Senior Member legendster's Multimedia Services - page 2.

james.lent

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:41:23 PM

Quote from: Panthers52 on February 28, 2016, 10:33:56 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:21:09 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 10:16:31 PM

Quote from: Panthers52 on February 28, 2016, 10:15:14 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:11:38 PM

So he should send you his source files? remove your negative trust at once

LOL. Why are you so strongly defending legendster? I have read up on a pretty good number of crazy views however this post makes it outright look like you are an alt of legendster Roll Eyes

Is this the case?

Even if legendster is exonerated of the allegations mentioned in the OP, he has a very sketchy past and I would not trade with him.

Kind Regards
Panthers52

Most likely he is.

Well if i were his alt you would be the first to know @panthers52 , after all, you are the expert at such matters

This thread isnt about his past so none of that cant be used when deciding on his trust ratings

I am good at finding alts, however I am unable to find everyone's alts, as some people are more careful then others. I am unable to locate any blockchain evidence that you and legendster are the same person.

My point above is that I believe legendster is a scammer, and I believe that negative trust is appropriate, even if the comments on his trust profile for the negative ratings are (potentially) inaccurate (if you were to assume that he is innocent of the allegations in the OP.

Another point is that legendster has a history of engaging in this kind of behavior.

Kind Regards
Panthers52

As said earlier, his previous ratings and past history should play no part in what is happening now

So i guess Theymos created that section so that we can post birthday greetings and it's nothing related to what he has done which would portray what kind of person he is. Thanks mate for the insightful info, now get back to your minecraft forums already.

Panthers52

hero member

Activity: 675

Merit: 502

#SuperBowl50 #NFCchamps

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:41:23 PM

As said earlier, his previous ratings and past history should play no part in what is happening now

That is crazy talk. If someone has a history of acting dishonestly, then people should have no problem believing that he is dishonest now. If someone has a history of trading honestly then people will have problems when there is a scam accusation against them. When someone has a history of scamming, then people should have no problem that they tried to scam again (or that they actually scammed again).

Kind Regards
Panthers52

Your Point Is Invalid

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 510

Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god

Quote from: Panthers52 on February 28, 2016, 10:33:56 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:21:09 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 10:16:31 PM

Quote from: Panthers52 on February 28, 2016, 10:15:14 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:11:38 PM

So he should send you his source files? remove your negative trust at once

LOL. Why are you so strongly defending legendster? I have read up on a pretty good number of crazy views however this post makes it outright look like you are an alt of legendster Roll Eyes

Is this the case?

Even if legendster is exonerated of the allegations mentioned in the OP, he has a very sketchy past and I would not trade with him.

Kind Regards
Panthers52

Most likely he is.

Well if i were his alt you would be the first to know @panthers52 , after all, you are the expert at such matters

This thread isnt about his past so none of that cant be used when deciding on his trust ratings

I am good at finding alts, however I am unable to find everyone's alts, as some people are more careful then others. I am unable to locate any blockchain evidence that you and legendster are the same person.

My point above is that I believe legendster is a scammer, and I believe that negative trust is appropriate, even if the comments on his trust profile for the negative ratings are (potentially) inaccurate (if you were to assume that he is innocent of the allegations in the OP.

Another point is that legendster has a history of engaging in this kind of behavior.

Kind Regards
Panthers52

As said earlier, his previous ratings and past history should play no part in what is happening now

Panthers52

hero member

Activity: 675

Merit: 502

#SuperBowl50 #NFCchamps

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:21:09 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 10:16:31 PM

Quote from: Panthers52 on February 28, 2016, 10:15:14 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:11:38 PM

So he should send you his source files? remove your negative trust at once

LOL. Why are you so strongly defending legendster? I have read up on a pretty good number of crazy views however this post makes it outright look like you are an alt of legendster Roll Eyes

Is this the case?

Even if legendster is exonerated of the allegations mentioned in the OP, he has a very sketchy past and I would not trade with him.

Kind Regards
Panthers52

Most likely he is.

Well if i were his alt you would be the first to know @panthers52 , after all, you are the expert at such matters

This thread isnt about his past so none of that cant be used when deciding on his trust ratings

I am good at finding alts, however I am unable to find everyone's alts, as some people are more careful then others. I am unable to locate any blockchain evidence that you and legendster are the same person.

My point above is that I believe legendster is a scammer, and I believe that negative trust is appropriate, even if the comments on his trust profile for the negative ratings are (potentially) inaccurate (if you were to assume that he is innocent of the allegations in the OP.

Another point is that legendster has a history of engaging in this kind of behavior.

Kind Regards
Panthers52

james.lent

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:28:26 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 10:22:14 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:21:09 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 10:16:31 PM

Quote from: Panthers52 on February 28, 2016, 10:15:14 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:11:38 PM

So he should send you his source files? remove your negative trust at once

LOL. Why are you so strongly defending legendster? I have read up on a pretty good number of crazy views however this post makes it outright look like you are an alt of legendster Roll Eyes

Is this the case?

Even if legendster is exonerated of the allegations mentioned in the OP, he has a very sketchy past and I would not trade with him.

Kind Regards
Panthers52

Most likely he is.

Well if i were his alt you would be the first to know @panthers52 , after all, you are the expert at such matters

This thread isnt about his past so none of that cant be used when deciding on his trust ratings

The he shouldnt have used those pics for his portfolio. Simple as that.

If the pics are his they are his, i dont know why he needs to go as far as proving his identity and handing over source codes, ave you traded with this user?

No one asked for the source codes fool. Learn to read before posting. Start posting with your brain and not your ass.

Your Point Is Invalid

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 510

Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 10:22:14 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:21:09 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 10:16:31 PM

Quote from: Panthers52 on February 28, 2016, 10:15:14 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:11:38 PM

So he should send you his source files? remove your negative trust at once

LOL. Why are you so strongly defending legendster? I have read up on a pretty good number of crazy views however this post makes it outright look like you are an alt of legendster Roll Eyes

Is this the case?

Even if legendster is exonerated of the allegations mentioned in the OP, he has a very sketchy past and I would not trade with him.

Kind Regards
Panthers52

Most likely he is.

Well if i were his alt you would be the first to know @panthers52 , after all, you are the expert at such matters

This thread isnt about his past so none of that cant be used when deciding on his trust ratings

The he shouldnt have used those pics for his portfolio. Simple as that.

If the pics are his they are his, i dont know why he needs to go as far as proving his identity and handing over source codes, ave you traded with this user?

james.lent

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:21:09 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 10:16:31 PM

Quote from: Panthers52 on February 28, 2016, 10:15:14 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:11:38 PM

So he should send you his source files? remove your negative trust at once

LOL. Why are you so strongly defending legendster? I have read up on a pretty good number of crazy views however this post makes it outright look like you are an alt of legendster Roll Eyes

Is this the case?

Even if legendster is exonerated of the allegations mentioned in the OP, he has a very sketchy past and I would not trade with him.

Kind Regards
Panthers52

Most likely he is.

Well if i were his alt you would be the first to know @panthers52 , after all, you are the expert at such matters

This thread isnt about his past so none of that cant be used when deciding on his trust ratings

The he shouldnt have used those pics for his portfolio. Simple as that.

Your Point Is Invalid

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 510

Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 10:16:31 PM

Quote from: Panthers52 on February 28, 2016, 10:15:14 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:11:38 PM

So he should send you his source files? remove your negative trust at once

LOL. Why are you so strongly defending legendster? I have read up on a pretty good number of crazy views however this post makes it outright look like you are an alt of legendster Roll Eyes

Is this the case?

Even if legendster is exonerated of the allegations mentioned in the OP, he has a very sketchy past and I would not trade with him.

Kind Regards
Panthers52

Most likely he is.

