Pages:
Author

Topic: Several users trying to cheat Coinomat signature campaign (Read 2861 times)

copper member
Activity: 3892
Merit: 2197
Verified awesomeness ✔
Nice catch you got there. I agree with everything you have said. People like that shouldn't be trusted and should be excluded from every signature campaign if you ask me.
global moderator
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2615
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Hilariousandco said "more people are abusing the campaign", but he only said my name in public. You can't say if I reported users abusing the campaign or not because the reports are not public, but the fact is hilarious don't say publicly other's peoples names, so I think there is a double standard(and as you said my word means nothing). Hilarious doesn't even notified me about this thread, giving me no chance of defense. He should open a thread about the coinomat signature abuse in general if

What the hell are you talking about? I haven't noticed any other users trying to cheat the coinomat campaign, just the ones mentioned in the op. There have been plenty of people making poor posts and this is exacerbated when they realise the op isn't keeping an eye on them, but I report them to coinomat and admins if appropriate and they're usually dealt with, but they're not scamming just spamming. Regardless of that, you need to stop trying to divert or pass blame on to others. This thread is about the accounts in the op that were caught abusing the campaign in a specific way in an attempt to get paid for posts they shouldn't have.

I don't see users banned for signature spam receiving negative trust from  for being "signature scammers" from BadBear, or signature managers giving negative trust to users saying: "this user spammed quotes in the stake your bitcoin address thread and we needed to make posts in the thread doesn't count for the payout".

Stunna left several negatives for people trying to cheat his campaign and other members have left negative when users have been caught trying to cheat giveaways or promotions etc because it's dishonest. Sometimes users do get banned as well. Lots are banned for copying and pasting posts from either the forum or the net. This is both spam and scam because they're attempting to get paid for posts they aren't really making.

If a user is caught using multiple accounts in a signature campaign where multiple account is not allowed he only get his payment denied and gets banned from the signature campaign, but won't receive negative trust and won't be called signature scammer without even taking in consideration the whole picture, like you and others are doing, and they usually don't give back what they received before being caught/banned or whatever.

Having multiple accounts on signature campaigns isn't against the forum rules and I don't care whether someone has 100 accounts on the same campaign making 100 posts a day just as long as they're not spam. It wouldn't be a scam because they're not fraudulently taking money away, but you tried to game the system without putting the effort in (or minimal effort).

And in my opinions their behavior is much worse than mine because what they do is visible, while what I did is not visible. And most of the users that are punished after being caught change their behavior and don't abuse the forum.

The fact that the spam wasn't visible isn't the point, it's that you hid it in an attempt to game and cheat the system. And if you're not banned then you can continue to use the forum and we'll see if your behaviour changes.

I consider what I did signature campaign abuse, but not signature campaign scam. Scam is when some campaign manager don't pay the users, or when someone receive more by mistake and refuse to return the difference, and even to true scammers another chance is given if they repair what they did.

You can consider it whatever you want but it's a scam in mine and others eyes whether you want to admit it or not. You tried to cheat money from a campaign that you hadn't rightfully earned. You're only apologetic because you've been caught and your accounts are now ruined because of your greed and laziness and you've realised it wasn't worth the amount you took and figure it'll be better to return the amount that you defrauded rather than destroy accounts that are likely worth a couple of bitcoins not to mention the further money you can earn from them.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
sadly, coinomat is not super active here on forum and just believe their bot and not checking posts at all. I just hope, that those suckers pointed by OP will be removed from their sig. campaign..

coinomat answered on twitter, so they're aware https://twitter.com/coinomat/status/610340765320019968
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
/dev/null
sadly, coinomat is not super active here on forum and just believe their bot and not checking posts at all. I just hope, that those suckers pointed by OP will be removed from their sig. campaign..
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1499
No I dont escrow anymore.
I'm not Malin Keshar, lithium or catena5260. If you look at my posts you'll see that the majority of my giveaways claims are not  made in the same time as the claims of the other users, even if some have been for coincidence. I bought this account few weeks ago, and it already came with 90% of posts made to claim giveaways.

I just saw some extra characters in someone's post when I quoted him, and since looked like nothing happened to him and I thought that no forum rules have been broke, I did the same.

To be perfectly clear here, you did not break any forum rules. To scam is not against the rules.

I'll return all my payments too, and will remove my signature before I get payment. And I already removed all the small things from my posts. And of course will never do it again.

Sorry for everything, I don't it it would cause so many troubles.

Please everyone accept my apologies, if you think I deserve

No. Selfish greedy spammers[1] like you are the reason signature campaigns and their tolerance are a constant discussion here. Dont tell me you did not know you did something wrong. You went out of your way to hide the symbols. If your mindset is that you are doing something legit and perfectly fine, why hide your actions?

