Traffic at seals has dropped significantly in the past several months? What the explaination? There aren't any other cash rooms to speak of. It is the collusion? The price of bitcoin dropping?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Thanks
Topic: SealsWithClubs.eu | Largest Bitcoin Poker Site | No Banking | Fast Cashouts - page 64. (Read 1404011 times)
October 05, 2014, 09:03:12 PM
October 05, 2014, 08:03:26 PM
Fast cashouts? That's a joke to me, mine took 12 hours.
Lol.. how many confirmations needed?
October 05, 2014, 04:51:39 PM
People don't play online poker with btc as much when the price drops because they feel like they're just playing to win money back not to actually play to win money.
October 05, 2014, 04:36:31 PM
Fast cashouts? That's a joke to me, mine took 12 hours.
October 05, 2014, 04:25:12 PM
There is a BIG BTC coming in ~35 minutes or so
10 bitcoins guaranteed (no matter how much value they hold)
EACH AND EVERY WEEK!
also, we are rolling out our new tournament format with a Sunday 25 chip HU Shootout that I have been playing each weekend. It's pretty cool / check out a small upgrade which paves the path for bigger ones.
10 bitcoins guaranteed (no matter how much value they hold)
EACH AND EVERY WEEK!
also, we are rolling out our new tournament format with a Sunday 25 chip HU Shootout that I have been playing each weekend. It's pretty cool / check out a small upgrade which paves the path for bigger ones.
October 04, 2014, 05:23:23 PM
Thank you NotSerp!
October 04, 2014, 12:02:27 PM
Im still having trouble finding the person on here who was posting in this thread who was offering the bonus chips for signing up with his referral code.
Anyone please help me out and point me in his direction?
Anyone please help me out and point me in his direction?
i know this guy https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bonus-up-to-100-chips-for-new-players-sealswithclubs-214613 was but i dont know if hes still doing it
October 04, 2014, 10:46:49 AM
Im still having trouble finding the person on here who was posting in this thread who was offering the bonus chips for signing up with his referral code.
Anyone please help me out and point me in his direction?
Anyone please help me out and point me in his direction?
October 04, 2014, 05:16:39 AM
I'd love to join to a big tournament, what do you think guys? is there a chance to a tournament?
What's "big" to you?- On Wednesday at 9:39 (CT) the host the Donkdown, a freeroll which usually gets 200-300+ players.
- The 54 Player SNG Freeroll which is always a 54 player tournament (it starts when it's full, and typically resets shortly after it ends)
- Their 1 chip 50 GTD typically has ~50+ people in it.
- I've seen a 1 chip 100 GTD (may no longer exist) which got 70+ players
- They also have "krill" tournaments (krill is a rakeback currency) which I've seen get 100-200+ players
October 04, 2014, 02:22:37 AM
I'd love to join to a big tournament, what do you think guys? is there a chance to a tournament?
October 04, 2014, 01:08:14 AM
SwC actively monitors for collusion.
Every now and then a few posters make broad statements on forums like "collusion is everywhere" yet give no specifics.
If you suspect players(s) are colluding, post it publicly or email [email protected]. We actively police the games and have for years. It is one of our primary jobs as a bitcoin poker site.
It seems baseless to accuse collusion without an HH or usernames.
Every now and then a few posters make broad statements on forums like "collusion is everywhere" yet give no specifics.
If you suspect players(s) are colluding, post it publicly or email [email protected]. We actively police the games and have for years. It is one of our primary jobs as a bitcoin poker site.
It seems baseless to accuse collusion without an HH or usernames.
username realbasit banned by your site with 45 chips no reply to mail looks like support is dead if u can process the cashout,,,,,,,
October 04, 2014, 12:59:07 AM
SwC actively monitors for collusion.
Every now and then a few posters make broad statements on forums like "collusion is everywhere" yet give no specifics.
If you suspect players(s) are colluding, post it publicly or email [email protected]. We actively police the games and have for years. It is one of our primary jobs as a bitcoin poker site.
It seems baseless to accuse collusion without an HH or usernames.
Every now and then a few posters make broad statements on forums like "collusion is everywhere" yet give no specifics.
If you suspect players(s) are colluding, post it publicly or email [email protected]. We actively police the games and have for years. It is one of our primary jobs as a bitcoin poker site.
It seems baseless to accuse collusion without an HH or usernames.
October 04, 2014, 12:52:40 AM
How can you make such a large generalization when you just "walked away up $80"? Sounds like you've only played poker once or twice, $80 isn't really anything in the long run. I don't play online often but I cash in about 70% of tournaments I enter in at casinos, your statement just leads me to believe you lost a bunch of money and you're looking for something to blame it on. The best way to avoid being cheated is to not play online poker.
Actually I shouldn't have brought numbers into it. I only said that so people _wouldn't_ assume what you went ahead and assumed anyway.
But I agree with your last sentence 100%.
October 04, 2014, 12:19:25 AM
Personally, no I don't worry about it. Sometimes I've ended up playing the same 5 people on a few different tables at the same time.
That's just what happens when everyone wants to play more than one table at a time to get more hands in.
I can understand watching for collusion... but I've never felt like I was being colluded against. And if they are they're very bad at it.
That's just what happens when everyone wants to play more than one table at a time to get more hands in.
I can understand watching for collusion... but I've never felt like I was being colluded against. And if they are they're very bad at it.
In general, bitcoiners are bad poker players. I walked away up at least $80 and don't plan on returning because even though hackers are bad poker players, they still have the upper hand by cheating.
I'm willing to bet you are one of the people who is involved in collusion on the site otherwise you wouldn't be so pro-cheater.
Alright, I was actually tryin to help you out and answer your question but I guess you already have your mind made up.
Good luck.
October 03, 2014, 07:31:48 PM
Personally, no I don't worry about it. Sometimes I've ended up playing the same 5 people on a few different tables at the same time.
That's just what happens when everyone wants to play more than one table at a time to get more hands in.
I can understand watching for collusion... but I've never felt like I was being colluded against. And if they are they're very bad at it.
That's just what happens when everyone wants to play more than one table at a time to get more hands in.
I can understand watching for collusion... but I've never felt like I was being colluded against. And if they are they're very bad at it.
In general, bitcoiners are bad poker players. I walked away up at least $80 and don't plan on returning because even though hackers are bad poker players, they still have the upper hand by cheating.
I'm willing to bet you are one of the people who is involved in collusion on the site otherwise you wouldn't be so pro-cheater.
How can you make such a large generalization when you just "walked away up $80"? Sounds like you've only played poker once or twice, $80 isn't really anything in the long run. I don't play online often but I cash in about 70% of tournaments I enter in at casinos, your statement just leads me to believe you lost a bunch of money and you're looking for something to blame it on. The best way to avoid being cheated is to not play online poker.
If you cash in 70% of tournaments, you should.go.pro, since not even.pros cash that much in mtts.
I just started playing in casino tournaments about two months ago. Before that it was just the occasional online playing or playing with family. The tourneys are normally 25-50 people so they're not as big as the ones the pros play in.
October 03, 2014, 07:25:30 PM
Personally, no I don't worry about it. Sometimes I've ended up playing the same 5 people on a few different tables at the same time.
That's just what happens when everyone wants to play more than one table at a time to get more hands in.
I can understand watching for collusion... but I've never felt like I was being colluded against. And if they are they're very bad at it.
That's just what happens when everyone wants to play more than one table at a time to get more hands in.
I can understand watching for collusion... but I've never felt like I was being colluded against. And if they are they're very bad at it.
In general, bitcoiners are bad poker players. I walked away up at least $80 and don't plan on returning because even though hackers are bad poker players, they still have the upper hand by cheating.
I'm willing to bet you are one of the people who is involved in collusion on the site otherwise you wouldn't be so pro-cheater.
