Pages:
Author

Topic: Shasan, suchmoon and marlboroza negative reputation and judgment (Read 963 times)

legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1261
Heisenberg
OMG, am in tears! Good luck, it was nice having you here Bitcoin Grandpa.

That's why they call me slim SHADY...
With the kind of silly attitude you have. I only expect one thing for you. More and more negative feedback from DT members and no "intervention" from the mods, because, that's not their work.

The people who would have helped you are the ones you are sending negative feedback to. Never seen foolish self-proclaimed "senior member" here, like you before.
full member
Activity: 265
Merit: 100
Let me instruct you, you may not know, but bct mods DO remove bad trust if proven non-sensical.
You should really listen to what not so legendary member told you, besides, trust ratings on your account are factual, you asked for non collateral loan, you have been rejected then you start accusing lender. Even if in some alternative universe someone remove those ratings you have another one for selling HYIP thingy. Just keep ranting more, make all users aware of your behavior and you might get more -ve's and more support for that flag.

over and out.

Whatever you say, still waiting.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
Let me instruct you, you may not know, but bct mods DO remove bad trust if proven non-sensical.
You should really listen to what not so legendary member told you, besides, trust ratings on your account are factual, you asked for non collateral loan, you have been rejected then you start accusing lender. Even if in some alternative universe someone remove those ratings you have another one for selling HYIP thingy. Just keep ranting more, make all users aware of your behavior and you might get more -ve's and more support for that flag.

over and out.
full member
Activity: 265
Merit: 100
Nop, I gave you negative reputation cause you were supporting the same people with the attitude you just stated ( no reason for negative rep). If you support these people I'm in the right of doing the same.

You just contradicted yourself.

LoyceV didn't really support any of your perceived "enemies". You might want to re-read his posts - there's a lot of good information on how the trust system works.

Let me instruct you, you may not know, but bct mods DO remove bad trust if proven non-sensical.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Nop, I gave you negative reputation cause you were supporting the same people with the attitude you just stated ( no reason for negative rep). If you support these people I'm in the right of doing the same.

You just contradicted yourself.

LoyceV didn't really support any of your perceived "enemies". You might want to re-read his posts - there's a lot of good information on how the trust system works.
full member
Activity: 265
Merit: 100
Please do note to all new readers: I've never dealt with any user which gave me bad reputation.
You've never dealt with me either, and yet, you gave me negative feedback. But don't worry, you didn't give me a bad reputation, by abusing the Trust system you've disqualified yourself from ever becoming meaningful to the Trust system. You're not even important enough to exclude, Lol Cheesy
Negative feedback isn't what gave you a bad reputation, you did that all by yourself.

Waiting on moderators...
made at imgflip.com
from Imgflip Meme Generator

Nop, I gave you negative reputation cause you were supporting the same people with the attitude you just stated ( no reason for negative rep). If you support these people I'm in the right of doing the same.

You just contradicted yourself.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Please do note to all new readers: I've never dealt with any user which gave me bad reputation.
You've never dealt with me either, and yet, you gave me negative feedback. But don't worry, you didn't give me a bad reputation, by abusing the Trust system you've disqualified yourself from ever becoming meaningful to the Trust system. You're not even important enough to exclude, Lol Cheesy
Negative feedback isn't what gave you a bad reputation, you did that all by yourself.

Waiting on moderators...
made at imgflip.com
from Imgflip Meme Generator
full member
Activity: 265
Merit: 100
Please do note to all new readers: I've never dealt with any user which gave me bad reputation.
6 people gave you negative trust, why you have created scam accusation against 3 people only? Also, condoras denied your loan application, so you should create scam accusation against him(twice).

You started all this, it's your entire fault. Waiting on moderators...
copper member
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1302
Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook
Please do note to all new readers: I've never dealt with any user which gave me bad reputation.
6 people gave you negative trust, why you have created scam accusation against 3 people only? Also, condoras denied your loan application, so you should create scam accusation against him(twice).
full member
Activity: 265
Merit: 100
Please do note to all new readers: I've never dealt with any user which gave me bad reputation.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1104
This is what I do. I drink and I know things.
Still waiting for moderator to act on this case as it should, negative rep given in return to marlboroza with same reference he gave.
Still, no case resolved, and another case added? So, you have created a dispute against three people? I think soon you have to create a dispute against more people.

By the by, why you are not creating scam accusation against condoras as he has denied to lend you 0.6BTC loan?

Lol man, I'm asking myself the same! Cheesy

My mistake was that I leave this guy to see what he will do and if he will ask from others, since the last PM I get from him. Now though, I get tired a bit with this nonsense "attack", so I will create a flag since I'm more than confident that dealing with this "user" is a loss from the start. If though there is someone who can make it faster than me, I will support it asap. Grin

Last PM (I didn't even bother to answer to this one).
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Still waiting for moderator to act on this case as it should
You've left 7 users fake negative feedback over this:
Image loading...
Meanwhile, you're demanding the negative feedback you've received to be removed? Lol! That makes you a hypocrite.

For Reference: you left me negative feedback for this. I'll leave you a neutral warning tag, because that's how the Trust system is used correctly. And unlike your feedback, mine means something.

Leaving the forum until I see my negative rep removed.
Well, you didn't last 3 hours
full member
Activity: 265
Merit: 100
Leaving the forum until I see my negative rep removed, welcome 2017 bitcoiners.
OMG, am in tears! Good luck, it was nice having you here Bitcoin Grandpa.

That's why they call me slim SHADY...
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1261
Heisenberg
Leaving the forum until I see my negative rep removed, welcome 2017 bitcoiners.
OMG, am in tears! Good luck, it was nice having you here Bitcoin Grandpa.
full member
Activity: 265
Merit: 100
Still waiting for moderator to act on this case as it should, negative rep given in return to marlboroza with same reference he gave.
You're not listening to the members here who are telling you that moderators aren't going to do anything for you.  It's the truth, and I tell you this as someone who isn't taking any sides in this matter.  Negative trust can only be resolved between the person who gave it and the recipient.  Moderators do NOT moderate trust--or scams, for that matter.

Actually they do moderate trust.

Leaving the forum until I see my negative rep removed, welcome 2017 bitcoiners.

We d0n't g0t n0thing in c0mmon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91bcI3TcAtM
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
Still waiting for moderator to act on this case as it should, negative rep given in return to marlboroza with same reference he gave.
You're not listening to the members here who are telling you that moderators aren't going to do anything for you.  It's the truth, and I tell you this as someone who isn't taking any sides in this matter.  Negative trust can only be resolved between the person who gave it and the recipient.  Moderators do NOT moderate trust--or scams, for that matter.

Edit:

Actually they do moderate trust.

Leaving the forum until I see my negative rep removed, welcome 2017 bitcoiners.

We d0n't g0t n0thing in c0mmon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91bcI3TcAtM
No idea what you're talking about here, and I'm not clicking on a Youtube link.  If you can't express yourself succinctly and clearly, I'm not going to bother reading anything else from you.  I would also suggest that you have no idea why that trust you referred to was removed.  If you have proof it was because of a moderator, feel free to post some evidence.  Otherwise, listen to what people are telling you.
copper member
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1302
Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook
Still waiting for moderator to act on this case as it should, negative rep given in return to marlboroza with same reference he gave.
Still, no case resolved, and another case added? So, you have created a dispute against three people? I think soon you have to create a dispute against more people.

By the by, why you are not creating scam accusation against condoras as he has denied to lend you 0.6BTC loan?
copper member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1822
Top Crypto Casino
Still waiting for moderator to act on this case as it should, negative rep given in return to marlboroza with same reference he gave.
If you are waiting for moderators to settle any dispute or scam accusation, then you are better off attempting to bite some water. You have a higher chance of being successful at it.
full member
Activity: 265
Merit: 100
Still waiting for moderator to act on this case as it should, negative rep given in return to marlboroza with same reference he gave.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
This copper member user registered in 2018 just gave me negative reputation without an actual deal with him.
You seem quite hostile, there's no need to drag in registration dates and Copper Membership. If you want to get something done, try to be friendly.
There's no need to deal with someone before leaving feedback. This description can fit without trading:
Code:
Negative - You think that trading with this person is high-risk.

Why you have deleted your posts from bitcointalk as well as telegram?
Cause you were quite disrespectful
From what I've seen, you were disrespectful, not shasan.

I will let bitcointalk admins take care of this situtation, a coppermember like you against a core user like me is funny to watch. popcorn
What kind of self-torture is this?

Edited main post - scam accusation against you too. MUCH posts...
Retaliation feedback also doesn't do you any good. You may want to read LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system.



Your quote: "Most lenders are actually "fake" lenders" is probably true on the Lending board, but not for shasan. In his thread, you just seem disgruntled for not getting a loan. You're unfriendly, but I wouldn't have tagged you for that. This on the other hand doesn't look good, and I completely understand why people don't trust you. And this quote: "0.007btc? lol you funny rejecting this" is something I've seen before. You're trying to make 0.007 BTC look small, while you don't even have it.
Pages:
Jump to: