Senior Member legendster's Multimedia Services - page 3.

Your Point Is Invalid

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 510

Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 10:51:44 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:49:55 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 10:46:59 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:43:33 PM

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about

I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.

You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

james.lent

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:49:55 PM

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 10:46:59 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:43:33 PM

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about

I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.

Your Point Is Invalid

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 510

Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god

Quote from: james.lent on February 28, 2016, 10:46:59 PM

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:43:33 PM

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about

Lutpin

copper member

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1874

Goodbye, Z.

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:43:33 PM

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity

No I don't. A simple message from Gilles Tran would be enough, I've made an example here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lutpin
or a blog post on his website:
http://www.oyonale.com/blog/
Both thinks would be enough as proof.

james.lent

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: Your Point Is Invalid on February 28, 2016, 10:43:33 PM

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.

Your Point Is Invalid

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 510

Dear me, I think I'm becoming a god

lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Lutpin

copper member

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1874

Goodbye, Z.

The image taken from wikipedia was created by Gilles Tran, if you can proof that identity, I'm ready to remove my negative trust.

Quote from: legendster on May 27, 2015, 05:59:05 PM

Remember I have been doing this since 2009 so yes my portfolio is much bigger than what I have posted here - which is just 3D stuff.

Funny, the picture you claimed to be made by yourself was Picture of the day in 2006.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Picture_of_the_day/August_2%2C_2006

james.lent

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

Quote from: actmyname on February 28, 2016, 10:27:41 PM

Not sure why he would do this if he was expecting people to pay for his services - once they see his REAL work, they would most likely bomb him with negative feedback (maybe he wanted them to send first?)

That would most likely be the intention he has.

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2510

Spear the bees

Seems stupid. He should have at the very least distorted the images a little bit so you couldn't do a reverse google image search. I'm sure that the images were simply stolen randomly. Looks like legendster just found the images and then slapped a watermark on it.

Not sure why he would do this if he was expecting people to pay for his services - once they see his REAL work, they would most likely bomb him with negative feedback (maybe he wanted them to send first?)

james.lent

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 501

What happened:: This member started a thread on the service section offering 3d rendering/modeling services. He has also 'updated his portfolio' which are actually random images grabbed from google and he slapped trademarks on them

Scammers Profile Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/legendster-93844

Reference Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/multimedia-services-legend-creatory-1072391
   Archived : https://web.archive.org/web/20160130051714/https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/multimedia-services-legend-creatory-1072391

Images source: first pic : https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datagrafikk / https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/Glasses_800_edit.png

   second pic : http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-0FBjowpxpxU/TjgX8-M0gbI/AAAAAAAAAEw/Bgf7nAR1xG4/s1600/Home-theatre.jpg

   third pic : http://s3images.coroflot.com/user_files/individual_files/407503_ZEl1NoCTwdYBpAVqUS1QckNtr.jpg

   fifth pic : http://www.offshorerenderingservices.com/images/architectural-samples/3d-interior-rendering-18.jpg

Slapping on a trademark on someone else's work doesn't make it yours. Only proves that you're out to scam.

edit: If you really did design them, then im sure you have no issue's proving it as maybe a screenshot when its under the designing process or something.

Topic: Senior Member legendster's Multimedia Services - page 3. (Read 2887 times)