Well if i were his alt you would be the first to know @panthers52 , after all, you are the expert at such matters

This thread isnt about his past so none of that cant be used when deciding on his trust ratings

james.lent

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: Panthers52 on February 28, 2016, 10:15:14 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:11:38 PM

So he should send you his source files? remove your negative trust at once

LOL. Why are you so strongly defending legendster? I have read up on a pretty good number of crazy views however this post makes it outright look like you are an alt of legendster Roll Eyes

Is this the case?

Even if legendster is exonerated of the allegations mentioned in the OP, he has a very sketchy past and I would not trade with him.

Kind Regards
Panthers52

Most likely he is.

Panthers52

hero member

Activity: 675

Merit: 502

#SuperBowl50 #NFCchamps

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:11:38 PM

So he should send you his source files? remove your negative trust at once

LOL. Why are you so strongly defending legendster? I have read up on a pretty good number of crazy views however this post makes it outright look like you are an alt of legendster Roll Eyes

Is this the case?

Even if legendster is exonerated of the allegations mentioned in the OP, he has a very sketchy past and I would not trade with him.

Kind Regards
Panthers52

james.lent

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:11:38 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 10:09:04 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:06:16 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 10:02:49 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:59:25 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 09:56:42 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:53:16 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 09:51:44 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:49:55 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 09:46:59 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:43:33 PM

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about

I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.

You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

Quote

screenshot when its under the designing process or something

did i say 6 years ago ? Under designing process could also mean a recreation , or maybe he has the project saved. Not talking about the first pic in general, now stop trolling.

But, if he does have the skill to do this and he does create something and provides screenshots, how will that prove that he made the original pictures
simple-- (how will he prove he made the old pictures with new ones?)

Since he updated his portfolio recently with those pics, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13354700 , and if he's the original creator of those pics, then im sure he wont have an issue proving them.

But my question is how you think he is going to prove that he made the images, do you think he made screenshots halfway through his work?

Wtf, are you retarded or just trolling ? If he owns the image im sure he has the means to prove em. Every project has a source file. Like photoshop has .psd files. Source files is a must for 3d renderings as they're needed for edits/ touch-ups . Stop shilling

So he should send you his source files? remove your negative trust at once

No, as i've already stated, he can open that file, take a snapshot of his work and post it. Cant you read?

Your Point Is Invalid

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 510

Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 10:09:04 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:06:16 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 10:02:49 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:59:25 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 09:56:42 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:53:16 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 09:51:44 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:49:55 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 09:46:59 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:43:33 PM

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about

I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.

You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

Quote

screenshot when its under the designing process or something

did i say 6 years ago ? Under designing process could also mean a recreation , or maybe he has the project saved. Not talking about the first pic in general, now stop trolling.

But, if he does have the skill to do this and he does create something and provides screenshots, how will that prove that he made the original pictures
simple-- (how will he prove he made the old pictures with new ones?)

Since he updated his portfolio recently with those pics, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13354700 , and if he's the original creator of those pics, then im sure he wont have an issue proving them.

But my question is how you think he is going to prove that he made the images, do you think he made screenshots halfway through his work?

Wtf, are you retarded or just trolling ? If he owns the image im sure he has the means to prove em. Every project has a source file. Like photoshop has .psd files. Source files is a must for 3d renderings as they're needed for edits/ touch-ups . Stop shilling

So he should send you his source files? remove your negative trust at once

GSpgh

sr. member

Activity: 532

Merit: 302

Quote from: Panthers52 on February 28, 2016, 10:05:00 PM

It looks like the hero member 'Quickseller'

Kind Regards
Panthers52

Pathetic... Give up the socks already. You are tainting whatever point you may have.

james.lent

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:06:16 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 10:02:49 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:59:25 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 09:56:42 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:53:16 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 09:51:44 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:49:55 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 09:46:59 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:43:33 PM

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about

I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.

You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

Quote

screenshot when its under the designing process or something

did i say 6 years ago ? Under designing process could also mean a recreation , or maybe he has the project saved. Not talking about the first pic in general, now stop trolling.

But, if he does have the skill to do this and he does create something and provides screenshots, how will that prove that he made the original pictures
simple-- (how will he prove he made the old pictures with new ones?)

Since he updated his portfolio recently with those pics, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13354700 , and if he's the original creator of those pics, then im sure he wont have an issue proving them.

But my question is how you think he is going to prove that he made the images, do you think he made screenshots halfway through his work?

Wtf, are you retarded or just trolling ? If he owns the image im sure he has the means to prove em. Every project has a source file. Like photoshop has .psd files. Source files is a must for 3d renderings as they're needed for edits/ touch-ups . Stop shilling

Your Point Is Invalid

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 510

Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 10:02:49 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:59:25 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 09:56:42 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:53:16 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 09:51:44 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:49:55 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 09:46:59 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:43:33 PM

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about

I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.

You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

Quote

screenshot when its under the designing process or something

did i say 6 years ago ? Under designing process could also mean a recreation , or maybe he has the project saved. Not talking about the first pic in general, now stop trolling.

But, if he does have the skill to do this and he does create something and provides screenshots, how will that prove that he made the original pictures
simple-- (how will he prove he made the old pictures with new ones?)

Since he updated his portfolio recently with those pics, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13354700 , and if he's the original creator of those pics, then im sure he wont have an issue proving them.

But my question is how you think he is going to prove that he made the images, do you think he made screenshots halfway through his work?

GSpgh

sr. member

Activity: 532

Merit: 302

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:53:16 PM

You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

What are you on about... Nobody asked for original construction 6years ago you totally made that up. Reading comprehension fail. Just open the source file is basically what's being suggested. Maybe you should let the perp do their own shilling you're really bad at this lol.

Panthers52

hero member

Activity: 675

Merit: 502

#SuperBowl50 #NFCchamps

It looks like the hero member 'Quickseller' gave this person a negative rating over a year ago because he was trying to take out a 60 BTC loan while using a faucet as collateral Cheesy

It also looks like Legendary member 'johnniewalker' left this person a negative rating over similar issues as were described in the OP, as legendster was trying to sell a high end car, but to prove ownership of such cars he used pictures of cars being sold in Las Angeles while legendster was(is) located in India.

There also appears to be some level of controversy over the ratings that escrow.ms left for legendster as legendster purchased bitcoin from escrow.ms at above market value and ended up receiving two positive ratings from the deal, one from escrow.ms and one from Benson Samuel who has worked closely with escrow.ms in the past.

Kind Regards
Panthers52

james.lent

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:59:25 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 09:56:42 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:53:16 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 09:51:44 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:49:55 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 09:46:59 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:43:33 PM

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about

I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.

You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

Quote

screenshot when its under the designing process or something

did i say 6 years ago ? Under designing process could also mean a recreation , or maybe he has the project saved. Not talking about the first pic in general, now stop trolling.

But, if he does have the skill to do this and he does create something and provides screenshots, how will that prove that he made the original pictures
simple-- (how will he prove he made the old pictures with new ones?)

Since he updated his portfolio recently with those pics, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13354700 , and if he's the original creator of those pics, then im sure he wont have an issue proving them.

Your Point Is Invalid

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 510

Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 09:56:42 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:53:16 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 09:51:44 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:49:55 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 09:46:59 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:43:33 PM

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about

I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.

You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

Quote

screenshot when its under the designing process or something

did i say 6 years ago ? Under designing process could also mean a recreation , or maybe he has the project saved. Not talking about the first pic in general, now stop trolling.

But, if he does have the skill to do this and he does create something and provides screenshots, how will that prove that he made the original pictures
simple-- (how will he prove he made the old pictures with new ones?)

james.lent

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:53:16 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 09:51:44 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:49:55 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 09:46:59 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 09:43:33 PM

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about

I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.

You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

Quote

screenshot when its under the designing process or something

did i say 6 years ago ? Under designing process could also mean a recreation , or maybe he has the project saved. Not talking about the first pic in general, now stop trolling.

Topic: Senior Member legendster's Multimedia Services - page 2. (Read 2926 times)