-snip-
And I'm not denying what I did, I'm only trying to bring the whole picture to the topic. You can't judge someone by a single act he or she made, and it is what I'm trying to show.

I consider what I did signature campaign abuse, but not signature campaign scam. Scam is when some campaign manager don't pay the users, or when someone receive more by mistake and refuse to return the difference, and even to true scammers another chance is given if they repair what they did.

Scam is when you agree to a deal and one party gets payment for a service or good they do not deliver. Your deal was to post 75 char posts and while it was probably not stated explicitly you knew that these 75 chars should not be useless junk. You got payment for something you did not deliver. You maliciously modified your posts in order to get paid while you should have not. You were aware of this otherwise you would not have hidden the symbols. If you think others are worse, feel free to speak up and act accordingly, but others and their scams are not the topic of this thread.


[1] Considering that you purposely padded your posts in order to get paid for them makes me wonder whether the payment was the sole purpose for the post. Spam is indeed a bannable offense.
sr. member
Activity: 298
Merit: 250
I'm not Malin Keshar, lithium or catena5260. If you look at my posts you'll see that the majority of my giveaways claims are not  made in the same time as the claims of the other users, even if some have been for coincidence. I bought this account few weeks ago, and it already came with 90% of posts made to claim giveaways.

I just saw some extra characters in someone's post when I quoted him, and since looked like nothing happened to him and I thought that no forum rules have been broke, I did the same.

I'll return all my payments too, and will remove my signature before I get payment. And I already removed all the small things from my posts. And of course will never do it again.

Sorry for everything, I don't it it would cause so many troubles.

Please everyone accept my apologies, if you think I deserve
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
Its not signature abuse, its scam, you are tricking the campaign manager or the bot in this case to believe you made +75 character words to get paid, thats scamming, you are taking money from him fraudulently.
legendary
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1017
I don't see users banned for signature spam receiving negative trust from  for being "signature scammers" from BadBear,

You got caught cheating thats the point and if you want to get your neg trust to be removed try contacting the users who gave you..


WTF, people should try to cheat the cloudthink.io signature campaigns and not the ones that are trying to make a legit living and contributing to the bitcoin community..
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Mistakes? Those are not mistakes, you did it on purpose to scam coinomat, of course you should have negative trust because you are a scammer and not happy doing it with 1 account you do it with more. If you believe someone else is abusing the campaign, report it, dont just say it here, your word means nothing. You are a signature scammer, how can you even deny that? Are you dellusional?


Hilariousandco said "more people are abusing the campaign", but he only said my name in public. You can't say if I reported users abusing the campaign or not because the reports are not public, but the fact is hilarious don't say publicly other's peoples names, so I think there is a double standard(and as you said my word means nothing). Hilarious doesn't even notified me about this thread, giving me no chance of defense. He should open a thread about the coinomat signature abuse in general if

I don't see users banned for signature spam receiving negative trust from  for being "signature scammers" from BadBear, or signature managers giving negative trust to users saying: "this user spammed quotes in the stake your bitcoin address thread and we needed to make posts in the thread doesn't count for the payout". If a user is caught using multiple accounts in a signature campaign where multiple account is not allowed he only get his payment denied and gets banned from the signature campaign, but won't receive negative trust and won't be called signature scammer without even taking in consideration the whole picture, like you and others are doing, and they usually don't give back what they received before being caught/banned or whatever.
 And in my opinions their behavior is much worse than mine because what they do is visible, while what I did is not visible. And most of the users that are punished after being caught change their behavior and don't abuse the forum.

And I'm not denying what I did, I'm only trying to bring the whole picture to the topic. You can't judge someone by a single act he or she made, and it is what I'm trying to show.

I consider what I did signature campaign abuse, but not signature campaign scam. Scam is when some campaign manager don't pay the users, or when someone receive more by mistake and refuse to return the difference, and even to true scammers another chance is given if they repair what they did.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
Mistakes? Those are not mistakes, you did it on purpose to scam coinomat, of course you should have negative trust because you are a scammer and not happy doing it with 1 account you do it with more. If you believe someone else is abusing the campaign, report it, dont just say it here, your word means nothing. You are a signature scammer, how can you even deny that? Are you dellusional?
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
I received another negative feedback from favdesu:

by the way, are you sure they deserve a -ve just for that?

This is debatable. I would have thought a ban is more likely / justified than negative trust.
What forum rule are they breaking?

Pasting gibberish (even in an unreadable font) would constitute spam.

I remember that Candystripes made 70+ spam posts with some account he got for a loan default(pierre something, I think). He would be banned, but he deleted all the spam posts and avoided the ban.

I removed all the extra small characters from my messages, or deleted them, except the ones made where I can't edit them.

good find hilariousandco, appriciated.
you should notify the signature campaign manager about this so he can ban those users from their campaign.

I already posted a link to to this topic in coinomat signature campaign thread. and based on the link that tidus1097 posted (above you), it seems he is already aware of it.
and those users got a -ve rating from hilariousandco so maybe they won't get paid

As I said, I'm ok with receiving no payment and I'm willing to give back everything I've received. Can't say about others. I'm waiting for some statement from Coinomat to know what to do.

Even if I'm not banned from campaign I won't remain with them, as I promised. I don't remove the signature right now because I made the compromise to wear it for 1 week.

If it is not a bot, they must be alts of the same person.
The fact that they are using random characters makes me believe it is a bot. They clearly are trying to post quickly in order to increase their post count so in theory they would just type random buttons on their keyboard to have their posts meet the 75 character minimum, however some of the small characters would require a certain keyboard command in order to be displayed.

Actually, the fact that they're using random characters probably means it isn't a bot.  Think about it, people need to generate junk and they just smash on the keyboards.  If you have a script and you need to generate junk, why not just use some random words in a dictionary or something.

Anyway, the fact that they're using the same strategy does seem to indicate that it's the same person doing it.
Well you are the expert of using bots to cheat various companies, so if you say so then you must be right.

I just found it unlikely that someone would smash their keyboard and special characters would be output

What special characters? I don't have an english keyboard, and if you type alt gr + some letter you will get special characters. And I already said why my posts couldn't be made by a bot, but you just ignored it

Please be more cautious and give more substantial evidence before accusing people of things that would make them being perma-banned


Again forgive me for my mistakes, they won't happen again
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1076
I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.
If it is not a bot, they must be alts of the same person.
The fact that they are using random characters makes me believe it is a bot. They clearly are trying to post quickly in order to increase their post count so in theory they would just type random buttons on their keyboard to have their posts meet the 75 character minimum, however some of the small characters would require a certain keyboard command in order to be displayed.

Actually, the fact that they're using random characters probably means it isn't a bot.  Think about it, people need to generate junk and they just smash on the keyboards.  If you have a script and you need to generate junk, why not just use some random words in a dictionary or something.

Anyway, the fact that they're using the same strategy does seem to indicate that it's the same person doing it.
Well you are the expert of using bots to cheat various companies, so if you say so then you must be right.
Well, you are the expert of dropping unsubstantiated allegations, so [ fill in a pointlesss but witty retort to Quickseller's trolling here ]
Quote

I just found it unlikely that someone would smash their keyboard and special characters would be output
Who knows really?  The main point is that hillarious caught them at it.  Which was pretty cool of him, imo.
copper member
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298
If it is not a bot, they must be alts of the same person.
The fact that they are using random characters makes me believe it is a bot. They clearly are trying to post quickly in order to increase their post count so in theory they would just type random buttons on their keyboard to have their posts meet the 75 character minimum, however some of the small characters would require a certain keyboard command in order to be displayed.

Actually, the fact that they're using random characters probably means it isn't a bot.  Think about it, people need to generate junk and they just smash on the keyboards.  If you have a script and you need to generate junk, why not just use some random words in a dictionary or something.

Anyway, the fact that they're using the same strategy does seem to indicate that it's the same person doing it.
Well you are the expert of using bots to cheat various companies, so if you say so then you must be right.

I just found it unlikely that someone would smash their keyboard and special characters would be output
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1076
I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.
If it is not a bot, they must be alts of the same person.
The fact that they are using random characters makes me believe it is a bot. They clearly are trying to post quickly in order to increase their post count so in theory they would just type random buttons on their keyboard to have their posts meet the 75 character minimum, however some of the small characters would require a certain keyboard command in order to be displayed.

Actually, the fact that they're using random characters probably means it isn't a bot.  Think about it, people need to generate junk and they just smash on the keyboards.  If you have a script and you need to generate junk, why not just use some random words in a dictionary or something.

Anyway, the fact that they're using the same strategy does seem to indicate that it's the same person doing it.

Nice job, hillariousanco, for finding it!  Good catch!
global moderator
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2615
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
I already told coinomat yesterday.
copper member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1007
hee-ho.
good find hilariousandco, appriciated.
you should notify the signature campaign manager about this so he can ban those users from their campaign.

I already posted a link to to this topic in coinomat signature campaign thread. and based on the link that tidus1097 posted (above you), it seems he is already aware of it.
and those users got a -ve rating from hilariousandco so maybe they won't get paid
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
www.gamebet.gg
good find hilariousandco, appriciated.
you should notify the signature campaign manager about this so he can ban those users from their campaign.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 252
And you haven't even asked if all the accounts are mine and just say that they all belong to me as if it is self-evident and beyond all questions, without showing any definitive proof. Many users have posts made more or less closely than from others member without them being alts of each others, because they life in the same time region or just by coincidence.

It is pretty self-evident. It's very likely they are yours and I very much doubt they belong to others who you don't know. It's more than just a coincidence that you're on the same campaign, and often post one after the other, and then there's the fact you were cheating the campaigns in exactly the same way. If I ask an admin to check are you trying to tell me they wont find any other evidence linking you to other alts (which I  believe you have others than the ones mentioned here)? You're not using the same IPs or computers etc? Regardless of that, it still doesn't take away from you on your two accounts cheating the campaign.


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11617003

I'll let you interpret this however.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Giveaways claims are not spam.

That's arguable. When your only existence here is to largely claim giveaways (and cheat them) it's spam in my eyes but I'm not going to get into a discussion about what is and isn't spam and whether you are banned or not is up to the admins.

It is a choice of signature program's managers if they accept giveaways claims or not. Stunna used to accept giveaways claims in his PD signature campaign, for example.

This is irrelevant, still doesn't make it ok to cheat them by padding your character count.

(and less than 100 of my posts are in giveaways threads, any way).

On this account, but the others are worse but the numbers are besides the point.

And when you say that the others don't add too much might be because you are not interested about the subjects I mostly post. Right now I post more in gambling and about soccer, in the past in speculation, and I don't see you posting about such subjects.

Not interested in soccer? You should read my posts more, but again, irrelevant and this isn't about me but you.

And I purposed give back all the money I've earned with coinomat signature(or whatever amount they agree) and don't take part in any signature campaign for some weeks at least.

And I said I would take that into consideration but I'm not promising anything. You still tried to cheat and would have continued to do so had you not been caught.

My life is not even close of being only claiming giveaways.

My game and round count with this account: 49
My post count with this account: 1708 posts

And (lithium) has 32 game and rounds posts, from 281 he ever made.

I can't let it pass because you are s highly trusted member here and your opinions have much value in the administration's eyes, and you are trying to give the impression I'm only here to post in giveaways threads and do insubstantial posts, what is a lie. Even while in the  coinomat campaign, the majority of my posts haven't been made in game and rounds threads and with no aid of small extra characters.

And you haven't even asked if all the accounts are mine and just say that they all belong to me as if it is self-evident and beyond all questions, without showing any definitive proof. Many users have posts made more or less closely than from others member without them being alts of each others, because they life in the same time region or just by coincidence.







You seem to be missing the point. You are scamming Coinomat by padding your short posts with random characters. How about addressing that.

Yes, I did it and I'm willing to return the money and face the consequences. I would never try to deny it.

But I'm being accused of ONLY doing it, and by using 4 accounts to do it, and by one of the most trusted members here, hilarioussandco.


And you haven't even asked if all the accounts are mine and just say that they all belong to me as if it is self-evident and beyond all questions, without showing any definitive proof. Many users have posts made more or less closely than from others member without them being alts of each others, because they life in the same time region or just by coincidence.

It is pretty self-evident. It's very likely they are yours and I very much doubt they belong to others who you don't know. It's more than just a coincidence that you're on the same campaign, and often post one after the other, and then there's the fact you were cheating the campaigns in exactly the same way. If I ask an admin to check are you trying to tell me they wont find any other evidence linking you to other alts (which I  believe you have others than the ones mentioned here)? You're not using the same IPs or computers etc? Regardless of that, it still doesn't take away from you on your two accounts cheating the campaign.

Yes, you can ask the admins about same IP's or computers. And if you have evidence of others accounts that you think belong to me you may ask me, I will confirm or deny and you can leave them neg trust too if they are mine.

And, as I said, it is not an absurd that others might have perceived it before and copied me or had the same idea without my help.

And I'm not trying to deny what I did.
global moderator
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2615
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
And you haven't even asked if all the accounts are mine and just say that they all belong to me as if it is self-evident and beyond all questions, without showing any definitive proof. Many users have posts made more or less closely than from others member without them being alts of each others, because they life in the same time region or just by coincidence.

It is pretty self-evident. It's very likely they are yours and I very much doubt they belong to others who you don't know. It's more than just a coincidence that you're on the same campaign, and often post one after the other, and then there's the fact you were cheating the campaigns in exactly the same way. If I ask an admin to check are you trying to tell me they wont find any other evidence linking you to other alts (which I  believe you have others than the ones mentioned here)? You're not using the same IPs or computers etc? Regardless of that, it still doesn't take away from you on your two accounts cheating the campaign.
Pages:
Jump to: