SEC tightens the noose on ICO-funded startups

Bonsaiav

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 118

I'm very enthusiastic and support the SEC's performance steps, in managing and regulating the trading market, especially in the field of cryptonization that we are currently in In my opinion, what the SEC is doing is one form of attentiveness, especially for users of cryptocurrencies who are vulnerable to lose due to the actions of manipulators.

Quote from: spongegar on November 20, 2018, 11:07:59 PM

I think this is a good mobe by the SEC. As it is, ICOs are having a bad rep in the crypto currency market that more and more ICOs ended up being a crap coin and investors are holding the short end of the stick. I think more regulations would make ICOs more effective to put up money to make the coin survive.

Not only that, the performance of the SEC agency is worthy of our appreciation especially in eradicating several ICO projects that are considered irrelevant to the interests of many people, I think there are many modus operandi carried out by ICO developers, not even a few who embezzled funds customers.

spongegar

full member

Activity: 476

Merit: 100

I think this is a good mobe by the SEC. As it is, ICOs are having a bad rep in the crypto currency market that more and more ICOs ended up being a crap coin and investors are holding the short end of the stick. I think more regulations would make ICOs more effective to put up money to make the coin survive.

Lotermity91

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

Quote from: Ctn on October 26, 2018, 02:40:20 PM

I am dam sure that it is all about the USA only or any ICO that was programmed to run in the USA. Because they can not really regulate the ICO which are formed within different countries as they have no authority to do so. Apart from that I see that most of the ICO's are coming from the outside of US only and they do mention that US people are not allowed to participate in it. May be this is because the concerns of SEC that are always going on in the US country itself. So I think its none of our concern if we are outside US. SEC is already being hard a** on crypto and they will keep on doing this.

Of course it is only ICO's that are based in USA but that is actually enough to make them regulative governmental program. If you want to look more legit I would suggest any ICO that feels like they are doing the right thing and not after scamming people and based in USA to not run away somewhere else and just stay their grounds and open their business in USA with SEC regulations followed strictly so it would tell everyone who wants to invest to their ICO how legit they are and not aiming to run away with their money. If I see a new ICO coming up from somewhere like nicaragua but the office is in UK and if I see a new ICO in silicon valley and opened the business in Silicon Valley following all rules which one do you think I would prefer to invest into? Definitely the one with proper papers are making it easier to invest in them.

alonelyorange

member

Activity: 532

Merit: 10

SEC have bad reputation where make many ico have ended early, I can feel how ico centra project have die after faced problem with SEC team, when centra listing at exchange market have $5 price but with SEC problem now their coin have scam and die.

hatshepsut93

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 2162

Quote from: Buttermellow on November 03, 2018, 03:20:52 AM

I consider it good news because ICO project will be put to limit and will be less likely to do scam. I hope SEC will consider it to implement the regulations to all over the nations so as ICO scam will stop. It seems some ICO's do not really imolement the project instead just put it to an exchange. This must be regulated and put to end. Many cryptos now were undervalue because they were no real project to be found.

The SEC is American regulator, they have no power over other countries, it's up to local governments to deal with ICO's. Although other nations might just copy SEC's framework for regulating ICO's to avoid the hassle of developing their own. Or maybe they won't even bother to do it, because ICO's are dying anyway, and governments seem to generally not give much attention to online scams.

magneto

hero member

Activity: 1666

Merit: 753

Quote

Essentially what the SEC has done here is limit ICOs from being sold to the poor, which is one of the main initiatives that fueled its growth in the 1st place.

It definitely doesn't make sense to me why they would want to do this.

Sure, you could argue that people with more of a net worth would be able to make better decisions with their money, but if they were investing in regulated ICOs that have been screened, who cares if lower income workers invests in that? It's their money ultimately. If anything, this is an obvious attempt to try and restrict access to these investments and to discourage ICOs from starting in the first place.

But as you said, it is very geographically limited and we've already seen tons of crowdfunded projects in the past not offer their products to the US and China, so not really surprising.

Buttermellow

member

Activity: 462

Merit: 14

I consider it good news because ICO project will be put to limit and will be less likely to do scam. I hope SEC will consider it to implement the regulations to all over the nations so as ICO scam will stop. It seems some ICO's do not really imolement the project instead just put it to an exchange. This must be regulated and put to end. Many cryptos now were undervalue because they were no real project to be found.

frowsiter

sr. member

Activity: 714

Merit: 261

What do you mean by this article? Only people with net worth of 1 million USD are allowed to take participation in the ICO's? Really is that even true or possible to happen in the near future. I mean whats the strategy behind this, make poor more poor and rich people richest Huh

Looks like I smell worst regulation to come in effect. But I dont understand one thing here, how come they can regulate it if the investors can invest money via blockchain with anonymous nature and have no issues putting their money. May be I am taking the whole thing in other way around but SEC is devil here. Shocked

Sama517

jr. member

Activity: 196

Merit: 1

This fresh decision of SEC may have a bad effect on ICOs. It means some ICOs may run forever without been able to get complete. Even the small contributions of $100 from the low income earners also counts. It helps to make the ICO complete faster.

richmcrich

hero member

Activity: 1120

Merit: 507

Quote from: tweetbit on October 23, 2018, 05:20:38 PM

Quote from: Idrisu on October 23, 2018, 09:11:33 AM

I believe blockchain technology is freedom and we have to support this freedom from government and financial regulatory agency.

I seconded, but the reality is so different from our expectations. We are living in a society that is governed by too much greedy and inconsiderable humans in the position. If SEC isn't used for this controlling agency's and pressured from the banking sectors then the intention can be taken lightly for ICO’s investor protection.

Blockchain means FREEDOM

This has always been the reasons why a lot of people have been skeptical with what regulation is going to end up bringing and now that there is a huge limitation making ICOs only applicable to those who are rich, that is going to be messing up everything, However, one thing is that this is a global space and even if I have a great idea, i obviously just need to go pitch my idea in a very different environment that is friendly with ICOs I guess.

That is what I see with the freedom that the space brings and that is one thing I know no matter what some government or SEC may want to be doing, there will always be a room for most people globally.

figmentofmyass

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1483

Quote from: jseverson on October 24, 2018, 03:11:52 AM

Quote from: figmentofmyass on October 23, 2018, 05:46:57 PM

at the end of the day: do you need the nanny state telling you what you can invest in? people should be able to avoid scams on their own. caveat emptor and all.

I completely agree with this, but I feel like the problem is how ICOs have been getting away with outright scamming scot-free. I don't mind making gullible people pay for their lessons, but at the same time, crime shouldn't pay.

The US is probably facing difficulties with persecution considering the nature of ICOs, so they're gatekeeping instead.

any ICOs that operate from the USA or have bank accounts in the western world are under threat from the SEC. they've been freezing/seizing assets from ICO operators for over a year now, like these two: https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2017-185-0

or this one: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/30/sec-halts-one-of-the-largest-icos-ever.html

i'm guessing that seeing ICO operators getting bank accounts frozen is a big deterrent to people who are thinking of dodging SEC registration requirements or outright scamming. the hundreds of subpoenas they've sent out since last year have probably had a chilling effect too. it'll be interesting to see what happens to this guy if he keeps trying to dodge their subpoenas: https://www.coindesk.com/sec-asks-court-to-enforce-subpoena-in-ico-inquiry/

so yeah, i think their presence might benefit gullible investors. i just don't feel that bad for pigeons throwing their money away at ICO scams. if it weren't an ICO taking their money, it would be something else. these people are helpless. Undecided

Bitfling

member

Activity: 602

Merit: 10

I think its good for investor if SEC looking on ICOs. I am believe it will reducing market from scam ICOs and secure investor money from being scammed.

Moonmanmun

jr. member

Activity: 243

Merit: 9

Good its about time someone took a look at all of these scam start up ICOs.
As if there isnt enough damage already done but its better to stop it before more people lose out on there money.

Ctn

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 259

I am dam sure that it is all about the USA only or any ICO that was programmed to run in the USA. Because they can not really regulate the ICO which are formed within different countries as they have no authority to do so. Apart from that I see that most of the ICO's are coming from the outside of US only and they do mention that US people are not allowed to participate in it. May be this is because the concerns of SEC that are always going on in the US country itself. So I think its none of our concern if we are outside US. SEC is already being hard a** on crypto and they will keep on doing this.

Gabali126

jr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 2

Quote from: Hydrogen on October 11, 2018, 04:44:23 AM

The biggest development here appears to be the SEC limiting ICO token purchases to only accredited investors who make more than $100k per year or have a net worth of $1 million usd.

2nd biggest development is this form of regulation cracking down on ICOs likely only taking place inside the united states. Europe, asia, africa and other nations will probably get a free pass with these limits only being imposed upon americans.

The media claims this regulation will increase growth. We could see the opposite with ICOs now being restricted from selling tokens to lower income demographics. Essentially what the SEC has done here is limit ICOs from being sold to the poor, which is one of the main initiatives that fueled its growth in the 1st place.

I think this is not really fair to the low income earners. This is going to frustrate some people out of the exciting crypto community who may not be able to afford such high money to invest in ICOs.

cryptocurrencyguru

member

Activity: 280

Merit: 11

Sec should form a ico start-up guidelines so that icos can innovate in crypto space forcing icos to close and giving cease and deceit orders will kill the blockchain industry at large

tomahawk9

hero member

Activity: 2086

Merit: 994

Cats on Mars

Quote from: avikz on October 23, 2018, 10:24:33 AM

It's true that we have seen many scam ICOs in past few years, but we have also seen a number of successful ICOs at the same time. So calling all ICOs bad, would not solve any purpose, instead we will have to educate ourselves to differentiate between good and bad. That will help us in long term!

This is true, but as long as there's no regulatory framework in place taking care of those scam ICOs, people will keep pouring tons of capital on projects with vague ideas with no legitimate purpose to even exist. Some people are simply way too ignorant and lazy to even make a proper research about an ICO, as long as it promises a ROI, people will keep "investing" in the first ICO they see.

Hopefully, what SEC is doing will serve as an example to other countries where scam ICOs are completely free to do what their do.

Osayo

jr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 1

Honestly speaking, I support this move. I may not have such huge amount of money to invest in ICOs, but I think it will make the cryptocurrency more serious with the big guys coming in. This will likely fuel competition too among the rich and also encourage growth.

Ladysmith

member

Activity: 179

Merit: 16

This goes against the major benefits of decentralization, them being equal opportunity and true democracy.

This isn't surprising though, this keeps the wealth gap as it is. They come across as caring about whether or not people get scammed, but they're really scared about having more competition once the poor have a chance to become rich.

rickadone

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1024

This is a great news for all of us that wants to invest into any ICO however it would probably only true for american ICO's and basically nothing would change for the global ones. Yes the idea is that if SEC really takes a look at the ICO's we invest we could definitely find out which ones are scam and which ones are legit and that way we could definitely invest into stuff we trust much more with a SEC approval and that would ease our minds.

However, the trouble is two fold, one is you can still be a legit company and than scam people and get away with it, this is crypto I am sure there will still be some loopholes somewhere that would allow them to do it, even tho harder while SEC is looking but still doable. Second trouble is the other countries like I said, if a scammer realizes SEC is looking he can start his company in some other country like Malta or Estonia or whatever and get away with it.

Topic: SEC tightens the noose on ICO-funded startups (Read 409 times)