Topic: Sending in fake ID for KYC - page 29. (Read 89379 times)
I still see no reason anyone should call that a bad action because sending in your real identity information is really bad to be sincere, with all the the scam project out there belive me non of your information sent online is safe, they can easily sell them to scamers. And who do you blame for the actions when you have done several of them
I agree and believe that such cheaters need to be detected and eliminated from all further projects. I do not want to share my rewards with somebody that has not confirm his identity. We need to find a way to fix this because people would you it to cheat hunters, ICO investors and all other participants.
I believe they no capacity to determine if the ID submitted is legitimate, they just require it as it's part of the procedure but the liability lies on the KYC applicant, if they will send fake ID, there is a risk that they maybe liable in the future, so if you want to have no problem in the future, comply honestly.
But, there is but.... make sure you trust the project your are investing so your real identity will be safe.
But, there is but.... make sure you trust the project your are investing so your real identity will be safe.
The fact is that sending your personal data does not guarantee reward. And I understand people who fake their data and send fake. This is a smart move. We cannot be 100% sure that our data, in the wrong hands, will not cause us any damage.
Unfortunately once I did mistake of completing KYC for one airdrop (I know that's dumb thing to do), I hope I'll be safe.
Can you really blame them? People have gone lengths to ensure they keep carrying out identity thefts all in the name of KYCs. This same information is being sold on the dark Web exposing people to attacks knowing or unknowingly. To be guided against this, people now go as far as, designing fake IDs to ensure they are safe against this issue of theft. This has led to situations where they now have to embrace the option of fake IDs.
Some projects do not have any way of testing thoroughly.
I used to wonder how so e people usually agree to do kyc, while so many people are declining doing it. Some of them might even ask the team for kyc and that baffles me.
It was later that I discovered that some of them use fake IDs and will not hesitate to go for just any project for kyc, even if is scam.
I used to wonder how so e people usually agree to do kyc, while so many people are declining doing it. Some of them might even ask the team for kyc and that baffles me.
It was later that I discovered that some of them use fake IDs and will not hesitate to go for just any project for kyc, even if is scam.
I think that almost KYC systems now is verify by Automated system. So the Fake ID for KYC will easy pass their KYC system. If they can check one by one and by their staff, The Fake KYC will be rejected and fair for real user.
they don't seem to check all the KYC's that come in their data. and they only collect data. if so, it's better to send fake data than the original data. but, have you sent fake data and passed the check? it seems difficult to trick even with Photoshop.
Un-necessary demanded of KYC implementation have force many people to send fake KYC doc. Especially the bounty hunter when there's un announce KYC and the hunter do not have the required doc to provide,
The two party should just take it in good faith.
The two party should just take it in good faith.
Everyone decides for himself whether to upload his documents or not, but one must fight against deception and invent methods to combat false documents.
I don't this is a good idea. Faking something is not really my thing. We all know that if we invest on something and it requires KYC then we have to decide first before investing or joining a campaign program. Our responsibility is to abide the rules that was implemented, if others chose to fake then they are ready to take the risk as well as when we give our true identity, we should take the risk also.
Your topic brought an interesting question to the surface.
I'm not advocating sending fake documents, but doing so during the bounty campaign (and before the ICO) can show you how capable the team is of avoiding scams and doing quality work. If they catch you - they're doing a fine job. If you actually make it with fake documents - they're amateurs.
I'm not advocating sending fake documents, but doing so during the bounty campaign (and before the ICO) can show you how capable the team is of avoiding scams and doing quality work. If they catch you - they're doing a fine job. If you actually make it with fake documents - they're amateurs.
You can send fake documents, of course, but I don't think it can work every time in every bounty company. But on the other hand, the procedure of KYC is not clear to me, because I do not understand how they check people. Are they watching everyone or maybe just someone randomly selected and that's it?
I don't fancy the idea of people sending in fake IDs for KYC, it is total cheat to those that sends in their real document and the most annoying part is that both those that submitted real and fake IDs receives exactly the same reward
I didnt know KYC registration has gotten to this extent, where fake identity are submitted to hide information from project team. i dont believe there is any reason to justify atrocities, not everyone will do this under this same circumstances. Investment is not also compulsory if it lures anyone to criminal acts. I also think ICO team should be subjected to lawsuit for carelessly revealing people information to encourage submission of genuine
Am not a fan of KYC but I don't either support submitting fake document, it then means you actually have something to hide. If you ain't comfortable with submitting your documents I think the best is to stay clear of the project
I really have never understand that why the projects ask for our informations? I am sure that there are millions of KYC running around right now and i don't know whom making profit with it.. The blockchain and the cryptocurrency system had a mystery which i loved in first place but then i had to send my passport, mobile number and my home address bill too many times to the projects. I wish there would be no problem with that in the future..
The impression is that some states deliberately came up with a KYC check to turn people away from cryptocurrency. If we pay in cash, we remain anonymous, and in cryptocurrency, which should be anonymous in nature, we leave our data everywhere.On the issue of providing my own data to ICO projects, I fully admit it for several reasons.
Firstly, I generally think that KYC checks against bounty hunters are illegal. None of the ICO teams showed no reason why they require bounty hunters to undergo KYC testing.
Secondly, I do not think that the right to collect such information should be given to those who themselves do not undergo any verification, and even if there is such a high level of fraud among them.
I hope to have a new method to replace KYC, to ensure the safety of information for everyone, as well as to prevent frauds.
That is the point, why am I supporting the idea with video KYC verification. It is much more faster and takes 5 minutes. After that your account is verified and you are secured. It makes much more sense and helps to avoid such things.
Jump to: