Topic: Sending in fake ID for KYC - page 32. (Read 89379 times)
I think the best thing to prevent that is to have the KYC verifier hold the full paper record, project name and signature. Often the web KYC simply take passport capture sefli is finished so easily pass the KYC test.
Sometimes I feel very disturbed with the presence of KYC, the reason is the same as what you said,a lot of people cheat. Even if we do protest I think until now cheating is still done primarily for airdrop-based exchanger. They like selling the data themselves only for the money. Our consciousness about the security of the data themselves is still lacking and even they use data other people they don't feel guilty at all.
Honestly, don't care for them, as long as you are complying with the strict rules and guidelines. It is their fault when their investment will be put to hold or even worst to be invalidate if found that their documents were faked.
be careful in using kyc, because now there are so many scam projects, Be careful, they seem to have very good projects. but after they get investors and are not responsible. they don't care how people help him in his project
Example, If I remember correctly, when "bitconnect" was rolling out with debit cards system, they (scammer) asked their user for some person information (name, address, maybe phone number) for the debit card. If you are not comfortable with KYC, just wait for the coin to be listed on exchange.
be careful in using kyc, because now there are so many scam projects, Be careful, they seem to have very good projects. but after they get investors and are not responsible. they don't care how people help him in his project
Sending your personal identification was a very risk decision, especially if the project campaign or the exchange asking for it. But this will depend on your trust or beliefs of course. However, sending any fake documents for the KYC was an equivalent of offense or falsification of documents either. So the better things for us is that we need to make sure about the project or exchange if it is reputable or trusted one before we send our documents as well.
It must be assumed that the requirement for bounty hunters to be tested by KYC is generally illegal. This check is carried out mainly for the purpose of prevention of possible laundering of dirty money. At the same time, the ICO team itself simply has to save this data in case certain government agencies request data for specific individuals. The ICO teams themselves have not yet been duly tested and among them there is a large percentage of scammers. Therefore, it is very dangerous to transfer our data to them. Based on this, I fully allow the transfer of non-personal data to them.
KYC was basically implemented for good purposes but it was very ironic when the testers were not tested at all, in fact only a few people who did dirty money laundering and more ICOs were fraudulent so I think those who should give KYC are teams from the ICO so there is no scamI just was brought up to speed on groups of people sending in fake/Photoshopped ID's by scanning public records to defeat the KYC process and it seemingly is very easy to do. It appears that many people sent in fake documentation to the Bob's and Polymath KYC and had no hassles. How do these companies verify people if all they have to go on is public information? Did they even really check the ID's or were they simply collected the data? How rampant do you think this is? How many of us are complete fools for turning in our documents when others simply faked it. Now they have our data and the people who faked it are still secure.
NOT FAIR.
I am not surprised of the success of those people who send in fake documents. After all, nothing is really been verified. NOT FAIR.
I think that there is no injustice, just someone thought of it. Personally, I've never had a KYC. I think that this loophole will be eliminated, so do not worry.
This is because the agency is lacking professionalism in carrying out the data verification process because as long as I fill in the data, the Kyc does not ask for a mobile number that allows the agency to verify by code.
It must be assumed that the requirement for bounty hunters to be tested by KYC is generally illegal. This check is carried out mainly for the purpose of prevention of possible laundering of dirty money. At the same time, the ICO team itself simply has to save this data in case certain government agencies request data for specific individuals. The ICO teams themselves have not yet been duly tested and among them there is a large percentage of scammers. Therefore, it is very dangerous to transfer our data to them. Based on this, I fully allow the transfer of non-personal data to them.
KYC was basically implemented for good purposes but it was very ironic when the testers were not tested at all, in fact only a few people who did dirty money laundering and more ICOs were fraudulent so I think those who should give KYC are teams from the ICO so there is no scam
Kyc is one of the great tools that will make cryptocurrency well adopted because people will fell safe kind of .But most people in cryptocurrency do not really accept the idea of passing KYC so some people will try to avoid it altogether or use a fake identity so that they cannot be traced .
I just was brought up to speed on groups of people sending in fake/Photoshopped ID's by scanning public records to defeat the KYC process and it seemingly is very easy to do. It appears that many people sent in fake documentation to the Bob's and Polymath KYC and had no hassles. How do these companies verify people if all they have to go on is public information? Did they even really check the ID's or were they simply collected the data? How rampant do you think this is? How many of us are complete fools for turning in our documents when others simply faked it. Now they have our data and the people who faked it are still secure.
NOT FAIR.
NOT FAIR.
I doubt that to do so is a good idea, if you are contributing to the project, then, first of all, you trust it with your money and hopefully, your documents will be safe.
I got a good example when KYC helped my friend. When he contributed to Centra Tech, the NYC court found his details and put him into the collective statement... That is a big advantage, secondly, faking your documents may cause you some big problems.
This Incident has happened happens in not only Polymath or Bobs, Rather This Fake and photoshopped ID, documents are also accepting in every project's KYC. I have been seeing many ICO projects bounty campaign Since January, In every KYC, bounty hunters or investors submitted fake KYC documents and the project team couldn't verify the fake documents. ICOsid is a very popular website to perform as a KYC supplier but people submit fake ID card on ICOSID too in Shivom Bounty. So, This will be continue as i see
then after someone else faked their identity for KYC, then you want to follow those who cheated? in my opinion when other people cheat, you should never give up, and remember if you are hesitant to do KYC process on some bounties or airdrops, it is better not to do it, sometimes not just developers who often feel disadvantaged, but many bounty participants or airdrops are trapped to do the KYC process and after that their data is sold on the black market
I concur. When you enter a "photograph of an international ID" in Google, numerous photographs show up. A few people send them. In questionable airdrops and ISO, I don't fill in the KYc, in those that intrigue me, I'll send my information. It additionally appears to me that the KYC method does not compare to the idea of "privacy".
It would not be a good idea to send in any kind of fake information to people in charge of the ICO's, what if they need to meet with you?also it can be misused for laundering money since the point of KYC is to prevent any form ofmoney laundering
I concur. When you enter a "photograph of an international ID" in Google, numerous photographs show up. A few people send them. In questionable airdrops and ISO, I don't fill in the KYc, in those that intrigue me, I'll send my information. It additionally appears to me that the KYC method does not compare to the idea of "privacy".
It would not be a good idea to send in any kind of fake information to people in charge of the ICO's, what if they need to meet with you? I just was brought up to speed on groups of people sending in fake/Photoshopped ID's by scanning public records to defeat the KYC process and it seemingly is very easy to do. It appears that many people sent in fake documentation to the Bob's and Polymath KYC and had no hassles. How do these companies verify people if all they have to go on is public information? Did they even really check the ID's or were they simply collected the data? How rampant do you think this is? How many of us are complete fools for turning in our documents when others simply faked it. Now they have our data and the people who faked it are still secure.
NOT FAIR.
NOT FAIR.
Actually it is very impossible to collect all information of a man to create a fake ID card unless they physically stolen all information of an ID card. On the other hand they may serve a campaign and collect all information from customer with this campaign. Everything is possible who has a negative intention about a matter. Until that KYC is very important to catch false account.
Once I passed KYC. At the end of the bounty, the company announced the need for KYC, and I was sorry for the work done. Now I'm regret about that.
A fake ID for KYC is a good idea, but it’s better to refuse a few dollars and save privacy.
A fake ID for KYC is a good idea, but it’s better to refuse a few dollars and save privacy.
If i's just a bounty and not a large investment I see the point using fake IDs, especially if they change rules and require KYC at the end of the bounty. Most do this with a dark motivation anyway, speculating that a large part just won't bother with it and they keep the rewards for themself.
I think most people would send some else's identification on KYCs since it is really dangerous to send your details on KYC just to get your bounties. I think this is not illegal as long as you have their permission to use their document. I believe most bounty hunters or even investors do this to protect their identity.
Jump to: