Topic: Sex Partners Must Say "Yes" Every 10 Minutes, California 10th Graders Taught - page 2. (Read 3143 times)

It is all inter-related. Professor C. Rhonda Cobham-Sander, an extreme-left wing black supremacist was appointed as the adviser for the accuser. The male student was given an incompetent adviser, who messed up his case. Since we don't know the real identities of the accuser and the accused, I can't be sure. But it seems to me that there is something fishy with this lawsuit.

however, it appears the female student found some new 'friends' of the same mindset, namely labelled as victim advocates in the article. shortly afterwards, she took the story to the college's  administration, resulting in the male student's  expulsion.

however, something else that was quite interesting: it seems the 'lawyer' that the male student had for his defense performed so poorly that he later sued.
http://www.mindingthecampus.org/2015/06/amhersts-version-of-kafkas-the-trial/
the "lawyer" was more trained in social justice than civil justice.

Although it was the female accuser who initiated the lawsuit, she will not see any benefits out of it. According to the report, she has become some sort of pariah within the Amherst College. All the compensation will go for legal expenses. The only people who are going to benefit out of this is the lawyers, who are siding with the accuser (and probably the judge, who will receive kickbacks later).

like i always say, these people are fucking lunatics. take a look at this case: https://reason.com/blog/2015/06/11/amherst-student-was-expelled-for-rape-bu
 tl;dr, male student is drunk (blacked out), receives bj, female student cries rape later and gets the guy expelled. and a note, the male was the female student's roommate's boyfriend, how fucked up is that. this idea of consent only goes 1 way with these people, and the double standards simply go unaddressed.

Believe it or not, they are lecturing on about verbal approval even before a kiss.

American media have become a huge echo chamber and provide a platform for pseudo-progressives that are in fact abiding to totalitarian radical left ideology. I hope common sense will help people realize this is all a sham.

Thet's ridicilous. Only one yes at th bwginning wouldbe enough. This is uderestimation of peoples

not just anti male, its more or less anti-anyone that disagrees with radical feminism. this would include females that arent radically anti-male or whatever these people are. lunatics.

I should have been clearer.  The explicit sexism in not in Lauda's remarks but in the entire thrust of the regulatory documents promulgating this set of policies.  It's anti-male, and explicitly so.

They have already destroyed the Scandinavian countries. In Norway and Sweden, it is not possible to find any males or females. The human population there has become gender-less, transforming to some type of Androgynous species. This is being hailed as the biggest victory in the history of radical feminism. The same is going to happen in the US, and the other Western countries.

How is that sexism? It is just an example.

Thanks to the state-mandated vaccines, the youth are becoming autistic and incapable of correctly evaluating social cues, like the "token no":

If you're doing it right the bitch is screaming yes every 3 seconds...


Also, California is basically a state full of mongols.
(no offence to the non-mongol cali folks)

No, actually not.

It all started with a complete lie promulgated by the White House, that 1 in 4 college women had been raped.  That led to colleges being strong armed to implement various programs to prevent, and to adjudicate the mythical rapes. 

Of course the Republicans would point out the lies and the myths, and then they could be claimed to be waging yet more of the "War on Women" that they never ever did.  But it would advance the narrative.

The Pink Mafia loves this, because they get to exert control on the population.

Defining "consent" as "affirmative verbal statements" is explicitly expanding the definition of rape hundreds of fold, plus directly interjecting a third party - government - into relations between two individuals. 

Personally I can't fathom what sort of Perverted Liberal Authoritarian Control Freak would have dreamed this up.

This has to be satire.... right?

Its funny how our new sexual freedom is reverting back to puritanism thanks to feminists  .

It does actually seem to be a way to demonize, stereotype and persecute men.  Those are fundamental hallmarks of propaganda methods.

I wonder if this "consent craziness" extends to sex for money.  Probably doesn't, because it's a contract.

Side note - I think if I were in college today and had to deal with this crazy, Instead of being intimidated I'd associate with girls more.  Make a point of getting in dance classes instead of tennis classes.  Not sure at all how I'd handle the crazy, it would still be there....

I'm very disappointed.

I thought this was some craziness from California, but it has already reached Europe. I guess there's only one solution left. This is for university students in the UK, and the 10th graders in America, meaning that if we really want to enjoy sex without checking the time constantly, we'll have to do it with 9th graders. I guess sex with women over 80 would be safe too. They would not be able to check the time accurately.

I’M A STUDENT, AND I TOO DECLINE TO ATTEND ‘CONSENT CLASSES’(UK)


I am not a rapist. But I’m in my second week as a university student, and already modern feminism and “consent culture” is trying to pin that label on me.

The University of Warwick Student’s Union has set up classes called “I Heart Consent,” apparently aimed at teaching young people about how to get it on without accidentally raping their partner. I say people, but what I mean is men, because as all of today’s mainstream leftist ideologues know, men cannot be raped by women. When women do it, it’s called “non-consensual sex.”

George Lawlor, a reporter for The Tab Warwick, has been first to publicly rebel against these finger-wagging tutorials. Now I must add my name to what I am sure is a growing list of understandably aggrieved young men. These classes are useless, and may even be damaging.

How many rapists are going to stop raping people because some pretentious student told them that “Yes means Yes”? Any at all? And why would any normal, right-thinking man attend a class that demonises them and normal, healthy male sexuality by pretending that all men are latent rapists who would take advantage of women if they thought they could get away with it?

Consent classes aren’t compulsory — yet — but it is heavily implied that attending them would be A Good Idea. At the Sports Fair last Tuesday, I saw stickers on one stand advertising them. I can’t be the only person to see a bit of irony in the coercion and social pressure attached to signing up for consent lectures.

Anyway, I’m not going. I think we all know what goes down at these things anyway, don’t we? The male students will be bombarded with stats about “1 in 4 women,” bogus and offensive conspiracy theories about “toxic masculinity,” and suggestions that yes, all men are potential rapists.

Well, I’m sorry, but in case you didn’t know, pre-crime is sci-fi. Having a penis does not make me a rapist. In fact, the highest volume of domestic violence and sexual abuse is found in lesbian couples – you know, the ones that don’t actually involve men.

This new obsession with affirmative, ongoing consent perpetuated by wacky third-wave feminists is scaring a whole generation of young men — myself included, if I’m being honest. Even before arriving at university, I was terrified of being falsely accused of rape.

I had never been as comfortable around girls as some of my friends, and I imagined going to university surrounded by them would allow me to improve my conversation skills and maybe even find somebody who might want to be more than friends with me. But it’s too risky now.

Unless I actively know the other partner’s idea of consent and destroy any hint of excitement or romance by effectively (and I joke but this can’t be far off) getting them to sign a form between thrusts, how can I start anything with anyone? So here we are. No one-night stands or innocent smooching in a dark corner of the SU for me.

It’s just not worth the risk of jail time, expulsion, and a permanent blot on my life because some batty, vindictive, or remorseful person decides the next day that maybe she wasn’t really into it after all. It’s amazing to me that universities aren’t just tolerating but actively supporting this state of affairs in their codes of conduct.

There’s no such thing as “rape culture,” but there is a crime being committed on university campuses across Europe and America. It’s the demonisation of men and the pernicious spread of consent classes, the underlying suggestion of them being that men are dangerous sex pests and have to be “taught not to be rapists.” Men — and women — deserve better.


http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/16/im-a-student-and-i-too-decline-to-attend-consent-classes/

true, but i think its gone beyond a simple case if people's lives are being destroyed by these lunatics simply for disagreeing with whatever ideologies theyre trying to shove down people's throats at the time. there are people that have been fired from their jobs, or are even facing jail time as a consequence of these lunatics' pursuits in creating this fantasy world where everyone is 100% nice to each other 100% of the time. and i dont think the silent majority will stand up to the loud minority until the issue becomes big enough that the lives are the majority are directly affected. hopefully, its getting close to that point of  action, especially if these radicals are being allowed audiences in the UN.

i think part of the issue is that the media has to placate the wants of the loud minority for PR reasons.