How can you make such a large generalization when you just "walked away up $80"? Sounds like you've only played poker once or twice, $80 isn't really anything in the long run. I don't play online often but I cash in about 70% of tournaments I enter in at casinos, your statement just leads me to believe you lost a bunch of money and you're looking for something to blame it on. The best way to avoid being cheated is to not play online poker.
If you cash in 70% of tournaments, you should.go.pro, since not even.pros cash that much in mtts.
October 03, 2014, 07:21:45 PM
Personally, no I don't worry about it. Sometimes I've ended up playing the same 5 people on a few different tables at the same time.
That's just what happens when everyone wants to play more than one table at a time to get more hands in.
I can understand watching for collusion... but I've never felt like I was being colluded against. And if they are they're very bad at it.
That's just what happens when everyone wants to play more than one table at a time to get more hands in.
I can understand watching for collusion... but I've never felt like I was being colluded against. And if they are they're very bad at it.
In general, bitcoiners are bad poker players. I walked away up at least $80 and don't plan on returning because even though hackers are bad poker players, they still have the upper hand by cheating.
I'm willing to bet you are one of the people who is involved in collusion on the site otherwise you wouldn't be so pro-cheater.
How can you make such a large generalization when you just "walked away up $80"? Sounds like you've only played poker once or twice, $80 isn't really anything in the long run. I don't play online often but I cash in about 70% of tournaments I enter in at casinos, your statement just leads me to believe you lost a bunch of money and you're looking for something to blame it on. The best way to avoid being cheated is to not play online poker.
October 03, 2014, 06:25:12 PM
Personally, no I don't worry about it. Sometimes I've ended up playing the same 5 people on a few different tables at the same time.
That's just what happens when everyone wants to play more than one table at a time to get more hands in.
I can understand watching for collusion... but I've never felt like I was being colluded against. And if they are they're very bad at it.
That's just what happens when everyone wants to play more than one table at a time to get more hands in.
I can understand watching for collusion... but I've never felt like I was being colluded against. And if they are they're very bad at it.
In general, bitcoiners are bad poker players. I walked away up at least $80 and don't plan on returning because even though hackers are bad poker players, they still have the upper hand by cheating.
I'm willing to bet you are one of the people who is involved in collusion on the site otherwise you wouldn't be so pro-cheater.
October 03, 2014, 06:05:19 PM
Can someone recommend some competitor sites that don't allow multiple logons from 1 IP or allow multiple players to play at multiple tables together?
I agree that multiple people from the same IP address shouldn't be able to sit at the same ring game table. I think that's standard.
But in 10+ years of playing online I can't remember ever seeing a site that didn't allow you to play against the same opponent at multiple tables.
That's just what happens when you multi-table... you end up seeing some of the same people at different tables.
When its fake money, its fine. When its real money, its cheating.
Wouldn't you want to just assume these people are colluding for your own safety? It seems like a no-brainer to not play at a site for this very reason. I will wait until there is more competition.
Personally, no I don't worry about it. Sometimes I've ended up playing the same 5 people on a few different tables at the same time.
That's just what happens when everyone wants to play more than one table at a time to get more hands in.
I can understand watching for collusion... but I've never felt like I was being colluded against. And if they are they're very bad at it.
But it's your decision, if you don't feel comfortable then you shouldn't play. And if you do and suspect collusion you should report it.
I'm not sure if you'll be able to find a site you're describing though. Even real money sites like Pokerstars or regulated US sites allow people to play against eachother at multiple tables.
October 03, 2014, 02:42:58 PM
Can someone recommend some competitor sites that don't allow multiple logons from 1 IP or allow multiple players to play at multiple tables together?
I agree that multiple people from the same IP address shouldn't be able to sit at the same ring game table. I think that's standard.
But in 10+ years of playing online I can't remember ever seeing a site that didn't allow you to play against the same opponent at multiple tables.
That's just what happens when you multi-table... you end up seeing some of the same people at different tables.
When its fake money, its fine. When its real money, its cheating.
Wouldn't you want to just assume these people are colluding for your own safety? It seems like a no-brainer to not play at a site for this very reason. I will wait until there is more competition.
Jump to: