through Shadowsend. Transfer packages to accomplices on streetcorners, bury caches in the woods, and of course they all contain nothing. But assume the best code-crackers in the world who work for government are working on it and giving information to the police. You're setting up a honeypot. If nobody touches you or your imaginary bombs and kilograms of heroin it's a safe bet they were unable to read your sinister messages.