$1500 to de-anon (crack) shadowsend. whilst i appreciate the modest means of the devs im not sure if this rings confidence, esp pre-Zeuner. otherwise a good initiative.
This is starting to get boring now.
You think a single peer review of ShadowSend.v2 means it is perfect? No it does not.
It took years and several dozens if not hundreds of peer reviews on Bitcoin. What the Shadow development team has done is "put its money where its mouth is" and quite frankly has protected your investment for years to come by incentiving users to 1. peer review and 2. pre-disclose any security vulnerabilities so they can be fixed (this is exactly how ethical hackers work).
I wish you would start to look at the good people do rather than always the negative.
Over and out!
He probably won't understand why you're attacking him like this.
Wut?
All I meant was that if somebody cracks Shadowsend for $1500 Ill drink my piss for a week. Sorry that wasnt clearer.
Regarding Zeuner (henceforth known as "He who shall not be named"). Maybe he's just my cross to bear. Still dealing with it. Sad thing is anybody who wants to peer review shadowsend (hopefully before it's de-anon'd, lol) will probably request the same documentation He did.
Or to put it another way…
At the end of last year you created a unique cryptographic protocol and well over 6 months later you have still not provided adequate documentation so that it may be reviewed.
Roger & Out.
